Quote:
Originally Posted by Brocktoon
I doubt it's important to him one way or the other, but he is probably well aware of the fact that a $300k family income does not allow one to live a lifestyle that would meet any reasonable definition of "rich". Why does that seem to bother you so much?
It doesn't really bother me, like I've said from the start, everyone is certainly free to hold whatever bizarre personal subjective definition of rich they want.
That's
my side, though. The "it's not important" side is not the one you're on.
Your side is that there are "reasonable definitions" and, by implication, "unreasonable" ones.
It's like someone strenuously arguing that a 6'8" man shouldn't be described as tall because he'd be terribly undersized to play center in the NBA. Like, sure, OK, I guess by that standard you're not wrong, per se. People certainly called Dennis Rodman undersized for his whole career.
But it'd be
weird if you met Dennis Rodman, asked him to get something off the top shelf because he was tall, and he refused and acted all hurt because Yao Ming is 7 inches taller than him.
"You short people don't know what it's like to battle for rebounds with guys 4-5 inches taller than me every game! If you aren't at least 6'5" you probably shouldn't even talk about the definition of tall"