I'm unaware of this #tcot chain letter scandal, please elaborate in between your BLM marches and Pride parties.


You mean "acid washed", right?

They've explained that they used a keyword search method to find all work-related emails. But lol Danny, man, look at how you're phrasing these questions. There's a Bernie voter way of attacking Clinton over the emails(Trolly's posts in this forum, that you definitely already read, would be an example) and then there's the Hannity listener, Trump voter way you're doing it.

Huh so weird that last question takes a hard turn to being against OBAMA. I thought super progressive Danny here was just motivated out of left wing principle to hate HRC and her supporters, but in an UNBELIEVABLE SURPRISE it turns out he has some resentment about that first black President.

One thing this election may do: elevate Ohio to Florida levels of derision. And deservedly so. **** Ohio.

Cheerleaders Display "Trail Of Tears" Banner Before Game Against Team With Indian Mascot

Are you under the impression that the US does not regularity meddle in the elections, or other government transitions, of sovereign nations? If so, you are galactically naive. This is common practice, which is why I laugh every time Clinton wants to hit the fainting couch over Russia's attempt to mess with this election.

Uh, duh? She is a moderate neo con. American Foreign Policy since WWII=Force regimes down the throats of peoples inhabiting areas important to our perceived self interest, failing that, conduct covert operations to influence the democratic process of sovereign states, and insure regimes to our liking.

I mean really, I know T supporters aren't exactly supposed to be educated, but aren't some of them vaguely familiar with how we have handled Foreign Policy for the last seventy years?

i mean i have to totally agree here, it's unnecessary and so costly that the system and the candidates will inherently favor big money interests (somebody has to fund all that campaigning)

Trump voters ****ing GIDDY about this nothingburger story totes going to bring down the Obama and Clinton criminal conspiracies are setting themselves up for Math You Do As a Republican 2.0

We aren't fainting over Russia's attempt. We are deeply concerned that the Republican nominee and a huge segment of his political base has embraced and or been tricked by their attempt.

Pretty well versed in the Allende coup, so I can feel pretty content in my knowledge of modern US foreign policy

You would hope he didn't take this step as a pure CYA exercise and at least thought there was potential for a criminal charge to come from this. He might be legally boxed given his testimony to Congress. I do believe he should tell us if this is more of the same or something more serious.

The US strategy in 2006 was terrible. We insisted on elections then immediately applied sanctions because we didn't like the winner.

It's not surprising Hamas won. The incumbents were extremely corrupt and not interested in much else. Hamas did terrorism, humanitarian programs, and offered the possibility of less corruption -- all popular.

Elections and sanctions empowered Hamas and took the peace process from damaged to dead.

Given the elections, I would have preferred to treat Hamas like a government. Let them worry about building. The immediate attack allowed then to escape accountability from their people.

Even you should be above sounding like this big of a 'slappy' when you are Correcting the Record.

Good ol 'nothingburger', a favorite lame phrase used by Hillary apologists

At least try man.

No u?

Then explain why the state department doing what's it's done for decades is a big deal for Clinton?

For the record, the publisher of the story Dan is bringing up re:Palestine is Jarod kushner. Who is ivanka's husband and was the mastermind behind "bring bills accusers to the second debate".

It's not really a big deal for anyone who is a realist. But there is a large progressive segment of the Democratic Party that likes to think that the United States should not meddle in the governing and electoral process of sovereign states, especially in Third World countries, simply out of economic and security self interests. It's a morality thing for them.

Those people are naive at best, but they exist, and this kind of stuff would have been a bigger issue in a Democratic primary than a general election. For Hillary Republicans like me, it actually makes her more attractive as a candidate.

did some Googling on this for you

in March 2005 the Palestinian Cairo Declaration decided among other things there'd be an election in 2006 to determine Palestine's legislature, the last election having been in 1996. The USA supported the 2006 election:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palest...election,_2006
the result of this election was
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...012600372.html
I think Hillary's quote is about the futility of pushing for these elections without having "determined" (accurately forecast) it would be against American interests

Interesting that he was way less interested in YOUR question about what Hillary did wrong but he sure does have a prepackaged JAQing off session queued up and ready to go.

Right down to the typical conspiracy theorist phrasing of asking every question in a leading manner, "what are your thoughts on..." **** **** like that.

In your world, what happened and why to WTC 7?

How do you feel about the Phoenix Memo and the wargames? And so forth.


The goal of that is, as always, to get the damn race traitor libtards to admit that IkesenDan is too a smart boy. A good and smart boy! And the libtards and their libtard race traitor politicians are NOT good and smart.

This is still coming from an FBI interview of one employee. Could be right. Who knows?

Who won? Be gas if it was Hillsboro, though of course lol HS sportsball.

Yeah, I just don't see that as a good thing overall. It's important as a matter of freedom that people can campaign when and how they want. If early campaigning (like massive hidden campaign donations) rose to the level that it not only threatened, but actually and severely assaulted the democratic process, then it could be worth looking at restricting the freedom of speech here, but I don't think it's even close. And if some lesser known candidate or party needs to get out really early to have any chance, then they should be able to do so.

(I know you were just stating a fact - not making an argument about it)

Guys it's totally okay for Russia to interfere in our elections because we did it to someone else. They should drop a couple of nukes on us too in honor of Yamamato. Fair is fair.

Oh, don't worry, there are many libs who will get to vote for Killary 10 times, so you're gonna be ok. You've also made a great point, the other shoe is about to drop.

It's so weird how it's just IMPOSSIBLE for conservatives to even figure out what the scandalous thing is, because lol they need their 10 year olds who are just so good with computers to ****ing set up autopay.

We've tried it being that it was in a closet. We've tried that it was full of classified information.

My guess is that really attacking her on either of those was too complicated for the senile brain of Mr. Trump, so now the NEW NEW thing is that she deleted personal emails. What? If she didn't delete them, she would have no obligation to turn them over. What's the scandal here again?

I've only voted for Hillary twice so far. Kind of slacking this year.

Bill Clinton spent his entire presidency from the 1993 Oslo Accords to the 2000 Camp David summit trying to get to those elections in Palestine.