Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
6ix and bob have a point there but in the real world tutoring for the SAT/ACT are nearly standard for those who can afford it. Also, standards being lower at bad public schools means super smart kids will still do worse on the SATs, but can get good grades. They may have to catch up in college, but the top x% at a lower performing school is still just as intelligent as that percent at most better performing schools (magnets, acadamies that select kids based on tests and academics could be different, but most higher performing schools select more by zip code). Imagine what it takes to get a top score on the SAT when almost no one you know has, your school barely offers classes that get you far enough, and you barely even know about the test prep centers let alone have money for them.
Otoh, the answer for smart kids with bad educations is probably a couple years in community college and not being put in classes that they aren't ready for. But then they can't take the SAT at that point?
Quote:
Originally Posted by microbet
I think the rich kid with the bad SAT at the top school is more of a theoretical worry and the poor brilliant kid who got a 1260 on the SAT, the best in their HS, is a common occurence.
This feels like a myth but I don't feel super-confident saying so.
I attended Morgan Park HS:
https://www.usnews.com/education/bes...gh-school-6578
https://www.illinoisreportcard.com/s...50162990250031
I had peers who went on to UofChicago, Duke, Vanderbilt, STEM at UofIllinois, etc. The general consensus was they had to crush the ACT/SAT and the admissions essays because the GPA from a middle-of-the-road all-black HS on the South Side of Chicago didn't mean a ****ing thing. That's also why that generation gets so upset about the misunderstandings and myths surrounding affirmative action.