Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
MMA Thread MMA Thread

11-13-2013 , 06:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by elliot10181
I think Brown would be pretty much fodder for even a below peak GSP, although he's on a good run he's shown weakness even in some of those wins.
Yeah, I agree that GSP should convincingly beat a dude like Brown but I also think Brown is highly underrated, especially in his ground game.

Last edited by Synth; 11-13-2013 at 07:11 PM.
MMA Thread Quote
11-13-2013 , 07:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmanpoker
Why does everyone use the this guy beat this guy while this guy lost to this guy so there for this guy will beat this guy.
It's not math when you're just factoring in the way they looked in the standup. RDA was boxing Cerrone's ears off, while Dunham IMO (and the opinions of most) beat RDA in a mainly standup fight.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SwoopAE
Considering a decent bet on GSP assuming he looks good at weigh-ins and is still available for -230ish or whatever but I feel like the casual fan money may have poured in on him by then

Will def go bigger if I can get -200, honestly Hendricks has a round or two to land a big punch that puts GSP out or he's going to be on his back or getting jabbed to death and by round 3-4 he'll be out of gas after 10-15 mins of GSP smothering him
I'm not so sure casuals aren't gonna be pounding Hendricks. I've talked to a few who are all about Hendricks being the man to end GSP's reign. Casuals in general all seem to hate GSP.

Would have loved to get Beltran at +335 or whatever against Rampage, not sure if there's value now.
MMA Thread Quote
11-13-2013 , 07:28 PM
Going Dunham for 0.5 and Dunham dec for another 0.5 at +220. Also taking Story dec, think he is the likely winner here and he rarely finishes (3 UFC finishes - Mulhern, Hazelett and Foster). Furthermore, TWAS has never been KO in over 50 career fights.
MMA Thread Quote
11-13-2013 , 07:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokeranibal
Johny Hendricks talks about his VADA/WADA feud with Georges St-Pierre.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUtM5xAL1sA
Just watched the video

Didn't realise WADA keep your blood for 12 years and any time a new test comes out re-test it. Not surprised GSP didn't want any of that! Hendricks comes across pretty well.
MMA Thread Quote
11-13-2013 , 07:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by just_mo
Dunham dec for another 0.5 at +220. .
Great bet,
MMA Thread Quote
11-13-2013 , 08:24 PM
Hendricks does come off sounding very legit here. In addition I think Hendricks does have a good shot at winning this fight, IMO seems like GSP is fading. If Hendricks doesn't beat GSP then I think someone else will dethrone in the near future.
MMA Thread Quote
11-13-2013 , 11:43 PM
article just released a couple hours ago. Hendrix pretty much accuses GSP of using performance enhancing drugs.

http://mmajunkie.com/2013/11/13/john...-by-the-drugs/
MMA Thread Quote
11-14-2013 , 12:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SwoopAE
@mmanpoker Dunham beat Sherk convincingly (you would struggle to find 1 person out of 100 randoms watching the fight who think he lost), he beat Tibau who is a legit 12-20 ranked guy, he beat RDA in the eyes of the majority of people, he beat Lentz who is now a top 10 FW, Escudero was unbeaten at the time and while he's terrible now, he was coming off a win over Cole Miller and only went on his downward spiral a year or so later

Cerrone's 5 best wins are Siver, Oliveira, Stephens, Guillard and Varner and Dunham's 5 best performances are Sherk, Lentz, Dos Anjos, Griffin and i'll throw in going to a close decision with TJ Grant where he goes 4-1 with competent judging. Cerrone also has a loss to Varner so that only half counts.

