PROTIP: When somebody asks for a citation, they mean a citation for the previous statements, not just semirandom new statements with citations.

Srsly, what in the **** is wrong with your brain that you thought your post was even remotely meeting the criteria?

Trump Weighs Mobilizing Nat Guard for Immigration Roundups

Rut row.

The denial seems to be of the form "we're not actually doing that right now". Nobody is denying the authenticity of the sourced memo.

Meanwhile, there are rumors of movers and shakers in MX considering encouraging and supporting their fellow citizens who are caught up in this madness to insist on all their deportation due process, which would bring the entire system to it's knees.

I'm still surprised a large scale eurotourist consumer side boycott hasn't been organized yet. The travel industry is already hurting.

And, in news that is almost nonexistent in the English language press, activists on the MX side of San Diego-Tijuana have been routinely blockading the busiest land border in the world. They've shut it down almost every weekend since December. So far, this is a reaction to internal MX concerns. However, there is no reason this couldn't come to include the reaction to MAGAism, and be extended across the entire border. That would cripple the entire US economy.

How do I report 5ive for breaking the rules and making a personal attack?

Start a thread in ATF.

Sorry what's ATF?

Dunno, seemed a pretty valid question. I just think 5ive is looking out for you

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/55/about-forums/

lol this ****ing dude here accuses liberals of committing terrorism, but now wants to run and cry to the moderator because someone said something mean to him

Continuing on a case-by-case basis seems fine to me. Nobody's managed to seriously AIDS up the thread yet imo.

I'll defer to the OP. Carry on.

It's not my thread. Feel free to advocate for your preferred version.

This is just curiosity, not a criticism, but is like following informal rules here and recognizing zikzak's limited leadership here a part of the RWA way?

Imma put a hard block on any attempts to assign me a leadership role.

That's a good question.

My original snap answer was "no". But after I gave it a little thought, I feel the answer is "yes, in general". Consensus Process is part of the RWA way, although not unique or exclusive to RWA. Informal rules definitely are a part of Consensus Process.

In this case, the above isn't relevant. I just have always felt that the OP, who creates the topic of the thread, should be given wide deference in determining what is on- or off-topic in that thread.

All of his links were from right wing tabloids. Wonder why!

Would you like a safe space snowflake?

I've always been more partial to this OOT thread rule:

"You are not the boss of your thread. Making an OP doesn't give you the ability to dictate how that thread turns out."

Re: thread rules.

My feeling is more like zikzak's. And I'm kind of fond of limited digressions anyway.

But this is interesting imo. Shame, you did choose to be a RWA. So if their way is similar to your way it may be that you just match up well with the culture more than were influenced by it.

Intelectually like all the local control and small groups meeting, negotiating and voting on things in social anarchy sounds sweet, but in practice I hate participating in things like that and am much more inclined towards something closer to the colloquial use of "anarchy" and everyone just doing whatever the hell they feel like doing.

So citing a British tabloid counts as a cite these days?

Didn't realize fake news was now accepted as proof of a claim.

Kindly stop derailing the thread, plz and thnx.

Also, your abject stupidity is pretty much a personal attack against everybody posting in and reading this thread, so if you find out how to report people let me know.

It revealed his claim and as clownish as we all knew it to be. At least he offered something.

Definitely. Most at some point reject hierarchy, then search for non-hierachical organization.

Patience in spades is most certainly a virtue.

After a while, as a practical matter, you can skip most of the meetings. Once established, the plenary popular assembly will mandate and delegate committees to get shiz done. If you just wanna do some of that shiz you only really need to go to that committee's meetings. These meetings, being much smaller, and being more focussed, will usually run much smoother.

so as long as someone who was posting conspiracy theory garbage linked to infowars it'd be cool?

It'd pass "cite or ban" muster, but there is more than one rule in this forum.

PM LordJVK