Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Ron Paul 2012 Containment Thread Ron Paul 2012 Containment Thread

03-03-2012 , 12:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by snagglepuss
fly,

why is his proposed law terrible again?
Are you referring to the law that uses the big federal government to stomp on the states rights of the small government that want to charge tax on gold and silver sales?

Its terrible because it uses the big federal government to stomp on the states rights of the small government. Which for a "libertarian" like Ron Paul who is all about states rights to the point he wants to undermine the functional checks and balances laid out in the constitution to place state rights above constitutional rights of people then that is a really bad thing. One would assume. Butnah?
03-03-2012 , 12:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by snagglepuss
fly,

why is his proposed law terrible again?
I don't see any reason why precious metals should receive more favorable tax treatment than other valuables.

I'm glad you agree that it's unconstitutional. Poor Ron Paul, probably hired somebody else to draft that bill and didn't bother to find out what they had written.
03-03-2012 , 01:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MvdB
So the one year you want the IRS to value everything by dollars and the next by euros??
I don't want anything. I was asking a question.
03-03-2012 , 01:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexM
I don't want anything. I was asking a question.
Why? You know the answer: of course you're not taxed the second year.
03-03-2012 , 01:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
I don't see any reason why precious metals should receive more favorable tax treatment than other valuables.

I'm glad you agree that it's unconstitutional. Poor Ron Paul, probably hired somebody else to draft that bill and didn't bother to find out what they had written.
because gold and silver should be money?

according to wookie, everything is a currency so, "i dont see any reason why us dollars should receive more favorable tax treatment than other currencies". errr...

anyway, here is ron paul:

Quote:
Originally Posted by ron paul
The final step to ensuring competing currencies is to eliminate capital gains and sales taxes on gold and silver coins. Under current federal law, coins are considered collectibles, and are liable for capital gains taxes. Short-term capital gains rates are at income tax levels, up to 35 percent, while long-term capital gains taxes are assessed at the collectibles rate of 28 percent. Furthermore, these taxes actually tax monetary debasement. As the dollar weakens, the nominal dollar value of gold increases. The purchasing power of gold may remain relatively constant, but as the nominal dollar value increases, the federal government considers this an increase in wealth, and taxes accordingly. Thus, the more the dollar is debased, the more capital gains taxes must be paid on holdings of gold and other precious metals.

Just as pernicious are the sales and use taxes which are assessed on gold and silver at the state level in many states. Imagine having to pay sales tax at the bank every time you change a $10 bill for a roll of quarters to do laundry. Inflation is a pernicious tax on the value of money, but even the official numbers, which are massaged downwards, are only on the order of 4 percent per year. Sales taxes in many states can take away 8 percent or more on every single transaction in which consumers wish to convert their Federal Reserve Notes into gold or silver.
you can read the other parts of his floor speech regarding the free competition in currency act - right here - text of floor speech

gold and silver should be allowed to function as money. the 'clearly inhibiting' laws (your words!) that are placed on it that result in the us dollar hegemony should be repealed.

the poor and middle class should have access to a currency that is not being constantly devalued by our government.

you seem awfully scared of a competing currency. why?

so some people would like to use gold and silver or gold and silver backed notes and allow others access to them instead of the usd. what is so bad about this? what is making you freak out so much?

after all, aren't gold and silver in a bubble right now anyway, so you could have some good ol internet LoLz with phill at all of the idiot conspiritards that exchanged their USD for gold and silver notes that are going to lose all their value?

why so scared homie? more work at the local bank branch for you?
03-03-2012 , 01:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Low Key
When, for suzzer, does the support stop? When does enough become enough?

I certainly understand that no president will have zero blood on his hands if he's in office long enough (or she), bit when do all tr horrible things Obama has done become too much for you to accept? Or do they ever because you feel the other side would always be worse?
I don't have a problem with Libya. I don't have a problem with Al Alwaki. I wish Gitmo was closed but I recognize the political reality that that just wasn't going to happen right now. I am glad we're not sending anyone new there.

I really really hate that the Haditha guys got off scot-free. But I don't know if that's Obama's fault.

The NDAA troubles me. But I've heard plenty of other scary things coming out of govt that didn't materialize into anything.

I'm not thrilled about the medical MJ closings, but so far they seem to be coming only in cities that want to get rid of them anyway and are using the Justice Dept to do their dirty work.

I am definitely troubled by some of the stuff I've read about drone strikes at funerals etc. But at the same time I remember when Obama took office there was a lot of talk about how unstable that whole area of Afghanistan/Pakistan is and how much the Taliban had taken root in Pakistan. Maybe by keeping the fight to them we're keeping a possible de-stablization of Pakistan from occurring.