You could also say if he was lucky with judging Dunham could easily be 17-1, if he had gotten the nod over Sherk, Grant and RDA, people would be saying he deserves a number 1 contender fight at the very least

Cerrone can beat him it's not like it's a lock or anything but with Cerrone's mental flakiness, bad gameplanning and generally awful performances recently, I can't see how he's a favourite. I'd cap Dunham at -150 or so.
I said his best win was a loss to Sherk. It was his signature fight....in 2010

Sent from my XT907 using 2+2 Forums
MMA Thread Quote
11-14-2013 , 12:44 AM
Jumping on the Dunham bandwagon....1u at -105 at 5dimes. Wish I had gotten in on Dunham by decision before it dropped.
MMA Thread Quote
11-14-2013 , 12:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmanpoker
I said his best win was a loss to Sherk. It was his signature fight....in 2010

Sent from my XT907 using 2+2 Forums
Except he beat RDA but the judges robbed him. Doesn't change how good he looked. Also Tibau has been beating everybody.
MMA Thread Quote
11-14-2013 , 12:53 AM
@swoop or anyone else betting Chael, please tell me how he possibly beats Rashad. I think generally both are overrated, but I'm having a hard time figuring a way an under sized Chael can win. If Phil Davis loses to Rashad then Chael has to.

Anyway putting a healthy bet on Rashad @ -210

Sent from my XT907 using 2+2 Forums
MMA Thread Quote
11-14-2013 , 01:01 AM
chaels got a bunch of trophies on his wall that say he can beat rashad

this card id be super surprised if most the favorites won it seems like a underdog card
MMA Thread Quote
11-14-2013 , 01:02 AM
Which ones?
MMA Thread Quote
11-14-2013 , 01:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmanpoker
@swoop or anyone else betting Chael, please tell me how he possibly beats Rashad. I think generally both are overrated, but I'm having a hard time figuring a way an under sized Chael can win. If Phil Davis loses to Rashad then Chael has to.

Anyway putting a healthy bet on Rashad @ -210

Sent from my XT907 using 2+2 Forums
undersized Chael?

Also, Phil Davis' takedown offense is not in the same league as Chael's. Phil Davis won the NCAA title in wrestling but that could literally be done without ever scoring a takedown. I don't know what Phil's style was though.

I still expect to see Rashad win, but I can envision Chael taking him down enough to win. He did it to Bisping and Okami, and they both dwarf Rashad, and Chael's the only one to do that to either of them IIRC.

I think Rashad might be smart to try to take Chael down.

Last edited by anteatereater; 11-14-2013 at 01:29 AM.
MMA Thread Quote
11-14-2013 , 01:11 AM
Dunham Cerrone id cap at evens. Hard fight to predict, too many factors involved and I don't see any of the fighters being a huge underdog on the sites so I'm staying away from that one. Same goes for Koscheck Tyrone.
MMA Thread Quote
11-14-2013 , 01:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by anteatereater
undersized Chael?

Also, Phil Davis' takedown offense is not in the same league as Chael's. Phil Davis won the NCAA title in wrestling but that could literally be done without ever scoring a takedown. I don't know what Phil's style was though.

I still expect to see Rashad win, but I can envision Chael taking him down enough to win. He did it to Bisping and Okami, and they both dwarf Rashad, and Chael's the only one to do that to either of them IIRC.

I think Rashad might be smart to try to take Chael down.
I meant in comparison to other LHWs. Rashad fought Davis who is a big LHW with superb wrestling. I know its not Chael offense but its pretty damn good. I see Rashad using his wrestling to not be taken down and wins a boxing match. Probably 29-28 after Chael starts fast and wins 1st round with a TD.

Sent from my XT907 using 2+2 Forums
MMA Thread Quote
11-14-2013 , 02:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmanpoker
I meant in comparison to other LHWs. Rashad fought Davis who is a big LHW with superb wrestling. I know its not Chael offense but its pretty damn good. I see Rashad using his wrestling to not be taken down and wins a boxing match. Probably 29-28 after Chael starts fast and wins 1st round with a TD.

Sent from my XT907 using 2+2 Forums
Okay, I see what you mean.

I just think Chael's takedown offense is way better than Davis' even when accounting for Phil's size. That's why I think Chael has a chance to beat Rashad even though Phil Davis probably has very little chance to beat Rashad.

The weird thing is Chael was an elite international Greco-Roman wrestler, which meant he had no reason to ever train double-leg takedowns after college (where he was not elite). One would think he would be good at throws and clinch stuff. Daniel Cormier and Randy Couture were elite Greco Roman wrestlers too and they fight/fought like it.

