You're defending a system where police unions cozy up to local governments which allows them to create rules that allow them to get away with murder.

Lol, try again.

lol, nailed it. Hey though, you can always keep lying about what I said about expelling suspected rapists from school. I'm sure you can get goofy to give ya a quick tug at least.

In the meantime, the system that created these rules that cops benefit from will stand. You'll complain about civil rights and how racism is so bad, but you won't actually offer up a proposal that can bring immediate real change. Some real hot takes will be thrown at obvious racists though, and you can feel superior for a while knowing that you're less racist than that guy. #CHANGEWECANBELIEVEIN

The problem with that is, not many people here can speak credibly about race.

Do you know cops vote?

Lol. How about we start with what got started in Ferguson, and what has produced results in Los Angeles. How about we continue to laugh at your assertion that busting unions is a panacea, and how you want us to believe that it comes from anywhere but a desire to score cheap points for a pet cause only tangentially related to this issue.

Why do they believe people like me and not people like you? Is it just that I know how to use punctuation?

Tangentially related

How cops get away with abuse is tangentially related to abuse guys!

I think we're all still waiting to hear how the unions do that. Are judges and DAs in the union? Are juries? Hell, cops killing blacks can't even make it to a jury, so maybe it's grand juries that are dues paying members.

Are you?

You just prejudged black people as being incapable of thinking for themselves, so there's that.

Why do people drink soda instead of water? Marxism sounds good to a lot of people when they first hear it.

No, I prejudge most people for that when they react irrationally, skin color have nothing to do with it (that's not really prejudging). Nice try though. I did not even say most of the black people subscribed to this bull****, I just said it was fed to them. I would bet the rioters were a small minority of the population of the city of Baltimore. I was judging the rioters based on the context of the question" why did they riot?" I caught you being disingenuous yet again.

Oh and wookie, you want to talk about the LAPD? Guess what happened there?

The feds came in and forced them to rework their disciplinary procedures (amongst a whole bunch of other things). Why can't we setup standards like that for everyone?

I'm not making the mistake of thinking you're asking an honest question, but just in case someone else is reading:

People drink soda instead of water because it tastes better than water.

I don't follow the Marxism comment. Nothing you're saying has anything to do with Marxism.

Let me write very simply.

According to you, the police do not mistreat blacks, and blacks are in fact not the victim of racism. When you tell them this, which should be consistent with their personal lives, they don't believe you. When I tell them otherwise, which is NOT what they've actually experienced, they believe me?

So try again. Why do they believe me over not just their own eyes, but also you, a man who seems to believe he is intelligent and well informed?

You have no idea that your ideology falls exactly in line with Marxism.



When you deliberately choose to distort my words to fit into your twisted little narrative its kind of pointless to continue.

Consider for a moment the other alternative. That they are angry for a reason, not because of outside ****ing agitators you have to be ****ing ****ting me.

I guess we're going to have to add Marxism to the ever-growing list of words that braves doesn't understand.

braves I'm assuming you're about 17 so let me pull you aside and clue you in to something real important. Nobody gives a **** about your opinions that you've noodled up sitting in your parent's house. Fairy tales you tell yourself about how the cops and good and cool and #actually racism is a liberal hoax might seem groundbreaking to you, but are actually old hat on the internet.

Read a ****ing book or two. Learn something about the world(for example, Jim Crow ended in the 60s, not the 50s). Learn to write like an educated adult. Then and only then will your beliefs get the respect you appear to believe they deserve.

Oh wow someone who has definite opinions on the souls of black people and don't know what Marxism is, I was caught unawares by this sudden surprise.

Lol ikes. Never once have I said I approved of the disciplinary status quo, or that the changes that occurred in LA didn't include or should not have included changes in disciplinary policy. Keep on lying, though.

That makes a lot more sense than rioting over a relatively small number of deaths. In case you missed it, not too many people get killed by cops relative to the population, not even black people and even more unlikely you will be killed if you are not engaged in criminal activity. If I understand you correctly, they are angry about stuff that is not happening to them personally but to a small number of people who share their same skin color?

They aren't just rioting over the people who got killed. And not all of the people who got killed were involved in criminal activity.

http://www.buzzfeed.com/adamserwer/b...ldqpgc#4ldqpgc

Well, when you can paraphrase my words honestly, I'd be sure to take what you have to say under advisement but that probably wont happen, so, you can pretty much go on calling me a racist and pushing your cognitive dissonance upon others, I could give a damn. I do not have to distort your words. You have to distort mine. Look in the mirror kid.