** UnhandledExceptionEventHandler :: OFFICIAL LC / CHATTER THREAD ** - Page 1169 - Computer Technical Help

Two Plus Two Forums Other Topics Computer and Technical Help

** UnhandledExceptionEventHandler :: OFFICIAL LC / CHATTER THREAD **

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 1169 of 1603

First

169 669 969 1069 1119 1149 1159 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1179 1189 1219 1269 1369

Last

Page 1169 of 1603

First

169 669 969 1069 1119 1149 1159 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1179 1189 1219 1269 1369

Last

08-03-2017 , 10:59 PM

#29201

Larry Legend

Celtic Pride

Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 42,243

I feel like if done right a weekend assignment could be pretty decent.

One of my friends had me do the one he uses when I was practicing for interviews and it was pretty good. It was using a data file and parsing it and using express to create pseudo-apis and make pre-written tests pass. The data was a bit funky so you had to create somewhat robust parsing.

I feel like you give a pretty basic test like that and talk through it with the candidate and you should have a pretty good idea if they can hang.

The thing with you where you were then asked "why didn't you build a shadow dom" is just laugh in their face and walk away type stuff tho.

Quote

$25m Guaranteed WPM on CoinPoker

Join the action now

Daily Rewards • Splash Pots • CoinRaces

08-03-2017 , 11:00 PM

#29202

Larry Legend

Celtic Pride

Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 42,243

Quote:

Originally Posted by daveT

I would like to take this moment to say that the Shopify API is the most disastrous pile of flaming garbage I've ever had the displeasure of working with.

Hmm, every dev I know who has used Shopify for personal stuff has praised it. And I'm thinking of one person with very high standards.

Quote

08-03-2017 , 11:01 PM

#29203

suzzer99

Save the Cheerleader, Save the World

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 101,163

Quote:

Originally Posted by daveT

I would think Netflix gets 1,000 applications per day and I would think there is a higher collection of viable candidates, being near all those colleges and stuff. How would they afford to churn that many developers every month?

I'm not a CS grad. Dude reached out to me on LinkedIn because of my experience and talk at node summit. I went through a couple rounds of interviews, but my homework assignment - which was well established was not my expertise - wasn't rock-star-y enough for them.

I had a chance to jump over to the node team, but stayed with the original guy who called me because I thought the work (getting Netflix to work on an endless stream of new devices) sounded more fun. Big mistake in terms of getting the job. But overall I'm happy with the way things turned out. I didn't want to move and I can't stand Sili Valley culture.

They did offer me some back of the house support thing as like a remedial chance to prove myself and work my way up. Felt good to say no to that.

Last edited by suzzer99; 08-03-2017 at 11:07 PM.

Quote

08-03-2017 , 11:03 PM

#29204

suzzer99

Save the Cheerleader, Save the World

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 101,163

Quote:

Originally Posted by Larry Legend

Yeah - and how dare you have an async race condition bug. We always build perfect software on the first pass here.

Yes I'm still annoyed.

Quote

08-03-2017 , 11:20 PM

#29205

daveT

S.A.G.E. Master

Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 23,955

Quote:

Originally Posted by Larry Legend

Hmm, every dev I know who has used Shopify for personal stuff has praised it. And I'm thinking of one person with very high standards.

IDK, I understand why certain apps break all the time now.

It's a restful API and they are apparently going through changes in the URL params. Up until a few days ago, the API magically added extra https:// in front of https:// , so you get https://https:// . Remove one (by hand) and everything works.

Now the params are totally different, so hooray, the app doesn't work at all and I have no clue what the fix is. On top of learning Ruby and all the magic sauce built into Sinatra and the API, it's super irritating to face inconsistencies like this.

Quote

08-04-2017 , 09:46 AM

#29206

kerowo

lolcat

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 37,183

I think you would learn more about an applicants apptitude and culture fit by having them pair program on some easy bug in your code rather than some take home project. This requires a great screening process and probably has some scale issues but is much less gamable than a project you don't watch them code.

Quote

08-04-2017 , 11:22 AM

#29207

suzzer99

Save the Cheerleader, Save the World

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 101,163

Agreed.

Quote

08-04-2017 , 11:23 AM

#29208

jjshabado

Carpal Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 22,732

Quote:

Originally Posted by adios

Leaving an inexperienced developer to their own devices while other departments do code reviews is ****ed up.

It's rare that Adios and I agree on anything. So we should celebrate this!

Quote

08-04-2017 , 11:29 AM

#29209

jjshabado

Carpal Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 22,732

Quote:

Originally Posted by suzzer99

Why not just hire anyone who shows promise to a 3 month contract or something? Or hell a month trial. You know almost immediately with a new dev if they're any good. But white board, interviews, homework projects - can be hit or miss.

A new dev is almost always a net negative on a team in the first month. Too much ramp up and learning before you can do anything super valuable. And that ramp up sucks time/resources away from the people that we already know are good and can get **** done.

Like someone else said too, the majority of good developers can get a good job without jumping through these types of hoops. They can interview at multiple places at the same time and figure out which one they want and get a relatively 'guaranteed' job at the end of it.

