It's gonna get even worse. DeadSpin got a hold of the judge's opinion on PSU vs Insurance Company and the judge's opinion on the scandal is rather strong for a mere legal document about insurance coverage.
http://deadspin.com/court-opinion-re...-je-1775014993
The ultimate highlight is bolded:
Quote:
Sandusky was employed by PSU as an Assistant Football Coach and Assistant Professor of Physical Education from 1969 until his retirement in 1999.1 PMA claims Sandusky committed several acts of molestation early in his career at PSU: in 1976, a child allegedly reported to PSU’s Head Football Coach Joseph Paterno, that he (the child) was sexually molested by Sandusky; in 1987, a PSU Assistant Coach is alleged to have witnessed inappropriate contact between Sandusky and a child at a PSU facility; in 1988, another PSU Assistant Coach reportedly witnessed sexual contact between Sandusky and a child; and also in 1988, a child’s report of his molestation by Sandusky was allegedly referred to PSU’s Athletic Director.
The footnote associated with this paragraph is what really emphasizes the gravity of it
Quote:
These events are described in a number of victims' depositions
So it wasn't just a measly line in a document. It was documented across a series of depositions. I guess so many that the judge didn't even bother citing specific depositions.
Most of the rest is legalese regarding insurance clauses and a summary of what is already known about the scandal. It does not focus much on Joe. As a matter of fact, it only mentions him a couple of times in the first few pages of the document. The rest of what is called a cover-up is focused more on Schultz and Spanier.
Last edited by SuperUberBob; 05-06-2016 at 08:18 PM.