[ ] accurate representation of what happened.

Anyone with reading comprehension understands the post I made in whatever college football thread it was, and when you take issue with it, I point that out to you. I get a PM from you titled "FU" that was pure raaaaaaaage because you just looked like an idiot. I'm not sure what the etiquette is on this, but I'll post the PMs if that's ok. Anyways, I reply in a very polite manner asking you to refrain from personal attacks, noting that IF I forwarded that to a mod, you would receive a ban. I once again explain my post and the context, and end it asking you to chill. You reply with some sort of barely readable cluster**** of words, and I ask you to stop PMing me. You don't, instead saying something about how I "called you out" or something, and saying it's dumb that I wonder why everyone calls me a bad poster.

But yeah good job bud.

I think we will need to see the PMs in order to judge this dispute.

Am I allowed to post them? I thought someone got in trouble for that the other day, the croatian guy.

If you both agree to it then it's fine.

If not then just include some horse porn with the PMs when you post them and you'll be fine.

angerpush?

Um, both of our "representations of what happened" are obviously biased. My issue is that you put me itt because of what happened between us in pm. Pretty silly to do that man.

I still don't understand how what I wrote to you would get me banned. Seems like an empty threat to me, definitely not what I'd call "very polite" lol.
I'll go ahead and post that first one:

"dont be an ******* to me when you're the one who said stanford would be undefeated if they didn't play oregon. ****ing genius. awesome insight, thank you"

This may be negligible but the title was "fu" not "FU". Obviously your post paints a picture that puts you in the best possible light and me in the worst, and that's not exactly how it went down.

uscpf

This thread currently has full blown aids, either post the PMs or stfu

Angerpush,

Based on your last post, I think it's safe to say that you would have ended up being named in this thread eventually.

Best,

nutshot2

My first one was above:

His response:

Refrain from personal attacks, if I forwarded this to a mod you'd get banned. I already explained myself in that thread, reread it. We were discussing SOS, he ignored that Stanford had a much better record and wanted Oregon to not count for SOS for some reason. I was contradicting that and you took it out of context. Just chill man

Mine:

I did not take it out of context. I read the ****ing thread. How would I get banned? I didn't personally attack you; I said don't be an ******* and called you a ****ing genius. Last time I checked, those weren't personal attacks. Try again.

His:

I have nothing else to say to you. Don't pm me again.

Mine:

Don't unnecessarily call me out in a thread. At least I had the decency to pm you. And you wonder why you're nominated so often in the worst SE poster thread

the majority of you suck

uscpf

angerpush

do u guys go to the same high school?

an 18 year old who is into pink floyd? wtf

yea obv this is just an elaborate troll by both of us concocted bc we're bored. lil jeremy is the best buddy ever!!!

What's wrong with that?

Anytime I ever said franchise needs to be redacted

cool stories brahs

pandaslide.gif it A+

this is the 'who are the bad SE p0sters thread?', not 'bad p0sters in SE please post here' thread

angerpush
angerpush
angerpush
angerpush
angerpush

Seriously I asked you a while ago, stop PMing me.

If you ignore him he can't send you pms.