Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns. The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: No smocking guns.

01-25-2018 , 11:45 PM
Lol the Conservative hot take is he didn't fire him so what's the big deal?
01-25-2018 , 11:47 PM
Breitbart


Last edited by markksman; 01-25-2018 at 11:51 PM. Reason: Lol Matty already posted this
01-25-2018 , 11:52 PM
So where does this lead now?

Mueller wants to interview Trump. Trump cannot give an interview... It only leads to: incriminating himself, lying to the fbi - incriminating himself that way, or pleading the fifth - perhaps the ONLY thing that could pierce the right wing bubble.

But we now know what lengths he's willing to go to... We all suspected it already.

So, he'll just refuse the interview, right? If Mueller subpoenas him, he'll still refuse. They'll claim some absurdly expansive executive privilege - they've already trial ballooned that strategy.

It'll end up before SCOTUS...

It's like Trump's only play at this point, right?
01-25-2018 , 11:52 PM
If Trump actually testifies in front of Mueller, there is a decent chance we'll see a "You can't handle the truth" situation and he gets hauled off in handcuffs
01-25-2018 , 11:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dominic
If Trump actually testifies in front of Mueller, there is a decent chance we'll see a "You can't handle the truth" situation and he gets hauled off in handcuffs
Please let it be live on TV.
01-25-2018 , 11:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuserounder
So where does this lead now?

Mueller wants to interview Trump. Trump cannot give an interview... It only leads to: incriminating himself, lying to the fbi - incriminating himself that way, or pleading the fifth - perhaps the ONLY thing that could pierce the right wing bubble.

But we now know what lengths he's willing to go to... We all suspected it already.

So, he'll just refuse the interview, right? If Mueller subpoenas him, he'll still refuse. They'll claim some absurdly expansive executive privilege - they've already trial ballooned that strategy.

It'll end up before SCOTUS...

It's like Trump's only play at this point, right?
The latest episode of the Slow Burn podcast (highly recommended!) feels a little relevant here: it describes the point at which Nixon was being forced to turn over his tapes, and all the absurd shenannigans his team came up with to avoid doing that, including the release of inaccurate transcripts made by a guy with hearing loss!

Point is, I expect Ty Cobb to basically throw the kitchen sink at this and throw every legal objection he can imagine at keeping Trump from speaking to Muller, even if that means making up fantastical new interpretations of executive privilege.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cuserounder
Please let it be live on TV.
Zero chance they televise this.
01-26-2018 , 12:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by markksman
Breitbart

wowzers
01-26-2018 , 12:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuserounder
So where does this lead now?

Mueller wants to interview Trump. Trump cannot give an interview... It only leads to: incriminating himself, lying to the fbi - incriminating himself that way, or pleading the fifth - perhaps the ONLY thing that could pierce the right wing bubble.

But we now know what lengths he's willing to go to... We all suspected it already.

So, he'll just refuse the interview, right? If Mueller subpoenas him, he'll still refuse. They'll claim some absurdly expansive executive privilege - they've already trial ballooned that strategy.

It'll end up before SCOTUS...

It's like Trump's only play at this point, right?
I mean, if he gets subpoena'd before a grand jury... he's testifying. Clinton v. Jones was unanimously decided against Clinton (and that includes current Justices Kennedy and Thomas), and that was a civil case. If a president can't dodge a civil deposition by claiming executive privilege he can't freaking dodge a grand jury subpoena. This isn't goin gto be some 5-4 close Supreme Court case. It'll be unanimous against him.
01-26-2018 , 12:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dominic
If Trump actually testifies in front of Mueller, there is a decent chance we'll see a "You can't handle the truth" situation and he gets hauled off in handcuffs
This is an interview, not a cross-examination. Trump will walk out of it thinking he did great. Then he'll get charged with lying to the FBI on top of everything else.
01-26-2018 , 12:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
The latest episode of the Slow Burn podcast (highly recommended!) feels a little relevant here: it describes the point at which Nixon was being forced to turn over his tapes, and all the absurd shenannigans his team came up with to avoid doing that, including the release of inaccurate transcripts made by a guy with hearing loss!

Point is, I expect Ty Cobb to basically throw the kitchen sink at this and throw every legal objection he can imagine at keeping Trump from speaking to Muller, even if that means making up fantastical new interpretations of executive privilege.
Sounds about right... It can buy him time, if nothing else.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
Zero chance they televise this.
I know.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jman220
I mean, if he gets subpoena'd before a grand jury... he's testifying. Clinton v. Jones was unanimously decided against Clinton (and that includes current Justices Kennedy and Thomas), and that was a civil case. If a president can't dodge a civil deposition by claiming executive privilege he can't freaking dodge a grand jury subpoena. This isn't goin gto be some 5-4 close Supreme Court case. It'll be unanimous against him.
I agree, but then what happens if Trump says, "Cool ruling, I'm still not going."