I believe blowback occurs in stuff like us arming OBL in the first place. But I don't hold much water in the theory that we're creating a bunch of new terrorists every second over there. The people who hate our guts already hate our guts. And there are certain groups that only understand getting hit in the mouth, and nothing else (IE - appeasement alone will never work). If blowback was 100% real the Japanese should be suicide bombing us to this day. I tend to think blowback is overrated when you're already at war with someone.

I don't know. What I do know is we only have like 5% of the whole story, just by the necessity of international diplomacy and war strategy. For the same reason while I was deeply troubled about Bush invading Iraq, I didn't really feel like I had enough info. to fully condemn it until history was written that there were no WMDs and we got into a gigantic quagmire.

Would it shock me if when all the history is written that the drone strikes go down as a massive abuse and failure? No. Would it shock me if this gets looked back on as the moment we turned the tide on Islamic fundamentalism and, once the Arab spring settles down, ushered in a new era of relative peace in that region? No. But I do think that arm-chair QB assessments right now based on some hyperbolic Greenwald rants are likely to not stand the test of history.

I'm not really stating my point very well. But basically I tend to take the longer view on anything where we have such incomplete information as what the hell we're actually doing over there and why. I even gave GWB the benefit of the doubt for a while, until one by one his decisions turned to crapola. Obama has made pretty good decisions imo on the stuff that either is more immediately apparent or where the results come a lot quicker than international relations and the war on terror.

So in summation. Some stuff is troubling. But not nearly enough to overcome all the stuff about RP or the republicans that I'm deeply troubled about. I know many of you don't agree with me but at least I hope you give me some credit for throwing all my ideas out there for scrutiny and attack, unlike many of the people who constantly attack me with nothing but snark and open-ended vague questions. Or the whole brown-baby killer thing.

Last edited by suzzer99; 03-03-2012 at 01:39 PM.
03-03-2012 , 01:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MvdB
Why? You know the answer: of course you're not taxed the second year.
Why not? I've realized gains.

And yes, I knew the answer, but I didn't know if you knew, and it's important to establish that before we move on.
03-03-2012 , 01:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by snagglepuss
because gold and silver should be money?

according to wookie, everything is a currency so, "i dont see any reason why us dollars should receive more favorable tax treatment than other currencies". errr...
So gold and silver aren't money right now? Ben Bernake was right!


Quote:
gold and silver should be allowed to function as money. the 'clearly inhibiting' laws (your words!) that are placed on it that result in the us dollar hegemony should be repealed.
Gold and silver, but not diamonds? Salt? Soap? Chickens?

Why is Ron Paul afraid of poultry-backed currency? He probably knows that gold and silver are in a bubble, but delicious chickenbucks have an intrinsic nutritional value.

Quote:
so some people would like to use gold and silver or gold and silver backed notes and allow others access to them instead of the usd. what is so bad about this? what is making you freak out so much?
I'm not freaking out, I'm being kind enough to educate you. Remember like yesterday? When you didn't know what art 1 section 10 was? Now you do! Learning! Yay.

Anyway, you never did take a stab at my Somalia question. People who live under actual anarchy, with no government of any sort, prefer to transact in USD. Why don't they use gold?

Quote:
after all, aren't gold and silver in a bubble right now anyway, so you could have some good ol internet LoLz with phill at all of the idiot conspiritards that exchanged their USD for gold and silver notes that are going to lose all their value?

why so scared homie? more work at the local bank branch for you?
Uh, again, we do currently have competing currencies. USD has won that competition, both within the US and in many places internationally. So I disagree with the premise of your question.
03-03-2012 , 01:45 PM
yikes :/....im really surprised you are not wildly successful in finance or business

best of luck

but for your first obtuse thoughts on why gold and silver and not salt, soap, chickens or diamonds, here is ron paul, again, from the same floor speech linked above

Quote:
Originally Posted by ron paul
Mr. Speaker, I rise to introduce the Free Competition in Currency Act. Currency, or money, is what allows civilization to flourish. In the absence of money, barter is the name of the game; if the farmer needs shoes, he must trade his eggs and milk to the cobbler and hope that the cobbler needs eggs and milk. Money makes the transaction process far easier. Rather than having to search for someone with reciprocal wants, the farmer can exchange his milk and eggs for an agreed-upon medium of exchange with which he can then purchase shoes.

This medium of exchange should satisfy certain properties: it should be durable, that is to say, it does not wear out easily; it should be portable, that is, easily carried; it should be divisible into units usable for everyday transactions; it should be recognizable and uniform, so that one unit of money has the same properties as every other unit; it should be scarce, in the economic sense, so that the extant supply does not satisfy the wants of everyone demanding it; it should be stable, so that the value of its purchasing power does not fluctuate wildly; and it should be reproducible, so that enough units of money can be created to satisfy the needs of exchange.