There's also the issue with security/IP/etc. Nothing super critical, but its work to deal with correctly (similar to the work you have to do if you regularly use interns).

Quote

08-04-2017 , 12:02 PM

#29210

jjshabado

Carpal Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 22,732

Quote:

Originally Posted by kerowo

This has a lot of problems too:

1. It's still super stressful for the candidate, so you're not really going to get a true feel for how they work.

2. It doesn't let them work with their personal os/environment/tools/etc. Whenever I try to use someone else's IDE set up I look like a complete moron. Random windows/modals popping up because I use short cuts that don't work, typing nonsense characters, etc.

3. It's actually hard (at least for me) to find a steady supply of "good simple bugs". They need to require little to no context for the new person. Be in code that's in a relatively decent shape. Have a fix that's not trivial, but also not too complex. Etc.

4. You have a very different process for each candidate, making it hard to sync expectations and everything properly.

Obviously, the common interview approaches companies use suck in lots of ways too. But I don't think there are any obvious better alternatives.

Quote

08-04-2017 , 01:48 PM

#29211

suzzer99

Save the Cheerleader, Save the World

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 101,163

Lol round 3 of the code review from hell. See if you can spot a problem here.

Code:

   var metaPromise = new Promise(function (resolve,reject){
            unirest.get("http://"+serviceOptions.host+serviceOptions.path).end(function(response){
                if (response.status === 200) {
                    if (response.body !== null && response.body !== undefined) {
                        metadataObj.metadataSuccess = true;
                        resolve();
                    } else {
                        logger.log('error', "Error receiving data from the Metadata service call");
                        metadataObj.metadataSuccess = false;
                        reject();
                    }

Code:

 metaPromise.then(function(){
            return metadataObj;
        }, function(){
            logger.log('error', "attributemetadata service call promise failed");
            return metadataObj;
        });
    }

Last edited by suzzer99; 08-04-2017 at 02:02 PM.

Quote

08-04-2017 , 01:58 PM

#29212

RustyBrooks

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 24,646

I don't even know javascript and even to me that looks wrong/stupid. the caller can't know whether it failed or not, unless somehow metadataobj contains that info

Quote

08-04-2017 , 02:00 PM

#29213

suzzer99

Save the Cheerleader, Save the World

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 101,163

Sorry I left out a piece of the code. See my edit above.

Promises implement a resolve() or reject() method. resolve() goes to the first argument of then(), reject() goes to the second. So that part is correct.

Quote

08-04-2017 , 02:26 PM

#29214

RustyBrooks

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 24,646

ok that is really dumb

ETA: for at least 3 reasons

ETA 2: maybe 4, depending on JS variable scoping

Quote

08-04-2017 , 02:38 PM

#29215

suzzer99

Save the Cheerleader, Save the World

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 101,163

I should have included the outer function:

Code:

module.exports = {
    metadataCall: function(app, logger) {

        const metadataObj = {
            metadataSuccess: null,
            obfuscatedYesInMetadata : []
        };


        var metaPromise = new Promise(function (resolve,reject){
            unirest.get("http://"+serviceOptions.host+serviceOptions.path).end(function(response){
                if (response.status === 200) {
                    if (response.body !== null && response.body !== undefined) {
                         metadataObj.metadataSuccess = true;
                         resolve();
                     } else {
                         logger.log('error', "Error receiving data from the Metadata service call");
                         metadataObj.metadataSuccess = false;
                         reject();
                     }

...

        metaPromise.then(function(){
                return metadataObj;
            }, function(){
                logger.log('error', "attributemetadata service call promise failed");
                return metadataObj;
            });
        }
    }
};

There's no other return statement from metadataCall(). Elsewhere in server.js (node's entry point script):

Code:

/**
 * Making the Metadata call as the server starts to retrieve the data and use it for Profile call
 */
const metadataObject = require("./get-metadata.js").metadataCall(app,logger);

I pointed out to him that his methods in promise.then() are returning metadataObj to nowhere. So I just saw him check in a new PR where he replaces the promise.then() block above with this original:

Code:

 return metadataObj;

Infinite facepalm.

I think the problem is this might actually be working for him, because he's returning metadataObj as a reference, then changing it later when the promise comes back. So even though he's returning a default object, the reference is getting updated with the results of the async call.

Ugh - it's like trying to untangle a crazy person's argument.

Last edited by suzzer99; 08-04-2017 at 02:51 PM.

Quote

08-04-2017 , 02:54 PM

#29216

jjshabado

Carpal Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 22,732

And that's why the politics forum is so good for you!

Quote

08-04-2017 , 05:03 PM

#29217

whb

grinder

Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 481

What are the standard rates for an average dev for: freelance and contract to hire?

I'm going to guess that in hourly rates it's probably freelance > contract to hire. Correct? I'm asking because I just said no to an interview that wanted to hire me as a "contract to hire" but actually doing a freelance gig. At which point, they may or may not hire me or probably would have led to being kept on as a freelancer. If it helps you guys decide, when I asked about the period of time the contract would stipulate, the CEO said "oh there won't be any contracts signed"

I easily responded "oh that's not a contract to hire, that's freelancing". He wasn't aware that it was different. I left shortly after. Would anyone take a fake "contract" for less than 1 weeks time(he kept insinuating it would take less than 1 day )?