We then have a constitutional crisis, and it's pretty much up to the GOP in Congress, is it not?
01-26-2018 , 12:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
\!

Point is, I expect Ty Cobb to basically throw the kitchen sink at this and throw every legal objection he can imagine at keeping Trump from speaking to Muller, even if that means making up fantastical new interpretations of executive privilege.
I would expect him to try to slide into Mueller spikes up.
01-26-2018 , 12:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jman220
I mean, if he gets subpoena'd before a grand jury... he's testifying. Clinton v. Jones was unanimously decided against Clinton (and that includes current Justices Kennedy and Thomas), and that was a civil case. If a president can't dodge a civil deposition by claiming executive privilege he can't freaking dodge a grand jury subpoena. This isn't goin gto be some 5-4 close Supreme Court case. It'll be unanimous against him.


That’s back when rules mattered.
01-26-2018 , 12:07 AM
Republicans just gave billionaires and corporations a gigantic tax cut, ballooned the deficit by $1.5T *and* gutted Obamacare - w/o one Democrat vote. Please explain to me why the **** they need Democrat to compromise for freaking $25B for a wall?
01-26-2018 , 12:08 AM
Is anyone seeing the specific date in June for when Trump tried to fire Mueller?
01-26-2018 , 12:10 AM
The founders were geniuses so I'm assuming that there is a section of the constitution that allows the country to load previous save slots and replay this whole thing.
01-26-2018 , 12:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by uDevil
Is anyone seeing the specific date in June for when Trump tried to fire Mueller?
No, my guess is that the leakers didn't want that out there because they don't want the public to know what it was in reaction to... That would indicate a weak spot he's worried about.
01-26-2018 , 12:12 AM
I'm not denying white privilege has a lot to do with it. I am saying Trump is more shameless and better than other rich white scions at using his white privilege to enrich himself and stay out of jail at the expense of everyone around him.
01-26-2018 , 12:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuserounder
So where does this lead now?
"Mueller is biased against me because I tried to fire him. He should recuse himself."
01-26-2018 , 12:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul D
I would expect him to try to slide into Mueller spikes up.
That's not even a dirty move by Ty Cobb standards. Mother****er was one of the grimiest baseball players ever:

Quote:
As Smithsonian magazine stated, "Violent confrontations were a recurring theme in Cobb's life."[15] He is thought to have committed several violent assaults during his playing time. Reported victims of his sudden uncontrollable rages through the years included a black groundskeeper who attempted to shake Cobb's hand, along with his wife, though this story (see above) is now considered dubious at best; as well as a handicapped fan. As he attacked the handicapped man, "someone screamed for Cobb to stop, pointing out that the man had no hands. 'I don't care if he has no feet!' Cobb yelled back, stomping [the handicapped man] until park police pulled him off."[15] Cobb reported in his autobiography that the handicapped man incurred Cobb's ire by speaking on his mother's "color and morals".
01-26-2018 , 12:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hold'em 07
The founders were geniuses so I'm assuming that there is a section of the constitution that allows the country to load previous save slots and replay this whole thing.
were they stable geniuses though? didnt think so

SAD!
01-26-2018 , 12:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by uDevil
Is anyone seeing the specific date in June for when Trump tried to fire Mueller?
Pretty sure it was Saturday June 17th. I remember because Red Robin was having a special on something burgers.
01-26-2018 , 12:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by eyebooger
"Mueller is biased against me because I tried to fire him. He should recuse himself."
Sounds right.

The Mexican judge is biased against me because he knows I hate Mexicans. He should recuse himself.
01-26-2018 , 12:19 AM
01-26-2018 , 12:22 AM
It's a long shot, but Hannity somehow being involved in this criminally would make me so happy.
01-26-2018 , 12:23 AM
So, is it still unclear whether or not Mueller can bring charges against Trump? The consensus I seem to gather from talking heads is that it's debatable and so it's more likely Mueller would recommend impeachment instead. Is that right?

Also, are we expecting Mueller to release some kind of report at the end of this detailing what they found out? Or is he strictly limited to bringing criminal cases against individuals?

Would be grateful if any lawyers ITT wanted to shed some light on this.

      
m