I had a 12 diet coke a day habit for a long time.

So tonight, the President of the United States suggested that a woman who has been drinking cannot be sexually assaulted. That was interesting.

my neighborhood had 0 Clinton signs and maybe 15 trump signs last election. there are two signs for democrats and none for republicans this election.

I overlooked the not-so-obvious projection in that last tweet.

"Behind the scenes the Dems are laughing."

Hmmm, what happened recently that made him think of people laughing at other people? I'm not the laughter. YOU'RE the laughter.

nice

That is why trump never drinks himself.

( twitter | raw text )

( twitter | raw text )

How them wages doing?

Like, what kind of odds do you need to take YES here?

It will never cease to amaze me. Sooooo many Tragic Death Dems loathe milquetoast empty suits like Chuck and Nancy and DEMAND that the Dems stop wearing boxing gloves to backyard bareknuckle fights. Then someone finally comes along who has, at the very least, demonstrated a willingness and an ability to fight the other side using the same rules/tools as they...AND THEY HATE THAT GUY TOO!

It's merely a working hypothesis atm but I'm starting to strongly suspect that some people are going to ***** and moan no matter what.

Yeah I've gotten in trouble before trying to use yard sign count as a measuring stick, but I still find it very uplifting that in my little town of Redneckville, FL I have seen several Nelson, Gillum and Soderberg signs, but not a single one for Rick Scott or Ron Desantis or Michael Waltz (and this is Desantis' district).

Yard signs are a great gauge. I was travelling the country in the summer of 2016. Saw thousands of Trump signs and maybe 20 Clinton signs.

This. This. This.

If you think Dems are weak and suck at changing the public narrative, yet you don't quite like Avanatti - **** off.

I mean I can understand wanting your Gladiator to be someone who isn't Saul Goodman or someone whose eyes are farther apart or whatever, but we don't always get the hero we want. But if you really, truly think he and his ilk are doing more harm than good for the cause...what exactly are you after? What is your end game? If you really want someone who fights them by their own (lack of) rules, you don't want him to go away, not if you want the Dems to stop being the GOP's doormat, you want him on that wall you need him on that wall and you need more to join him on that wall. And they aren't gonna climb that wall if their reward (from their own party!) for doing so is having their heads chopped off.

You can have your so called principles or you can have political power and use it. Can’t have both. That sucks; deal with it.

I agree with all of that.

It still doesn't make sense that he made his twitter page private. His individual actions are above discussion now?

I mean, discuss it if you want, but I’m certainly not wasting a single brain cell on Michael Avenattis twitter account settings.

This is why the right wins. Does a single ****ing person on the right spend any time discussing what an irredeemable piece of **** Sean Hannity is? Rush Limbaugh?

You’re doing this weird ass NYT thing where you PRE EMPTIVELY try to rebut bad faith bull**** nonsense from the right. It’s conceding before the game even starts.

Clearly not his hands!



Two things I can't imagine Trump wearing - a silver wedding ring or a lanyard. ALso note normal sized hands.

Seems that Trump keeps a designated coke pourer in his retinue. Does anyone have a picture of this guy's face? I am imagining a young Louie Anderson or maybe Frish's Big Boy.

To your point, the right just echoes what their talking heads tell them and accepts it as face value. That is why the right wins. I wasn't doing that, you're correct.

The answer is, of course, no, but I diverge a bit from this line of thinking. If we are better then we have to actually BE better, otherwise we're just winning for the sake of winning.

It's like Rudy in The Rainmaker: "Every client I ever have will expect the same magic, nothing less. And I could probably give it to them, if it didn't matter how I did it. And then I'd wake up one morning and find that I'd become Leo Drummond."

There's a fine line between fighting on their terms and becoming Hannity/Rush. (And I mean, let's face it, we have our Hannitys and Rushes already anyway.) If it turns out Avenatti is an actual piece of ****, he should be treated as such, but he shouldn't be prejudged as such based on what we've seen so far. We've developed such a taste for milquetoast that anything spicy gives us crippling indigestion.

https://twitter.com/indivis_Nville/s...60813618876417

These mother****ers couldn't find their *******s with both hands and a flashlight.

Bill Mitchell created a fake tweet to make it look like Avenatti threatened to destroy 4chan. My guess is Avenatti made it private b/c he can't monitor his account 24/7. Enough people follow him that he can control his messaging w/o worrying about trolls hacking him.