Quote:
Originally Posted by Evene
Lord seems like a detailed and analytical thinker. It's hard to fake that amount of content. He has posted detailed and analytical thoughts about game theory, but his reads are just simple sentences with no justification. I want to see detailed, analytical posts about other players in the game.
It is day 1. I have always done wagonomics and analyse patterns of action, not "tone".
As in, I'm looking at actual output not how someone comes across.
I think you, Md and diceman are all putting other players to scrutiny about their reads and their behaviour without really making a lot of firm reads or anything. On the one hand, it could mean we have an excellent village who is taking this investigation seriously. That's all good.
On the other, I find it hard to believe there isn't one wolf stirring the pot in there.
Also, the votes have been static for hours now. Know what that means? Wolves are happy with the current state of play. The lack of real movement supports my idea that me and cohen are v v.
Since the three of you are all kind of taking shots from the fringes, offering advice about how to move things on without .... Actually moving things on, suggests to me there's a wolf in there.
The village would be much better off trying to find a wolf in evene / md / diceman than focusing on me or Cohen.