Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
[Posts moved from ex-official Winning Poker Network Discussion Thread in Internet Poker Forum] [Posts moved from ex-official Winning Poker Network Discussion Thread in Internet Poker Forum]

11-11-2019 , 07:56 PM
11-11-2019 , 07:58 PM
11-11-2019 , 09:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Haven
I am offended by and do not appreciate your unnecessary insults of me for my attempt to assist you, (and, probably, others), and I have temp-banned you for three days, as my direct response.
This is ridiculous dude. She wasn't complaining about you. She was complaining about Mike HAVVEN.

Power tripping admin goes on a power trip. Details on your late local news.
11-11-2019 , 11:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Morphismus
[Posts moved from ex-official Winning Poker Network Discussion Thread in Internet Poker Forum]
11-12-2019 , 01:16 AM
Thanks for not moving this to NVG.
11-12-2019 , 11:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by niss
This is ridiculous dude. She wasn't complaining about you. She was complaining about Mike HAVVEN.

Power tripping admin goes on a power trip. Details on your late local news.
As you can imagine, I'm still very upset about this - although I admit I am slowly getting to feel a bit better. I even managed to catch a few hours of sleep last night, you'll be pleased to hear.

In a couple of days we'll all be able to look back and laugh at such high drama over "nothing"!

I hope Lady B will be willing to let bygones be bygones and not let this unsavoury interlude sully her future experiences in these wonderful forums.

not
11-15-2019 , 04:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Haven
ladybruin

It appears to me that after your 11 years of experience in these forums you still don't know how to use some of the basic tools here. I won't demonise you for this
, but I would say it makes it far easier for readers to follow your argument if you do include relevant quotes and references in your posts.

To multi-quote, click on the ''+ sign at the bottom right of the relevant posts, then click on Post Reply at the bottom left of the page of posts. Edit the posts in the Reply window, as necessary. (See my multi-quotes, above.)

To refer to an individual post by way of a link, you can click on the number of the post, top right, which will open a single-post window. Then copy/paste the url of that single-post into your Reply.

If these instructions are not clear to you, please feel free to PM me, and I'll try again, privately. (I'm posting this in the open forum, as it may benefit some noobs, as well.)

Thank you for your compliance.
Mike Haven

If someone throws shade at me, then I throw shade back. And I can fight my own battles. But, if someone throws shade at me, I throw shade back and then I get temp banned, then it isn’t a fair fight. Therefore, since I lived in Las Vegas for 10 years and attended a couple of David Sklansky’s parties, I decided to talk to David about you. I started laughing and spit soda across the room when...

David said, “I’ve never heard of Miken Haven.”

So Mike Haven, I have two questions for you.

First, let’s start with the non-bolded part. As you obviously know (but incase some others don’t know), the non-bolded part is a 2+2 canned post that quickly and conveniently relays some helpful information. Mike, you have probably copied and pasted that canned post dozens of times over the years. There is no need to search them all. Question #1, if we looked up the last 10 times you made that canned post, how many of those posts were essentially just the canned post with no additional commentary snarky or otherwise) added?

Second, now to the meat and potatoes, which is the part I bolded. It is very cute the commentary you put above the canned post directed at me, but then felt insulted when I called you out on it and I responded in kind. Question #2, Mike Haven is the readership of 2+2 to conclude that you can give snarky comment, you that you can’t take snarky comments?

Ah heck Mike Haven, let's just take this as a rhetorical post, not expecting a response. You NOT responding will mean bygones are being bygones.

Also thanks to the posters that caught Mike Haven's power trippin' hypocrisy especially given the original post of this thread (which I won't quote).

I'd be extra happy and party hard this weekend if a moderator locked this thread with me getting the last word.

Last edited by ladybruin; 11-15-2019 at 05:11 PM.
11-15-2019 , 05:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ladybruin
I decided to talk to David about you. I started laughing and spit soda across the room when...

David said, “I’ve never heard of Miken Haven.”
FWIW, this is not even remotely surprising. Given David's level of involvement with the site, I'd have been more surprised if he had heard of him, even though Mike's been a key moderator on the site for 15+ years. Impressive name drop, though.

No particular point here; just wanted to save you from wasting more soda next time you chat with David.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ladybruin
Also thanks to the posters that caught Mike Haven's power trippin' hypocrisy especially given the original post of this thread (which I won't quote).
Apparently obvious jokes aren't so obvious.
11-15-2019 , 06:19 PM
We have come full circle. Bobo Fett was the original snarky moderator that created the need for this thread in the first place.

As the original poster of this thread, and the person who said as far as I was concerned this thread was settled, I think I've asked 4 or 5 times for this thread to be locked. Getting this thread locked is harder than calculus.

Last edited by ladybruin; 11-15-2019 at 06:25 PM.
11-15-2019 , 07:37 PM
Ok
11-16-2019 , 07:04 AM
Thanks, Dave!

We got him goood, like I told you we would. What a pillock.
Closed Thread Subscribe
...

      
m