Im actually really confused about chiefsplanet too and if anybody would be so kind as to address it without trolling...

LOL man the same Paul Ryan "hey so this program is good for olds, like all the old people who are my voters, but we need to **** over everyone under 55, but actually these changes will be good for them, SO GOOD and SO NECESSARY, but not good or necessary enough for olds, who, again, will have nothing change" plan, right down to the same whining that he'll call his new, much worse program the same name so it's UNFAIR to Jeb!'s FEELINGS to accurately describe his policy.



The lesson of 2012 apparently was that the only thing wrong with the Ryan plan was Paul Ryan.

lol

Dude there are a lot of NFL and CFB message boards, why did this 1 randomly become the 1 stop shop?

I'm sorry I'm not well versed on the history of Chiefs planet.

BAAAAhahahahahahahaha

this is one of the dumbest things ever typed on this forum

It makes sense that a site like that would be able to drive traffic by having a section for people like that, however, Chiefs of all teams seems a little weird.

Like a roll tide site would be way better positioned I'd think.

It's a long story, but basically it's all suzzer's fault. If he had just kept his trainer we might have been able to avoid it.

One of the posters posts on that board. For whatever reason it's become an avatar of dumb Conservativism. In reality to could go to any board in a Conservative area and you'll run into the same thing, Chiefsplanet isn't unique.

I wonder who is farther from the center of us politics, chiefs planet to the right or 2+2 to the left? I think these discussion boards/groups often break to one side or the other as it is easier to be in the dominant group. However if you run me and Ikes and the few others who are not communists out completely this thing crumbles. Somebody will start a thread, 15 people will +1 the OP and poof this place looks like the limit hold em threads.

Whoever started the site probably encouraged and participated in such conversation in the beginning instead of banning or limiting topics. Someone who post there should consider inviting them to register here and give Unchained a whirl.

Limit hold em is fun.

I prefer it myself.

An article at reason.com

Jeb's Comments on Medicare

It appears Jeb has stepped in it. I thought you Dem supporters were stating that Jeb was one of the few Repubs that had a chance to beat Hillary. You guys are sneaky.

I'm sure ikes will be along to lol reason lol adios for being able to read

Agreed, group think is bad.

You could write a whole thesis on why some groups tend toward extremes. I think once a minority group gets below a critical mass, the members take their ball and go home because not many people like talking to themselves. We saw this here in politardia when all the lolanarchycapitalists departed en masse.

KC football fans probably lean pretty conservative, and the mods running the show see no problem calling black people monkeys; eventually liberals and moderates get tired of the blatant hate speech and the Overton window gradually shifts to absurdity.

I pop in now and then to piss in the wind and get a few lulz, but when people start posting jack-off fantasies about shooting migrant children, I take my ball and go home.

I am glad Bush is talking about entitlement spending/underfunding. Maybe Hillary will address too.

Which group is further from the center makes no difference when the bat**** crazy starts just right of center.

I agree it makes no differece. Head on over to CP and straighten them out.

They must atleast like Jamaal Charles and Justin Houston

I missed anarcho capitalists but became interested in this thread as Ron Paul was the thing. I have to admit it was fun ravaging those guys.

My point is I'm happy to be further from the center when the center is pretty close to being insane.

Your point was that this forum is worse/the same as CP because we might be further from the center....?

Are you saying that you prefer your own political views to others? Shocking news man. I was really just pointing out groups seem to break one way and are not representative if the whole.

Except he's not. This is the whole "repeal and replace, but we don't have a clue what with" nonsense R-tards spewed about obamacare. They're literally the party of no ideas.

Yes, I prefer sane people to crazy violence prone bigots.

Lol. Nobody is talking specifics at this point. I pointed that out in the Hillary thread the other day. Just mentioning entitlements is risky. The Dems are playing head in the sand on this cause proposing higher taxes is unpopular.