Who Will Be the 2012 Republican Presidential Nominee? - Page 557 - Politics and Economics

Two Plus Two Forums Other Topics Politics

Who Will Be the 2012 Republican Presidential Nominee?

...

Page 557 of 865

First

57 357 457 507 537 547 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 567 577 607 657 757

Last

Page 557 of 865

First

57 357 457 507 537 547 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 567 577 607 657 757

Last

12-12-2011 , 02:13 PM

#13901

Ineedaride2

Politics Court Jester

Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 25,080

Quote:

Politics Forum Festivus Celebration -- AIRING OF GRIEVANCES -- DO NOT POST ITT W/O READING OP

....

THIS THREAD WILL OPEN MONDAY MORNING.

I got a lotta problems with ElliotR.

12-12-2011 , 02:18 PM

#13902

The 13th 4postle

banned

Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 11,244

Quote:

Originally Posted by starkwired

It's not that piece in particular, it's the fact that there's literally no one else in the race left to turn to and they gotta turn somewhere.

*Cough* Ron Paul *Cough*

12-12-2011 , 02:25 PM

#13903

Ineedaride2

Politics Court Jester

Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 25,080

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wynton

This made me LOL.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...r_postpolitics

Didn't Paul mention he should return the money?

Am I crazy, or did Paul's comment invoke another round of slap fighting between Newt and Romney?

"Tuesday, NewtRomney was seen at an upscale restaurant in Washington D.C. beating himself about the face and head."

12-12-2011 , 02:28 PM

#13904

Scary_Tiger

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 21,487

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ineedaride2

Didn't Paul mention he should return the money?

Ron Paul: Gingrich taking Freddie Mac money 'immoral'

Pretty amazing the article ignored that aspect. Watching CNN now and they're writing Paul out of this story too.

12-12-2011 , 02:42 PM

#13905

punter11235

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 8,210

Ok, afte IQ it's time for "honesty rantings". Rate presidential contenders in order from the most honest to least honest. It doesn't matter how dumb they are it matters if they have "clean" intentions like doing what they say, not lying, not being corrupted etc. In absence of evidence the vibe counts too.
Here is mine:
1.Ron Paul
2.Rick Pery/Jon Huntsman
3.Mitt Romney
4.Rick Santorum
5.Michelle Bachmann
6.Herman Cain
7.Newt Gingrich

I have no reason to think top 3 aren't equally honest but RP get points for the vibe. Virtually nobody believes he might be corrupted.

12-12-2011 , 02:46 PM

#13906

General Tsao

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 30,575

i think Rick Santorum should be #2

romney at bottom with gingrich

RP
Santorum
Huntsman
Bachmann
Cain
Gingrich
Romney

12-12-2011 , 02:48 PM

#13907

Scary_Tiger

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 21,487

Quote:

Originally Posted by punter11235

I have no reason to think top 3 aren't equally honest but RP get points for the vibe. Virtually nobody believes he might be corrupted.

I'd say Paul and Santorum have the strongest records for honesty. I don't think Bachmann or Huntsman have any real big issues on their record, but they've certainly done a little pandering or changing of attitudes. I think Romney has some serious questions, and is very reticent about speaking his mind. Perry is a lot worse than Romney, but he's done a better job of selling himself as an honest man in the campaign and debates than Romney. Cain and Gingrich are the worst of the lot, just outright crooks.

12-12-2011 , 02:53 PM

#13908

champstark

aka starkwired

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 14,838

Frothy is like 95% a closet homosexual, so he can't be at the top of any list.

Bachmann seems pretty straightforward in her craziness, so I'd put her near the top.

I have a hard time believing RP can be such a hardcore creationist and religious man and still be a staunch libertarian. The basic ideas of Christianity conflict with libertarianism (the whole premise of following something written down by someone you've never met just because you are supposed to seems pretty non-libertarian in theory to me).

12-12-2011 , 03:05 PM

#13909

Vecernicek

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 3,781

That Rick Perry pic is like 8 years old. Someone is an expert digger.

12-12-2011 , 03:05 PM

#13910

freedom.fries

old hand

Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 1,730

http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/20...-employees.php

the video from Newt attacking Willard.

12-12-2011 , 03:08 PM

#13911

Vecernicek

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 3,781

If a Democrat said Mitt should give back his money I doubt he'd get credit for a nice comeback.

12-12-2011 , 03:24 PM

#13912

O.A.F.K.1.1

Ted Patrick

Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 27,951

OT, but type; define an english person, into google.

12-12-2011 , 03:25 PM

#13913

suzzer99

Save the Cheerleader, Save the World

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 100,714

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vecernicek

That Rick Perry pic is like 8 years old. Someone is an expert digger.

http://www.archive.org/web/web.php

12-12-2011 , 03:27 PM

#13914

General Tsao

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 30,575

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.A.F.K.1.1

OT, but type; define an english person, into google.

lolz

doesn't work with safe search on fwiw

12-12-2011 , 03:38 PM

#13915

snagglepuss

banned

Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 7,268

if anyone is interested i am laying +140 on the republican party to win the presidency (well above all market prices, and instantly arbable). meaning i want the democrats at -140 :P pm me to gambool

12-12-2011 , 03:39 PM

#13916

snagglepuss

banned

Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 7,268

if anyone is interested i am laying +140 on the republican party to win the presidency (well above all market prices, and instantly arbable). meaning i want the democrats at -140 :P pm me to gambool

12-12-2011 , 03:40 PM

#13917

suzzer99

Save the Cheerleader, Save the World

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 100,714

I suck at sports betting. Does that mean if I bet $100 on the repubs, you get $140 if the dems win?

12-12-2011 , 03:41 PM

#13918

snagglepuss

banned

Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 7,268

it means you can bet 100 on the repubs and when you win, you win 140. thats better odds by a good margin vs intrade or pinnaclesports, the two biggest markets right now

12-12-2011 , 03:43 PM

#13919

General Tsao

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 30,575

so basically you're offering 1.4:1 ?

what's max on your end?

12-12-2011 , 03:45 PM

#13920

snagglepuss

banned

Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 7,268

yep im offering +140. no maximum

12-12-2011 , 03:46 PM

#13921

Meech

old hand

Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 1,749

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ashington

Yeah, did you happen to notice 2010? There's a whole slew of new 'big jokes' in Congress setting policy right now.

Ya, isn't that the filibuster party? Or is it the cockblocker party?

Blows my mind that Newt is leading the polls. No really. Newt ****ing Gingrich? The douchebag's douchebag? The guy who investigated Clinton while cheating on his wife? The only sitting speaker of the house to be santioned and fined for ethics violations? The guy who resigned in disgrace from the house? Somehow he is now qualified to be president? WTF