Over millennia of human history, gold and silver have been the two metals that have most often satisfied these conditions, survived the market process, and gained the trust of billions of people. Gold and silver are difficult to counterfeit, a property which ensures they will always be accepted in commerce. It is precisely for this reason that gold and silver are anathema to governments. A supply of gold and silver that is limited in supply by nature cannot be inflated, and thus serves as a check on the growth of government. Without the ability to inflate the currency, governments find themselves constrained in their actions, unable to carry on wars of aggression or to appease their overtaxed citizens with bread and circuses.
again, best of luck with your immense riches and fiat bucks

and you are always a welcome guest to appear on the rootbone political hour, so that offer is still on the table and we will even pay in either USD or silver ounces

Last edited by snagglepuss; 03-03-2012 at 01:51 PM. Reason: more ron paul, dontchaknow
03-03-2012 , 01:52 PM
If gold shouldnt be taxed to allow it to better be used as currency in the states that do tax it then how about my example of earlier in the thread where people may want to use electric goods as a currency - should the sales tax be removed from iPods and flatscreen TVs?

Of course if you dont believe in tax this is an easy question to answer, but in this example please answer from the point of view of a normal person who believes in the constitution and the ability of the state to set sales taxes and so on.
03-03-2012 , 01:53 PM
Gold and silver are so great they need special tax treatment to outcompete salt as a currency?

Even if we grant that Ron Paul's gibberish is all correctish, why doesn't some other country use gold and silver as money? Anywhere in the world? The sales tax of Oklahoma reaches to the Gulf of Aden?
03-03-2012 , 01:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexM
Why not? I've realized gains.

And yes, I knew the answer, but I didn't know if you knew, and it's important to establish that before we move on.
The second year, by holding on to your US dollars, you've only realized a gain measured in euros, not when you measure in US dollars though.
03-03-2012 , 02:05 PM
So not only do we need to stop states from charging sales tax, we also need to stop the IRS from doing calculations in dollars at all? I don't even know how that would work, the IRS asks you what currency you'd like your taxes to be denominated in each year?
03-03-2012 , 02:08 PM
Can we force McDonalds and Wal Mart to take gold and silver? That would probably help the uptake of it as an alternate currency so its worth having the federal government forcing them to do so amirite.
03-03-2012 , 02:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
Gold and silver are so great they need special tax treatment to outcompete salt as a currency?

Even if we grant that Ron Paul's gibberish is all correctish, why doesn't some other country use gold and silver as money? Anywhere in the world? The sales tax of Oklahoma reaches to the Gulf of Aden?
the swiss franc used to be backed by 40% gold up until 2000. it experienced historically low inflation and was regarded as the safe-haven currency of the world.

even in 2005 after a big gold selling program the swiss national bank still had 20% gold reserves

the swiss franc continued to appreciate against the dollar and euro as it retained its safe-haven status.

last year it was pegged by the snb to 1.2 euro, and the franc fell 8.8 against the euro and 9.5% against the usd in 15 minutes

im afraid that a discussion of governments and central banks competitively devaluing their currencies may be beyond the scope of understanding for someone struggling with why gold and silver would be a superior basis or a currency rather than salt or chickens, so i will just leave you with the above info.

if you are really in the mood to read, i suggest looking into why the australian dollar has gained so much value in the last decade. (hint: commodity exports!)

Last edited by snagglepuss; 03-03-2012 at 02:14 PM.
03-03-2012 , 02:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexM
Are you missing my point here? We could go into detail trying to figure out exactly how much is taxed when, but it just doesn't matter. There is only one currency that I am never ever taxed for owning. That by itself is granting an effective monopoly to that currency.
And we're back to the "inhibition = prohibition" argument. That's false, btw.
03-03-2012 , 02:15 PM
We're also back to the "inflation is de facto bad" argument too.

The more things change the more they stay the same.

The reason why central banks dont use the gold standard anymore is demonstrated nicely in the Eurozone right now as countries feel the squeeze and cant quantative ease like Britain and America (and other of course) to stimulate activity. The market and the economists have spoken, gold as a currency is just flat out wrong. Fiat is superior.
03-03-2012 , 02:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzzer99
I wish Gitmo was closed but I recognize the political reality that that just wasn't going to happen right now. I am glad we're not sending anyone new there.
You realize Bush stopped sending new prisoners there a couple of years before Obama was elected, right? Because you're phrasing this in a way that implies that Obama should get credit for this.
03-03-2012 , 02:25 PM
What about Time Based Money, or Ithaca Hours currency? These are legal and functioning alternate currencies in use today. And they don't suffer from the LOLtardency of using precious metals. What would L.Ron think, and what do the Ronulans think, about these real world alternatives?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wikipedia
In economics, a time-based currency is an alternative currency where the unit of exchange is the man-hour.

