Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread

10-09-2008 , 02:31 PM
I really like both randle and green. Green was the guy i was heavily considering instead of thomas. not sure i agree randle > sapp, but its fairly negligible. well done
NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread Quote
10-09-2008 , 02:34 PM
John Randle was the one guy I considered over Sapp. In the end, it came down to stuffing the run and size. The only knock on JR is that you are pretty much forced to run a 4-3 with a meaty second DT. Otherwise the dude was awesome.

Those MIN defenses were nuts, they didn't even play the run like teams do today. It was pretty much head upfield and tackle anyone that got in your way.
NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread Quote
10-09-2008 , 02:35 PM
I'm kinda surprised that my team is OT/CB after two picks.
NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread Quote
10-09-2008 , 02:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by capone0
Can I pm anyone my next 5 or so guys to pick just in case I'm gone. Anyone going to be available.
if its allowed, sure
NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread Quote
10-09-2008 , 02:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by battschr
Who is tied w/ NAME REDACTED?
Darrell Green, most seasons w/one team
NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread Quote
10-09-2008 , 02:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by capone0
PM a list of great corners left please. There aren't many HOF level corners or safeties available in this draft.
There are two corners that probably should get in the HOF, I don't think it will happen though. The NFL HOF is too exclusive and defensive backs are among the least represented. By great players I wasn't talking about that level. To get into the HOF as a db you have to play like 12+ years, be an all pro 7+ times, win superbowls, return kicks at an elite level, etc. The standards are too high.
NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread Quote
10-09-2008 , 02:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nath
Darrell Green, most seasons w/one team
Um, shoot, can't edit anymore. Sorry, just C/P'ed that.
NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread Quote
10-09-2008 , 02:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by vixticator
There are two corners that probably should get in the HOF, I don't think it will happen though. The NFL HOF is too exclusive and defensive backs are among the least represented. By great players I wasn't talking about that level. To get into the HOF as a db you have to play like 12+ years, be an all pro 7+ times, win superbowls, return kicks at an elite level, etc. The standards are too high.
Exactly there are a lot of solid corners but not many elite ones, honestly most of the elite DBs have already been taken especially the ones with a long time spent in the league. I'm not a huge fan of picking a CB early in this type of league but I can see justifying the 4 guys who were selected although I think Bailey went way too high.
NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread Quote
10-09-2008 , 02:52 PM
No prob. People have been pretty sloppy about it so far, though, and we're getting to the point where it actually matters.

Edit: re: battschr, naming undrafted players, &c.
NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread Quote
10-09-2008 , 02:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by vixticator
There are two corners that probably should get in the HOF, I don't think it will happen though. The NFL HOF is too exclusive and defensive backs are among the least represented. By great players I wasn't talking about that level. To get into the HOF as a db you have to play like 12+ years, be an all pro 7+ times, win superbowls, return kicks at an elite level, etc. The standards are too high.
they put in 5-7 people each year, baseball is way more exclusive with 0-3 a year
NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread Quote
10-09-2008 , 02:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bottomset
they put in 5-7 people each year, baseball is way more exclusive with 0-3 a year
There are a lot more players, though.
NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread Quote
10-09-2008 , 02:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by battschr
There are a lot more players, though.
And a disproportionate # of HoFers are at the easily quantified offensive positions (QB/WR/RB)
NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread Quote
10-09-2008 , 02:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bottomset
they put in 5-7 people each year, baseball is way more exclusive with 0-3 a year
5-7 people but there are 22 starters and 4 or so special teams players vs 8 starting baseman + pitchers. Really there are some big suprises in the HOF, and there are some guys who had a ton of records that took forever to get in. QBs are way overrepresented and DBs, LBers, O-line and D-line underrepresented.
NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread Quote
10-09-2008 , 03:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nath
And a disproportionate # of HoFers are at the easily quantified offensive positions (QB/WR/RB)
QFT, the 5th best QB/RR of any generation will at least be considered for the hall. For most other positions you had to be THE BEST for at least 5 years.
NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread Quote
10-09-2008 , 03:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SHARK DOCTOR
Can anyone actually argue my points...instead of just saying the first thing that comes to mind, and repeating the same thing over. "there were better QBs available"....sure - but none of which carry McNabbs attributes! (at least not at that high of a level as he does). Read the previous posts...I have refuted/explained just about every point against McNabb made in this thread successfully!

I really think McNabb is the Rodney Dangerfield of this draft...no respect!

