Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS
View Poll Results: It's the Eastern Conference Finals; Do you know where your sister-in-law is?
MARRRRRRRRRRRTTTTTTTTYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
19 41.30%
Yes
5 10.87%
No
4 8.70%
lol canada
15 32.61%
Most un-biased OP ever
4 8.70%
How many cups could a Kovalchuk win if a Kovalchuk could Kovalcup?
9 19.57%
lol flyers
18 39.13%
bastard
3 6.52%
THE New York Rangers
13 28.26%
Bible lied. There's more than one devil
8 17.39%

05-23-2012 , 11:28 PM
Tom Gulitti ‏@TGfireandice

Brodeur on crowd chant: “That was great. That’s as loud as they’ve done. If I come back for Game 7, I hope they are going to do better.”
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-23-2012 , 11:45 PM
what a failfest on goal #4 by the rangers' forwards, holy lord:

http://watch.tsn.ca/featured/#clip685327
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-24-2012 , 12:18 AM
lol EC
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-24-2012 , 12:35 AM




NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-24-2012 , 05:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hold'em 07
senorcrapital awfully silent now
Had to get up early so I went to sleep. Regardless, what's that now? Oh, right, lolrangers. Come back from 3 down only to lose by 2 anyways. What a crappy team
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-24-2012 , 06:52 AM
I missed most of the game last night. Did Richards take any more ****s?

NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-24-2012 , 10:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigdottawa
I missed most of the game last night. Did Richards take any more ****s?
pretty sure that's what he was doing on carter's goal
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-24-2012 , 10:36 AM
It's only a matter of time before Torts makes the ultimate line- Kreider-Dubi-Hagelin

I'm already compiled a list of potential nicknames for it. My favorite is the MAM line (mass-alaska-michigan)
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-24-2012 , 11:01 AM
I liked how last night one of the Devils lined up Kreider for a hit and didn't quite get the job done. One of the broadcasters said, "Good thing for him that wasn't Scott Stevens." and then Emrick said, "Or it wasn't a Boston Terrier blah blah blah hahahahaha!!". Because Kreider went to BC I guess. You know what, we're all real impressed that you know where everyone went to college, but shut the **** up Doc, you don't have to do that every time.
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-24-2012 , 11:02 AM
Word is Gaborik will make a Messier-like Game 6 Guarantee

"If We Win, It Will Not Be Because of My Play"
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-24-2012 , 11:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy Proffett
I liked how last night one of the Devils lined up Kreider for a hit and didn't quite get the job done. One of the broadcasters said, "Good thing for him that wasn't Scott Stevens." and then Emrick said, "Or it wasn't a Boston Terrier blah blah blah hahahahaha!!". Because Kreider went to BC I guess. You know what, we're all real impressed that you know where everyone went to college, but shut the **** up Doc, you don't have to do that every time.
haha

there's also that no one has ever called them the "Boston" Terriers, would either say BU or Boston University. if you said you played college hockey at "Boston", no one would know what you were talking about.
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-24-2012 , 11:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nyc999
Word is Gaborik will make a Messier-like Game 6 Guarantee

"If We Win, It Will Not Be Because of My Play"
That's a pretty short suicide note
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-24-2012 , 11:24 AM
etats, you need to pull a reverse celtic pride on gaborik
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-24-2012 , 12:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nyc999
Word is Gaborik will make a Messier-like Game 6 Guarantee

"If We Win, It Will Not Be Because of My Play"
gabby did relatively well yesterday. like way more active, he was forechecking and backchecking consistently... definitely took the demotion to heart.
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-24-2012 , 12:28 PM
he almost put a shot on goal, too
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-24-2012 , 12:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Triumph36
he almost put a shot on goal, too
that almost sog resulted in a goal.
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-24-2012 , 01:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DcifrThs
that almost sog resulted in a goal.
yeah i'm sure he can repeat it, too.
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-24-2012 , 02:18 PM
definitely sustainable
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-24-2012 , 04:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Triumph36
what a failfest on goal #4 by the rangers' forwards, holy lord:

http://watch.tsn.ca/featured/#clip685327
Forwards? That goal was all on Girardi who is supposed to be in front of the net on that play.

If nothing else that game should put a stop to the "lucky bounces" and "won a game they shouldnt" nonsense. Total domination by the Rangers after the time out and the Devils had the benefit of every bounce and post. With the same effort its going to game 7.
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-24-2012 , 04:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Triumph36
yeah i'm sure he can repeat it, too.
Too bad you didnt even know he scored.
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-24-2012 , 04:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Copernicus
Total domination by the Rangers after the time out and the Devils had the benefit of every bounce and post.
what the hell is that?
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-24-2012 , 04:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShimmyBasis
what the hell is that?
devils scored 3 goals. torts called a time out in the first. rangers played like a different team thereafter.
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-24-2012 , 04:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Triumph36
yeah i'm sure he can repeat it, too.
gabby scored a pretty sick # of points from on/behind the redline. he has an awareness of where/when to toss a puck to the goalie. ofc he got lucky as hell here b/c fatty fat fattness's fat foot ended up on the puck (i mean jeez...even his skates are fat lol) but it is 100% repeatable as he's shown in the regular season.

now if he can bring that to the playoffs maybe we'd actually breeze through a game or two.

we REALLY need that scoring now so c'mon gabby. do something.
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-24-2012 , 04:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Copernicus
Too bad you didnt even know he scored.
yes, i did. i did also know that that would not have been counted as a shot had it not gone in (and that it was basically knocked in by another ranger pushing brodeur)
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote
05-24-2012 , 04:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Copernicus
Forwards? That goal was all on Girardi who is supposed to be in front of the net on that play.

If nothing else that game should put a stop to the "lucky bounces" and "won a game they shouldnt" nonsense. Total domination by the Rangers after the time out and the Devils had the benefit of every bounce and post. With the same effort its going to game 7.
yeah girardi's supposed to let the devils get a 2 on 1 down low. you never see two defensemen behind the net and forwards supporting those defensemen. how long have you studied hockey to know this?

NJ deserves to be up 3-2 in this series, and again, when the score was tied, the devils were the better team. when the rangers actually start to outplay the devils with the score tied is when i'll get worried.
NHL Playoffs ECF - NJ "Do we send a card to the ex-sister-in-law?" vs THE NEW YORK RANGERS Quote

      
m