Some time-based currencies value everyone’s contributions equally. One hour equals one service credit. In these systems, one person volunteers to work for an hour for another person; thus, they are credited with one hour, which they can redeem for an hour of service from another volunteer. Critics charge this would lead to fewer doctors or dentists. Other systems, such as Ithaca Hours, let doctors and dentists charge more hours per hour.

Time Dollars are created via mutual credit: Each transaction is recorded as a corresponding credit and debit in the accounts of the participants. In a Time Dollars system, or Time Bank, each participant's time is valued equally, whether he/she is a novice or an extensively trained expert. Time Dollars thus recognize and encourage reciprocal community service, resist inflation without encouraging hoarding, and are in sufficient supply, which enables trade and cooperation among participants. It has been implemented in a wide variety of settings – rural Appalachia, urban St. Louis, in Youth Court, and in retirement communities, to name a few...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wikipedia
The Ithaca HOUR is a local currency used in Ithaca, New York and is the oldest and largest local currency system in the United States that is still operating. It has inspired other similar systems in Madison, Wisconsin; Corvallis, Oregon; and a proposed system in the Lehigh Valley, Pennsylvania. One Ithaca HOUR is valued at US$10 and is generally recommended to be used as payment for one hour's work, although the rate is negotiable...
03-03-2012 , 02:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
And we're back to the "inhibition = prohibition" argument. That's false, btw.
Just like no one is prohibited from making an OS to compete with Windows. Anyone can do it, so obviously they can never have a monopoly.

Anyway, I never said anything to indicate that I think "inhibition = prohibition". Clearly, it's not the same. Inhibition is a much subtler way of making what you want to happen happen without being obviously tyrannical. Way superior from a political stance.
03-03-2012 , 02:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MvdB
The second year, by holding on to your US dollars, you've only realized a gain measured in euros, not when you measure in US dollars though.
What does that matter? I've realized a gain.
03-03-2012 , 02:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by snagglepuss
the swiss franc used to be backed by 40% gold up until 2000. it experienced historically low inflation and was regarded as the safe-haven currency of the world.
Which is why by 1998 it surged to 0.3% of official Forex Reserves. That's only a little lower than the 69.3% of reserves that were worthless USD fiat bucks!

Quote:
even in 2005 after a big gold selling program the swiss national bank still had 20% gold reserves

the swiss franc continued to appreciate against the dollar and euro as it retained its safe-haven status.
Whoops! Next time you're poorly paraphrasing Wikipedia you should probably just not include this sentence because it seems to wildly contradict your point.

Quote:
if you are really in the mood to read, i suggest looking into why the australian dollar has gained so much value in the last decade. (hint: commodity exports!)
So you have no idea why people in other countries prefer USD? Maybe they haven't watched enough Youtube videos.
03-03-2012 , 02:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by snagglepuss
the swiss franc used to be backed by 40% gold up until 2000. it experienced historically low inflation and was regarded as the safe-haven currency of the world.

even in 2005 after a big gold selling program the swiss national bank still had 20% gold reserves

the swiss franc continued to appreciate against the dollar and euro as it retained its safe-haven status.

last year it was pegged by the snb to 1.2 euro, and the franc fell 8.8 against the euro and 9.5% against the usd in 15 minutes

im afraid that a discussion of governments and central banks competitively devaluing their currencies may be beyond the scope of understanding for someone struggling with why gold and silver would be a superior basis or a currency rather than salt or chickens, so i will just leave you with the above info.

if you are really in the mood to read, i suggest looking into why the australian dollar has gained so much value in the last decade. (hint: commodity exports!)
What is the economic argument that a strong currency is good? Switzerland decided to peg its currency to the Euro because "The current massive overvaluation of the Swiss franc poses an acute threat to the Swiss economy and carries the risk of a deflationary development,"
If a hard currency is desired there is no reason that to introduce currency competition and the resultant economic inefficiency. A simple change to Fed policy could get the "desired" result.
03-03-2012 , 02:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissileDog
What about Time Based Money
You still have to worry about inflation based on your bank's relative velocity and gravitational field.


Quote:
Originally Posted by snagglepuss
the swiss franc [...] was regarded as the safe-haven currency of the world.
Wat?
03-03-2012 , 02:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexM
What does that matter? I've realized a gain.
The IRS has elected to operate in one currency and to measure gains in one currency. You have not realized a gain measured in US dollars, as you have not increased your amount of US dollars. This isn't hard. Your "OMG I'm not taxed if I hold USD" is pretty hollow, because it's trivial that the USD will never appreciate the USD. Like, you're not taxed on your Euros if they don't appreciate against the USD either. You're not taxed on your stocks, gold, salt, or oil if they don't appreciate against the USD.

      
m