By the way, Rashad Evans was a very mediocre college wrestler. His career record was only 48-34. Phil Davis went 112-17. Ben Askren was 153-8.
MMA Thread Quote
11-14-2013 , 02:28 AM
Phil Davis won the NCAA title in his senior year. He did lose earlier in the year to Chris Weidman though. Weidman also beat Bader.

They all wrestled in the 197 pound class. Rashad competed at 174 pounds, same as Josh Koscheck, Ben Askren and Jakob Volkmann. In fact, Rashad's final match in 2002 was against Volkmann. Rashad lost. In MMA, they fight 50 pounds apart.

Below is a photo of Weidman, Bader and Davis in 2006.



Rashad's college roommate was 157-pounder Gray Maynard.

Last edited by anteatereater; 11-14-2013 at 02:44 AM.
MMA Thread Quote
11-14-2013 , 02:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by anteatereater
The weird thing is Chael was an elite international Greco-Roman wrestler, which meant he had no reason to ever train double-leg takedowns after college (where he was not elite).
No. Simply not true at all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by anteatereater
undersized Chael?

Also, Phil Davis' takedown offense is not in the same league as Chael's. Phil Davis won the NCAA title in wrestling but that could literally be done without ever scoring a takedown. I don't know what Phil's style was though.

I still expect to see Rashad win, but I can envision Chael taking him down enough to win. He did it to Bisping and Okami, and they both dwarf Rashad, and Chael's the only one to do that to either of them IIRC.

I think Rashad might be smart to try to take Chael down.
But Evans is a much better wrestler than Bisping and Okami, regardless of if you think MWs somehow could "dwarf" a LHW. (Pictures? Something?)
MMA Thread Quote
11-14-2013 , 02:38 AM
Dont look at those statistics blindly, mma wrestling is a different matter. Rashads record in wrestling outside mma isn't so good, but his mma wrestling is among the best. I don't remember him being taken down that often, except when he gets rocked but I don't see him being rocked.
MMA Thread Quote
11-14-2013 , 02:47 AM
Bader with some random teammate:

MMA Thread Quote
11-14-2013 , 03:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by just_mo
No. Simply not true at all.
Oh yeah, you're right. I misread World University Championships for World Championships. Big Difference.

Quote:
Originally Posted by just_mo
if you think MWs somehow could "dwarf" a LHW. (Pictures? Something?)
Okami and Bisping are both listed at 6-2. Rashad is 5-11 and not thickly muscled or anything. Dwarf might be an exaggeration, but they surely have bigger frames. I understand that taller doesn't always mean bigger.

FWIW, here's a bisping-evans staredown.

http://www.allwrestlingsuperstars.co...el-Bisping.jpg

Last edited by anteatereater; 11-14-2013 at 03:23 AM.
MMA Thread Quote
11-14-2013 , 03:30 AM
Obv they have shoes on there but it looks like Bisping has an inch, maybe 2 on him.

And yeah World University is pretty minor league.

I read BE's breakdown of Rashad's collegiate wrestling career today, he was actually pretty decent. Beat a dude in the NCAA tourney who would go on to become a 3x national champ. Finished just short of AA honors in what sounds like a tough weight class. Sonnen only made AA once, and it sounds like his weight wasn't that tough that year. Overall doesn't seem like there's much, if any, difference between their college wrestling careers.

Rashad should be stronger and he's quite a bit younger as well. Outside of the Nog fight, his fight IQ has always been pretty damn good. I think he will take what Sonnen gives him (i.e. shoot if he sees an opportunity, land some strikes if he sees that) and win this. Not sure if there's line value tho.

ummm just saw this on twitter:

Nurmagomedov wrestling a bear?!

No wonder the Russians are crushing everyone...THEY GROW UP WRESTLING ****ING BEARS.

Last edited by just_mo; 11-14-2013 at 03:49 AM.
MMA Thread Quote
11-14-2013 , 05:56 AM
It's not nurmagedov.
MMA Thread Quote
11-14-2013 , 06:07 AM
Haha who knows, if it is it's funny, if not still funny I suppose.
MMA Thread Quote

      
m