AFC Wildcard: 1.Chargers @ Cincinnati Bengals (-6.5, 47.5) - Page 57 - Sporting Events and Fantasy Sports

Two Plus Two Forums Sports and Games Sporting Events

AFC Wildcard: 1.Chargers @ Cincinnati Bengals (-6.5, 47.5)

View Poll Results: Who ya got?

Bengals

47 47.00%

1. Chargers

33 33.00%

DAAAAAALTAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHN!

21 21.00%

RIIIIIIIIIIIIVAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHS

24 24.00%

MAAAAAARVVVVVVVVVIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN

19 19.00%

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 57 of 57

First

7 37 47 52 53 54 55 56 57

Last

Page 57 of 57

First

7 37 47 52 53 54 55 56 57

Last

01-06-2014 , 08:58 PM

#1401

TeeJayOrTJ

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 5,380

Well maybe if you had an HDVT you would enjoy watching random games. Especially random games on a Thursday like the one where Geno Atkins got carted off.

And the point is you take everything too literally. Your way of thinking is so rigid that it makes you a horrible poster

Quote

01-06-2014 , 09:08 PM

#1402

A-Rod's Cousin

banned

Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 37,130

I missed that Thursday game because I was innoculating infants in Sri Lanka. Don't you feel awful now?

Quote

01-06-2014 , 09:16 PM

#1403

TeeJayOrTJ

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 5,380

Nope, you are still a horrible poster

Quote

01-06-2014 , 11:07 PM

#1404

grenzen

veteran

Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 2,402

Quote:

Originally Posted by A-Rod's Cousin

Wow, TV smack, that's fresh.

I didn't play FF this year so I'm not really actively keeping track of team defenses. The Bengals also weren't exactly a primetime team this year so I didn't see them a lot. And the team I watch most didn't play them. But yeah, if I owned an HDTV I would have known. Sweet logic.

My #1 WR argument... refresh me... is that where I said there are, by definition, 32 #1 WRs in the NFL? Yeah, super dumb argument there. Dare I take the literal definition of the phrase "number one" and apply it correctly! I think what most people were arguing about there would be a "franchise #1", which is obviously different. There are 32 "#1 QBs" in the world, theoretically, but only like ~10ish "franchise QBs" at any given time. I think that's the equivalent of what they were arguing, which I agree with. I never said there were 32 WRs in the league that you "build around" or whatever. That's just something morons like you projected. What I said was not close to being inaccurate.

LOL, you wasted all that time writing a kindergarden story just to suck us in to hear you call somebody a moron.

Quote

01-07-2014 , 02:16 AM

#1405

ntanygd760

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 14,097

Can't we focus on what is important, how awesome Phillip River is and that ginger, well he is a ginger, 2 ints and 1 fumble ftw

Quote

01-07-2014 , 08:19 AM

#1406

clowntable

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 45,557

Freest money ever for anyone that watched the last 5 or so games of both teams? I dunno but it sure feels like it :P

Quote

01-08-2014 , 10:43 PM

#1407

brandoncla

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 5,728

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shark Sandwich

Well given that their defense was anywhere from below average to historically awful throughout the year, and given that Weddle is an elite safety, the rest of their secondary would have to be literal grade schoolers for your statement to be accurate

below average to historically awful... GTFO!

(their secondary is their weak spot, but even they are playing better than they were)