OK so as I have mentioned I have been gradually pulling together an MMA database. It's now ready to do some work. My approach is that rather than trying to flat out handicap fights like somewhere like
BreakDownFights, I am trying to figure out ways in which MMA betting markets are predictably biased. To give you an example of a null result, I theorised that having lost your last match, or being on some sort of losing streak, might mean that a fighter's odds are too generous. I checked this against my DB and it turned out not to be true, but that's an example of the sort of thing I am doing (though I'm also looking at attributes of the fighters, not just their history). The downside of this is obviously that the market might smarten up and I won't be able to tell, but I am testing whether the biases I find are diminishing over time. The advantage is that I can (hopefully) bet profitably on fights where I know nothing at all about fighters beyond some basic stats.
I haven't analysed as much stuff as I intend to eventually, but I've looked at enough stuff to feel confident in making some picks. Rather than units I'm betting etc, I'll break stuff down to 1, 2, and 3 star picks depending how confident I am. Obv I am betting more and less based on this but also on odds (smaller odds = larger bets, Kelly style). I'm also not giving odds to take because these picks are based on closing lines. I have no idea what the lines should actually be, I'm just telling you the lines are biased one way or another in general. I am giving you the odds I actually bet on though. I would wait til close to bet but because of the time difference the prelims kick off at 6:30am or some **** here.
Onwards to victory!
Tomorrow's fight card:
3 star plays:
Rua v Vera (I took 1.285)
De Fries v Thompson (I took 1.505)
(BEST BET of the card)
2 star plays:
Gamburyan v Omigawa (I took 1.617)
Grispi v Yahya (I took 1.617)
Johnson v Swick (I took 2.81, sucks cause 5Dimes was 2.9 but I'm 5Dimes busto)
1 star plays:
Moraga v Gomez (I took 2.36)
Also, my analysis suggests a small bet on
Prado v Davis but I am inclined to ignore this as these really long odds bets are a terrible deal. I took a small amount at 6.56 just because it will tilt me if I ignore the analysis and it wins, but I think it is probably not +EV. I won't count this as an actual recommended play for record keeping purposes.
No bets:
Machida v Bader
Miller v Phan
Varner v Lauzon
Last edited by ChrisV; 08-04-2012 at 10:12 AM.