So now we are disputing whether or not state powers have used Science to promote nefarious agendas?
I didn't even realize this part was up for debate:
Quote:
None of this is to deny climate change or the possible severity of its consequences. But ordinary citizens also have a right to be skeptical of an overweening scientism. They know — as all environmentalists should — that history is littered with the human wreckage of scientific errors married to political power.
It's not about climate change being RealScience or FakeScience, it's about people using it as a political tool and whether or not people should use better persuasion techniques than lol ur dumb, you're too stupid to even understand so just listen to me you moron, I can't believe you think Climate Change is Fake you idiot, lol you