This whole thread is about arguing your point - and explaining your pick (as I have done)...yet no one can argue against what I have said...so they just say "there were better QBs left".

I expect more from you JoA as a frequent SE poster.

Alright. You're asking for a good argument, and I'll try to provide one...



Quote:
I picked McNabb because I wanted to protect my first round pick of Randy Moss...and not only protect him - but make him the best he could be...make him untouchable!
As I told Needle, I hate the concept of picking players to fit into a scheme or to fit into your team this early. Sure I'd advise doing that in the mid/late rounds when each draft pick runs close in value. However, there are only so many top tier talents in this draft, so I would advise not thinking at all about scheme or team chemistry just yet and just drafting BPA. Otherwise, you're going to end up with too little talent compared to other teams.


Quote:
People complaining about Moss needing someone with leadership, character and someone who demands respect
I think this is a common misunderstanding. Now I could be wrong, as its tough for me to get into guys' like Moss' heads. However, I'm pretty sure that when Moss does something stupid(admit he doesn't give 100%, fake moon green bay fans, walk off the field early) he isn't thinking to himself "I wonder who the leaders on my team are. Will they let me get away with this?"

Moss has a history of causing some problems. Now hes certainly not the worst player in the league when it comes to this(and I did like the Moss pick remember!). However, I think you're fighting an uphill battle if you want to claim that you're suddenly going to erase all his problems with one draft pick.


Quote:
McNabb brings all that - plus more.
This is where you really start to lose me....

1. McNabb publicly fueded with his only big time WR he ever had
2. McNabb's leadership and toughness have been questioned, particularly in the super bowl loss.
3. McNabb's leadership and clutchess were quesioned in the continued NFC Championship game losses
4. McNabb has frequently been booed by his home towns, and although I'll admit Philly fans can be idiots at times, there are Philly players who don't get booed.


Now let me be clear: I'm not saying that McNabb is necessarily a bad leader or that hes even below average. However for you to go on and on about how McNabb is great at all these things just strikes me as strange. There are plenty of undrafted QBs out there who have a better reputation as a leader(and lets be honest- none of us have ever been in the locker room, so all we're going off of is reputation and history with teamates here).


Quote:
Donovan brings a cannon of an arm, and with that cannon he brings pin point accuracy. Thats a huge gift for Moss.
Again, I totally disagree. Moss's biggest strength is that you can get any QB with a strong arm to just heave it up to him and he can make a play on a ball even if its not accurate at all. In fact, it would seem to me that my pick(Jerry Rice) would benefit from an accurate QB a lot more than Moss. I can think of one QB in particular who Moss had in real life who wasn't very good but had a great arm and he just lobbed it up for Moss and had great success.

If I were you, I would've focused on o-line so that Moss' deep routes have time to develop, and then just get a mediocre QB who can lob it up to him.

Moreoever, as I said earlier, I always thought accuracy was McNabb's biggest weakness, and while I now understand you were specifically talking about the deep ball I still don't think hes in the top tier of this draft in deep ball accuracy.


Quote:
Along with that precsion like cannon, the guy could flat out run...and you wouldnt think that considering his frame (6'2", 240lbs). I havnt seem many (if any) QBs running outside of the pocket at full speed to only rifle down a 70 yard pass out of position withtout their feet set...and have it perfectly placed into the widerecievers hands in stride.
Agreed here that McNabb is great at running and keeping his eyes downfield. Sometimes I do think he makes the mistake of not taking off with the ball himself though. Furthermore I can think of a few other QBs still available with similar or better rushing ability.

Quote:
Randy will have a lot of fun with this.
Again, a competant o-line could've bought the QB just as much time for the route to develop in addittion to helping the run game and anchoring the entire team. I can think of a few o-linemen I much rather would've had than McNabb.


Quote:
Ok - lets get this straight...the guy could throw for 70 yards with ease....the guy could throw for 70 yards with precision...the guy could run and scramble like not many out there...and could throw with precision for 70 yards while on the run.
Again, much of that is simply not necessary with Moss who you can just throw a wild jump ball to and hope he goes up and gets it. Even still, there will be plenty of QBs available late who can throw an accurate deep ball if you give them an o-line that gives them tons of time to throw and a nice pocket.