Last edited by whb; 08-04-2017 at 05:08 PM. Reason: English

Quote

08-04-2017 , 05:26 PM

#29218

RustyBrooks

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 24,646

Run as fast as you can in the opposite direction. No one does 1 day contract to hires. If there's no contract, you aren't a contractor.

Quote

08-04-2017 , 05:38 PM

#29219

suzzer99

Save the Cheerleader, Save the World

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 101,163

My company's expense report system use's middle out compression to upload receipts. Who says we're not tech leaders!

Quote

08-04-2017 , 05:48 PM

#29220

RustyBrooks

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 24,646

Gonna have to see your weissman score before I decide whether I'm impressed

Quote

08-04-2017 , 06:06 PM

#29221

suzzer99

Save the Cheerleader, Save the World

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 101,163

Quote:

Originally Posted by jjshabado

And that's why the politics forum is so good for you!

I was clean of Politics for over 2 months. The Mooch broke me. In full-blown relapse mode right now.

Quote

08-04-2017 , 06:09 PM

#29222

suzzer99

Save the Cheerleader, Save the World

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 101,163

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustyBrooks

Gonna have to see your weissman score before I decide whether I'm impressed

I uploaded this image to test our lossless compression. NAILED IT

Quote

08-04-2017 , 06:11 PM

#29223

goofyballer

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 70,719

Quote:

Originally Posted by suzzer99

Well this relevant: https://medium.com/@micaksica/your-n...g-f1a3bf831a46

Quote:

One of the more questionable things in Node.js development is that authentication is largely left as an exercise to the individual developer. The de facto authentication solution in the Express.js world is Passport, which offers a host of strategies for authentication. If you want a robust solution similar to Plataformatec’s Devise for Ruby on Rails, you’ll likely be pointed to Auth0, a startup who has made authentication as a service.

Compared to Devise, Passport is simply authentication middleware, and does not handle any of the other parts of authentication for you: that means the Node.js developer is likely to roll their own API token mechanisms, password reset token mechanisms, user authentication routes and endpoints, and views in whatever templating language is the rage today. Because of this, there are a lot of tutorials that specialize in setting up Passport for your Express.js application, and nearly all of them are wrong in some way or another, and none properly implement the full stack necessary for a working web application.

You (I think?) touched on this earlier wrt "why is there no general auth library" but I implemented login-with-Google for a dumb side project I'm working on, using Passport, and I was shocked by how much code I had to write to fit all the glue together that a.) felt like pure boilerplate b.) still isn't even close to production ready (my session store just lives in memory since I haven't gotten around to putting it in a db, so every time I restart it all sessions are invalidated; I'm sure there's dozens of crypto things I should be doing that I'm not doing and that anyone who cared could hack this thing easily; etc). Like, this sort of thing is a serious problem for any developer and it feels like you have to become very educated on the topic just to deliver the most basic auth functionality (assuming reliability and security is a requirement, which they should be).

I spent hours going through one of the aforementioned tutorials about Passport just to do this **** myself, and I'm sure doing it badly.

Last edited by goofyballer; 08-04-2017 at 06:16 PM. Reason: there's probably something funny about posting this on a forum where you log in via plain http

Quote

08-04-2017 , 06:25 PM

#29224

suzzer99

Save the Cheerleader, Save the World

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 101,163

Yeah if you came to me I'd just point you to auth0. Even implementing passport for that is tricky, but much easier than rolling your own auth from scratch. Or Rails or .net.

This is a microcosm of node development. Everyone wants to be a rock star and they like the free-wheeling nature of it. My OS projects aim to make node easier to pick up for new devs who just want to focus on easily spinning up features and business logic. I always felt like something like that would take off eventually but it hasn't. Maybe I'll just start a boilerplate all-in-one auth project build on my nodules idea. Hmmmm...

FWIW - putting your session in a DB is as easy as spinning up redis (or whatever DB you're already using - see stores at the bottom, I wrote the hazelcast one) then pointing express sessions to it at config time. IMO you should develop from day 1 assuming multiple instances of node and shared session state (if you need sessions). Stuff like application-level caching is ok for each instance to just grab it's own copy and story it in local memory.

Just be careful not to accidentally put a request-level property into application scope (IE outside express middleware) - or you'll wind up with a gnarly bug that only shows up in a multi-instance or multi-user scenario. This is the free-wheeling node stuff that keeps me up at night, given the level of developers we sometimes have to work with.

Last edited by suzzer99; 08-04-2017 at 06:36 PM.

Quote

08-04-2017 , 06:27 PM

#29225

Victor

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 81,658

ya and a forum thats been hax0r3d like 5 times including that infamous 2012 episode where it was down for weeks. or mebbe it just felt like weeks. regardless, every single user had to reset their password. ya that was about as much lol 2p2 as possible.