Quote:
Wow.
I'll try again, slower this time, cause you don't seem like the brightest mod of the bunch -
'Catching al capone for tax evasion' isn't an example we should aspire to. It's not a symbol of a great judicial system or a just society. That doesn't mean it was better for Al Capone to stay out of jail or that it's better if Mueller doesn't investigate 'russiagate'.
I can try in several other languages, if you think it might help you out. I can do finger painting too.
The point you seem to be making is neither relevant nor important.
Maybe you don't realize that Russia has been the enemy (in a real sense) of the United States for over 70 years. Couple that with the importance of elections in a democracy.
Elections, kinda important, wouldn't you say? And presidential elections are the daddy of all elections in the United States. I cannot believe these things need to be spelled out, but here we are.
People have different views on where Trump and his team likely fall on the spectrum of:
- there was no Russian meddling/interference
- unwittingly benefiting from Russian meddling/interference
- wittingly benefiting from Russian meddling/interference
- colluding with Russian operatives to influence the election.
The parallel with Nixon and Watergate is somewhat apropos. Many sensible people hated Nixon's policies and what he was doing to the country. But there was nothing blatantly illegal about those policies. So when the opportunity presented itself, Nixon was driven from office due to his behavior surrounding Watergate. It's not that anybody really cared about a second-rate burglary. It's what it revealed about Nixon and certainly involved illegal activities advocated and condoned by the president himself.
To circle back to Trump and Russia. Many people already believe that Trump is a dishonorable sleazebag with abhorrent political views who would likely do anything to get his way (including on his way to becoming president).
The fact that there now appears to be "smoke" in the Russia meddling/interference case suggests that Trump or his team may have committed illegal acts in this important arena (as spelled out above).
So let's agree to stop comparing Trump-Russia to Capone-tax evasion. Again, and I can't believe this needs to be pointed out, if Trump really is guilty of the behavior at the most egregious end of the spectrum referred to above, he would have engaged in what would be considered among the most heinous acts an American presidential candidate could ever do.
Personally, I think members of his team probably fall somewhere in the middle of the Trump-Russia spectrum. But that doesn't mean that we shouldn't vigorously investigate all the possibilities.
Indeed, akin to Nixon and Watergate, vigorously pursuing the Trump-Russia investigation may turn out to be a fruitful means to minimize the impact a Trump presidency may ultimately have on a wide swath of important issues of the day.