Nah, if everyone's peeking turn 1 it should be correct to steal.

if player 6 is a villager he can maybe hc, depends what he got tho

i too can confirm i didn't win

Pretty sure claiming isn't optimal, since if this was to hand out an infinity stone, it is likely being hunted for by NEFARIOUS INDIVIDUALS

If wolves are allowed to chat about it, then players 2 and 6?

Not sure what to make of it at this point, but it looks like the person who started with the winning shard (player 6) chose to steal blue in r1. Then protect, protect most likely. So wc could possibly coordinate there.

Maybe I'm overthinking it idk.

So basically the wolves probably got it, which is not good

they can conglomerate their peeks to know the location of the prize with 6/8 certainty
then they just get an easy protect, protect win

I think it's safe to assume that wolves weren't allowed to talk about it.

Yeah, I didn't consider this. I assumed there was a peek or something in the shard.

hc player 7 here

Question is, would wolf1 peek wolf2s holding on turn 1, I'm not sure.

Steal(succesfully)+protect+protect should get you there > rand with all these peakers, so it's a viable strategy for a villag0r.

Good Morning fellow Heroes!

2/8 or sometimes 1/8 chance to win with this strat.
if we have masons or something and they get in next time that would be aces, gives them a 5-6/8 chance afaik

Alright lunchtime bbl

btw I peeked green r2 and tried to steal r3 so player 6 definitely knew they had it by r3 if not before

All this discussion is moot unless we know if outside chat was allowed

If not, then we should probably just stfu about it and hope for the best

I was player 2.

On further reading, Namath appears more villagery than not.

The only thing I really disliked was hopping on the "yawn is a scumlord" train. I might have been mistaken about disliking a post of yours, because nothing stood out to me as bad on re-read. Also disagree with your scum-lean on viggo.

My villas are: Chicken-man, Gamer Dude, Namath, Pesky, Viggo.

I'm probably missing a couple, but those were from memory.

I don't have any strong reads on other DM players yet. Tunak's posting seems null so far, Stork's posts have been alright, his reads post felt a little "try-hard" if that makes sense, haha. Banks' push on me feels different than in the Futurama game where he pushed on Stork, as mafia.

In the futurama game, Banks was asking other players about Stork, and openly pressing towards him and directing attention that way, based just off of Stork's opening that game.

In this game, Banks is mostly just stating that he doesn't like me so far, and agreeing with others who don't like me either.

I need to read this event.

Need to leave for a while. Stork, my eyes are onto you. Make me proud, or I'm killing you later.

Mod Note

Q: Was collusion allowed in the event?

A: If players' roles allows outside thread communication, yes. Otherwise only event-thread communication was allowed

'Definitely' doesn't really belong here.

But the mod spew is pointing toward it, as most of you either knew or deduced.

I think we should start a straw poll.

How many dumbbells will we allow fraley to have before we lynch him?

you're all ******ed, Thanos is ultra likely in this game as a NSK and his whole deal is those stones afaik

stfu about which player you were

I'm pretty sure wolves not being allowed to discuss these kinds of events is 100% standard, and if that's the case then this discussion is a waste of time.