OK, if I grant you that it is, then I am so sorry you are facing such a terrible thing. Are they against the rules?

That you can't answer.

I don't think so. I am merely stating why I don't care to answer. ST is trolling though.

LOL

And to repeat, all I'd like is a ___-___ ______.

Yeah, we get it. You have not been able to show you don't have one.

No, just no. I made about a dozen AC101 posts where I was teaching a class, so to speak, explaining what ACism is all about. That was just a meme I picked off the interwebs, which I used to decorate the top of my posts. I've never made any 'argument' about rape-town, one way or another, in any of those AC101 posts. In fact, I've never even mentioned rape-town, or that meme, or anything close to this shiz in any of those posts.

Who am I 'strawmanning'? Not you... you weren't even posting here then. In fact, I wasn't making any 'arguments' at all. I was teaching a class, I was trying to explain this shiz to the folks... the 'statists' and the ACers alike.

What you are whining about here doesn't even make any sense.

The only one fixating on that meme is you. Why are you doing that? How about you cut that shiz out. I doesn't make a lick-o-sense to claim I'm 'strawmanning' you. I wasn't even making an 'argument' with anyone. You weren't even posting here then.

AC hasn't been discussed much in 'chezland' so not sure why that came up. I'm not one myself but still think it's an interesting political discussion which should be welcome in a politics discussion forum.

You know the objection to the 'safe space' point. i.e that it's untrue - what people really want is a level playing field. We can allow a level of personal attacks/trolling or not but posters really hate any perception that it's not a personal attack if the mod believes it's true or justified.

I'm the one asking about rapetown. It could be a dozen other things getting at the core idea that ACland has no central government so there is only kumbiya to stop the power from being accumulated by a group that uses it for awful purposes. To which the traditional ACist response was "well power is abused in statistland too and drones."

Co-incidentally I've just written a character reference for trolly in 7.0 that probably works itt also

The important question is: what color would trolly use when mentioning Socrates in a post?

Ban if it's not close to Pleasant Pastel Green

You're confusing me with my colorful cousin, Shamey.

There is a method to my madness. I only do SNs.

Unless Socrates reg'ed hear under his IRL name, he'd just be Socrates. For SNs I use the current 2+2 color. There are a handful of exceptions for select Odi Award winners (Toothsayer, BruceZ, TomVeil, and Teh Jabber-Wookie).

Why does TS get red?

because he's the administrator of odiousness

Why is Fly in such a minute font?

My 'odi' award winners. All the Trollys, 5ive, Flywf, jalfrezi and GBV. Any objections odious ones?

I never win anything

Never say never. Festivus is coming...

None of those

In order: No Quarter, Moo Buckets, Rep, Einbert

...denying the death of 20 kids should win the match, no?

My list is crap. It is just a bunch of political opponents whom I dislike ie just as relevant as Shame Trollys odious list which he seems to put a great deal of effort into for some bizarre reason.

Your list looks better than either of ours though since Einbert is in it and Sandy Hook conspiracies are rock bottom.

Naw. The Odi Award doesn't get handed out to my political opponents. I don't really have political opponents here, but they don't get handed out to most of those that I spend most of my time yapping with either.

You gotta be odious to win an Odi Award. The 'bizarre reason' comment was was spot-on, however.

It's up to the Competition Committee, not me. They deliberate in private. I can say there have been several inquiries regarding Sandy Hook. Historically, being a zombie (coming back from a perma), and having an extremely obnoxious avatar, seem to have swayed the committee. We're going to all have to wait until Festivus however

I think marn illustrates the problem conservatives have on this forum: instead of judging objective reality, they simply project their own biases onto others. Since they know they'd be biased while modding, they assume others are. Since they know their list of bad posters would only be comprised of political opponents, they assume others would do the same.

I don't fully understand if Trump brought this out of them, or just was such a blatant abuser of projection that it made it easier to realize that this is what conservatives do.

Exactly. The latter. It's been going on as long as "Lefty Mods Gotta Go" has been their manta. Same shiz... all long before MAGA.