Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
MNF: Pats v. Ravens MNF: Pats v. Ravens

12-04-2007 , 01:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dynasty
Brady on the failed 4th down QB sneak in which the Ravens called the timeout:

"I heard the whistle blow. I'd have gotten the first down if the whistle didn't blow"
tom brady is pretty godly so i believe him
MNF: Pats v. Ravens Quote
12-04-2007 , 01:10 AM
ok lets get this clear. The pass in the endzone on the 4th down holding play was intended for who? the holding was on what player? the answer to these two is different, correct?
MNF: Pats v. Ravens Quote
12-04-2007 , 01:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dknightx
ok lets get this clear. The pass in the endzone on the 4th down holding play was intended for who? the holding was on what player? the answer to these two is different, correct?
Watson and Watson, I believe. I haven't looked at the replay, though.
MNF: Pats v. Ravens Quote
12-04-2007 , 01:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dynasty
Brady on the failed 4th down QB sneak in which the Ravens called the timeout:

"I heard the whistle blow. I'd have gotten the first down if the whistle didn't blow"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponies
tom brady is pretty godly so i believe him
I believe him too. Sigh.
MNF: Pats v. Ravens Quote
12-04-2007 , 01:12 AM
Listening to Patriots haters makes being a Patriots fan so awesome, btw. You guys are so adorable. Hate away.
MNF: Pats v. Ravens Quote
12-04-2007 , 01:12 AM
I normally like the way Tom Brady carries himself in his press conferences, despite hating his team with a burning passion.

Seemed extra-douchey tonight. Kinda surprising, I'm thinking he might be starting to believe this hype about "best of all time" either for the team or him...

[/Indy fan commentary]
MNF: Pats v. Ravens Quote
12-04-2007 , 01:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kneel B4 Zod
yes, b/c the 89 niners and 85 bears were able to beat everyone handily.

oh wait
I don't think the Sportsworld sucked their d!ck as much as the sportsworld is sucking the Pats off right now. Also, the Pats still have to win 7 more games, and they've already been called the best show ever.
MNF: Pats v. Ravens Quote
12-04-2007 , 01:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dknightx
ok lets get this clear. The pass in the endzone on the 4th down holding play was intended for who? the holding was on what player? the answer to these two is different, correct?
Watson, not sure, it doesnt matter
MNF: Pats v. Ravens Quote
12-04-2007 , 01:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boris
tom brady still being a biatch in the press conference.
QFMFT.

He has no problem talking to the media when they are plowing teams by 30, but now that they've looked very mortal he's trying to get out of there.
MNF: Pats v. Ravens Quote
12-04-2007 , 01:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dknightx
ok lets get this clear. The pass in the endzone on the 4th down holding play was intended for who? the holding was on what player? the answer to these two is different, correct?
It doesn't matter, you can't hold anyone past 5 yards. It wasn't a pass interference call.
MNF: Pats v. Ravens Quote
12-04-2007 , 01:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyro
Listening to Patriots haters makes being a Patriots fan so awesome, btw. You guys are so adorable. Hate away.
qft
MNF: Pats v. Ravens Quote
12-04-2007 , 01:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by capone0
I don't think the Sportsworld sucked their d!ck as much as the sportsworld is sucking the Pats off right now. Also, the Pats still have to win 7 more games, and they've already been called the best show ever.
thats mainly a function of the change in the sportsworld now vs then

the media now is just a whole lot more obnoxious
MNF: Pats v. Ravens Quote
12-04-2007 , 01:14 AM
ok... I have had 20 mins or so to think about this all and I can say confidently that is the craziest finish I have seen almost ever. Def top 3 all time.
MNF: Pats v. Ravens Quote
12-04-2007 , 01:15 AM
look the holding call by definition was holding.

however, the same thing applies as at the end of a basketball game on a final shot- unless it is absolutely horribly blatant and a SIGNIFICANT advantage was gained it should not be called. let them play.

by youre analysis there would be holding/ illegal contact every play, because it is textbook.

call was horrible because of game situation not because it wasnt holding "by definition"
MNF: Pats v. Ravens Quote
12-04-2007 , 01:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyro
Listening to Patriots haters makes being a Patriots fan so awesome, btw. You guys are so adorable. Hate away.
indeed.
MNF: Pats v. Ravens Quote
12-04-2007 , 01:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kneel B4 Zod
thats mainly a function of the change in the sportsworld now vs then

the media now is just a whole lot more obnoxious
QFT. I don't recall hating other good teams the same way I have hated good teams in the last 10 years or so.
MNF: Pats v. Ravens Quote
12-04-2007 , 01:16 AM
on 5th quarter they are saying Brady got the 4th on the timeout play.

also the holding was on Gaffney on the Watson play, not Watson
MNF: Pats v. Ravens Quote
12-04-2007 , 01:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kneel B4 Zod
yes, b/c the 89 niners and 85 bears were able to beat everyone handily.

oh wait
85 bears uuh yeah? they lost that one game but i think the pats are going to lost at some point, probably next week or in the playoffs.
MNF: Pats v. Ravens Quote
12-04-2007 , 01:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Edge34
I normally like the way Tom Brady carries himself in his press conferences, despite hating his team with a burning passion.

Seemed extra-douchey tonight. Kinda surprising, I'm thinking he might be starting to believe this hype about "best of all time" either for the team or him...

[/Indy fan commentary]

The first three questions were Balt. media trying to trap him into saying something that could get him fined.
MNF: Pats v. Ravens Quote
12-04-2007 , 01:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by yeotaJMU
look the holding call by definition was holding.

however, the same thing applies as at the end of a basketball game on a final shot- unless it is absolutely horribly blatant and a SIGNIFICANT advantage was gained it should not be called. let them play.

by youre analysis there would be holding/ illegal contact every play, because it is textbook.

call was horrible because of game situation not because it wasnt holding "by definition"
HE WAS AS CLOSE TO RIDING ON HIS BACK AS POSSIBLE ASJDASJKLJDKLAJDKLAJDLKAJDKLAJDKLJAKLDJKLAJDKLAD
MNF: Pats v. Ravens Quote
12-04-2007 , 01:17 AM
Yay, more Emmitt commentary.
MNF: Pats v. Ravens Quote
12-04-2007 , 01:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by yeotaJMU
look the holding call by definition was holding.

however, the same thing applies as at the end of a basketball game on a final shot- unless it is absolutely horribly blatant and a SIGNIFICANT advantage was gained it should not be called. let them play.

by youre analysis there would be holding/ illegal contact every play, because it is textbook.

call was horrible because of game situation not because it wasnt holding "by definition"
There are two very real options that apply to your analysis:

1) You haven't even watched the replay yet
2) You're just being hilarious/wrong
MNF: Pats v. Ravens Quote
12-04-2007 , 01:18 AM
ok the controversial hold was on Jabar Gaffney, not Watson. I guess some guy had both his hands gripping on hijm, I need to see the replay
MNF: Pats v. Ravens Quote
12-04-2007 , 01:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by shipitkthx
HE WAS AS CLOSE TO RIDING ON HIS BACK AS POSSIBLE ASJDASJKLJDKLAJDKLAJDLKAJDKLAJDKLJAKLDJKLAJDKLAD


no homer he wasnt. i just watched the replay.
MNF: Pats v. Ravens Quote
12-04-2007 , 01:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurollo
ok... I have had 20 mins or so to think about this all and I can say confidently that is the craziest finish I have seen almost ever. Def top 3 all time.
No way this was crazier than the Bills/Cowboys finish, right? I'm struggling to remember the details at the moment, but I remember it was pretty nuts.
MNF: Pats v. Ravens Quote

      
m