Quote:
How this guy is still available boggles my mind. In baseball terms - the guys a 5 tool player, he can do it all!
Oh come on....if you want to argue that you know it was a reach but it was a good fit, then thats one thing(even though I disagree). However, you simply can't argue that he was a steal. Hell you even said in your first paragraph that there are more accomplished QBs still out there. Which QBs already taken exactly do you think McNabb should've gone over?

Quote:
He doesnt play for the stats or the spotlight - he plays for his team, he plays for his teammates and he just straight up plays to win! Hes a compettior to the fullest degree,
fluff

Quote:
and has played for many years now without the aid of a #1 WR. (with the exception of one year - and coincidentally put up career numbers up that year )
agreed. Always liked McNabb due to this...just not as much as you apparently do.


Quote:
Now - the point of me needing a mobile QB with an arm was a huge factor in making the trade up for Donovan, tehre was no one else who fit the bill more prefectly than him, and I just didnt feel like taking that risk. I knew I couldnt settle for a pocket QB like Favre or Marino, since many would argue that my OLine was not strong enough and it would be a sackathon playing against my team (it could be strong enough....but, considering Im passing up on the first 3 rounds withtout a top flight O-Lineman might come into play here). Anyway - I had to make an excutive decision...do I make Randy (and my passing game) unstoppable? and get a top flight QB?...or do I get protection for my decent level QB since Randy will catch everything anyway, and grab an OLineman? I went for unstoppable...with a pinch of scrambleness.
I understand what you're saying, but I think you far overrate this. I can't name names, but again look at that one great armed QB he had in Minny who wasn't mobile at all. Its not like it takes 10 seconds for Moss to get 40 yards downfield. Just have a decent pass blocking scheme and you can chuck it up to him.
NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread Quote
10-09-2008 , 03:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dudd
Damn, I was hoping Randle would get majorly overlooked and slip to the back end of the second round. Looks like I was not alone.
Meh on the Randle pick. He was on my radar for sure, but hes such a one dimensional player. I'd much rather build around complete players in the first few rounds so that your hand isn't forced later on. I feel as if you almost have to take some good run stuffing LBs early on now with Randle on the team.
NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread Quote
10-09-2008 , 03:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by battschr
Uhhhhhh....Darrell Green for me.
good pick, love it as a Skins fan too. Very interesting:



Redskins have 2 SB wins in the era we are drafting from(and one right before the era, and many of those players played into our era), yet this is the first one taken. I can't really think of anyone who should've gone higher though, so I'm not complaining...makes you appriciate Gibbs a little more though.
NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread Quote
10-09-2008 , 03:56 PM
Round 2- Pick 37-Randall McDaniel-Age 30-1994






Simply The best guard to ever play in the NFL (imo of course), He went to an astonishing 12 straight pro bowls (in 3 different decades!) and 7 first team all pro teams. He did his job quietly, and not flashy, but he sure got the job done. He started 202 straight games, from 1990-01. Named by one site as the greatest athlete to wear the number 64 ever, his athleticism revolutionized the guard position. A wise man once said, NFL games are won and lost in the trenches, and thats were i start with Warren Sapp and Randall McDaniel.

Team ZJ123
Warren Sapp
Randall McDaniel
NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread Quote
10-09-2008 , 03:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EPiPeN11
sick pick was dreaming of him and champ together
While I did debate the Champ pick with you, I admit that would've been a very cool strategy.
NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread Quote
10-09-2008 , 03:59 PM
so we have to wait for Needle now or did he say he can pick via his cell?
NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread Quote
10-09-2008 , 04:00 PM
Theres 2 guys out there I want, might be interested in trading up....wouldn't give up a ton, maybe something similar to the first trade that went down. Let me know if anyone is interested.
NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread Quote
10-09-2008 , 04:02 PM
"Can return kicks, also. "

Just pointing out that I specifically mentioned that this will not factor in whatsoever.
NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread Quote
10-09-2008 , 04:04 PM
Yeah, I can think of at least one strong-armed mobile QB who would have been available in another round, maybe two

Even if you don't think he's as good a fit, I still think you could've gotten McNabb without trading up

McNabb is the Chauncey Billups of our league imo
NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread Quote
10-09-2008 , 04:05 PM
Blah I should have traded down, so much sick value in the past 10 picks.
NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread Quote
10-09-2008 , 04:07 PM
Dammit, I guess McDaniel wasn't falling. I didn't think he'd go this high, but I like the pick.

I may have to seriously re-evaluate who I can expect to be available at 60.
NFL Modern Era Draft: Discussion Thread Quote

      
m