Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Legend
I think a lot of your thoughts are valid, of course, but I also think you might be feeling a bit beaten up by the process and susceptible to viewing things in a negative light because of recent rejection.
This is definitely true - rejection and fatigue. Over the past 2 months or so, I've done 5 full-day interview loops and 15 short interviews (in-person and phone), not to mention countless calls with recruiters. At the same time, this isn't something I just started feeling, but more of a summary of how I've been feeling all along. I may have mentioned this before but some headhunter a couple of months ago spent like 15 minutes trying to convince me that my comp #s are wrong or impossible based on my profile and that was before I had any interview. The comp being a sticking point in so many conversations is something that makes me question what I'm doing because I'm actually understating my comp in most of these conversations (either understate equity value or not even mention it at times) and in terms of just cash comp, I was already fairly close to this level almost a decade ago. I mean, objectively speaking, I understand what they are thinking but that doesn't make me feel any better.
Quote:
The new opportunity should be a solution for the current lack of "pedigree" but it is largely superficial. Like Suzzer said, tons of start-ups and tech in general is fraudulent.
It seems to me that superficial matters a lot when you're trying to convince strangers to hire you or invest in your company or simply pay more attention to what you have to say. If anything, the amount of fraudulence in the startup ecosystem makes pedigree more important because it gives you credibility, even if overreliance on pedigree itself is what enables certain types of fraud. I've talked to some startup types too and it was interesting how they are trying to sell themselves - practically every pitch included some version of, we will be successful because we are from (or have engineers from) name-brand companies. Just about every recruiter hiring for more obscure companies tried to emphasize how they have engineers from some name-brand companies and this magically makes their engineering team worth joining. At some point, you figure, they are doing this because it works on some people - the halo effect does seem real.
Quote:
The other thing you mention, having close connections in tech, is absolutely essential. It really doesn't take much to meet new people, especially if you go in with low expectations. Joining a new company is a great time to figure out what co-workers are involved with in the local tech community and which of them are looking for more people to be a part of it (all of them).
Yeah though it's questionable how much time I have for involvement in community and that kind of stuff, given family/kids. But even just the new co-workers themselves would be a significant addition to my network over time since they have a few hundred engineers in NYC. They are also much more involved in the tech scene, host a lot of talks/events, etc. I don't really know anyone in tech here - I've been with one small company, we've had very little turnover and many in the engineering team aren't even local. Again, it's crazy how poorly I've played my hands and I can't help but feel some degree of anger at myself for letting things get to this point.
Of course I'm doing pretty well by any reasonable standards and I can definitely be accused of lacking perspective. But still.