Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
SSNL [cheese] thread: NOV Pt 2 (nc) SSNL [cheese] thread: NOV Pt 2 (nc)

11-17-2007 , 05:18 AM
mynameizgreg's video is very good for the first 15 minutes as well.
11-17-2007 , 05:19 AM
Yes that's 6.5 buy ins in the last 200 hands of the day.

11-17-2007 , 05:19 AM
We are working on getting the videos to run more smoothly, we don't expect it will be an issue in the near future.

Edit: if anyone has any issues you can send any of us a PM or contact us through LeggoPoker
11-17-2007 , 06:05 AM
Brag: FTd the turbo hundo.

Beat: finished 8th for 650 or something
11-17-2007 , 06:55 AM
How come all the regs threads were locked?
11-17-2007 , 07:13 AM
Quote:

How come all the regs threads were locked?
Run their course, flaming, datamines being posted, etc. The mods seem open to reinstating them though.
11-17-2007 , 07:15 AM
Quote:
Quote:

How come all the regs threads were locked?
Run their course, flaming, datamines being posted, etc. The mods seem open to reinstating them though.
Datamines aren't allowed? Why not?
11-17-2007 , 07:31 AM
I don't think it's that they're disallowed, just that one or more of the mods thought having that sort of thing posted wasn't for the best and in combination with the other factors mentioned swayed their decision to lock the threads.
11-17-2007 , 07:54 AM
Keep em open.....

They're harmless...
11-17-2007 , 08:12 AM
I don't get what makes the regs threads appropriate for MSNL but not SSNL?

People who think they're circle jerks can just avoid them, but for mine they were just places where people who played in the same games could talk with each other. I followed the Party thread for a while then the FTP thread, and no feathers were ever rustled in either. I never saw anyone outed involuntarily or anything like that, they were just a bit of fun. They also gave people a venue to discuss site specific issues when they arose. It just strikes me as weird to ban them.
11-17-2007 , 08:14 AM
2/4 NL, sixmax

villain has only sat for an orbit and has done nothing worth mentioning (ie vpip of 12, hasnt tangod with anyone)

*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Hero [Xy Xz]
UTG folds
Hero raises to $12
SB calls $10
BB folds
*** FLOP *** [8d 8c 5c]
SB bets $203.40, and is all in

what is your minimum hand for calling here?
11-17-2007 , 08:19 AM
Poker Stars
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $1/$2
5 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
Hero: $190
CO: $200
Button: $414.40
SB: $160.10
BB: $24.65

Pre-flop: (5 players) Hero is UTG with 8 A
Hero raises to $6, CO folds, Button calls, SB folds, BB calls.

Flop: T 7 A ($19, 3 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $14, Button raises to $34, BB folds, Hero raises all-in $184, Button calls.

Turn: 6 ($387, 1 player + 1 all-in - Main pot: $387)


River: 7 ($387, 1 player + 1 all-in - Main pot: $387)


Results:
Final pot: $387

Do you fistpump this W AK if you are villain?
11-17-2007 , 08:30 AM
ofcourse, if he has AK then you must have AT/A7/77, same hand, or huge draw

of which only half like BOOMshove the flop like that

AK is the nizzles sssoonnn!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
11-17-2007 , 08:33 AM
Quote:
what is your minimum hand for calling here?
Jacks maybe. Yeah I think I'd muck TT w/o reads for 100bb but JJ+ would do it.
11-17-2007 , 08:34 AM
Meh.. I might fold jacks too. Depending on whether I run hot or not.
11-17-2007 , 08:35 AM
ok cool, i called with a five
11-17-2007 , 08:36 AM

Board: 8c 8d 5h
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 42.671% 41.88% 00.79% 156714 2970.00 { 55+, AKs, AKo }
Hand 1: 57.329% 56.54% 00.79% 211566 2970.00 { JJ }
11-17-2007 , 08:37 AM
Lol. What did he have?

EDIT: Ah didn't notice it was 2/4. For 50bb I'd def. stick it in much lighter. But still not with a naked 5.
11-17-2007 , 08:37 AM
KT
11-17-2007 , 08:46 AM
Does anyone have custom PAHUD layout for OnGame/PokerRoom and want to share it with me? Please?
11-17-2007 , 09:10 AM
Quote:
mynameizgreg's video is very good for the first 15 minutes as well.
where are the videos on the site? i click vids but it says there arent any up yet.
11-17-2007 , 09:18 AM
Quote:
I don't get what makes the regs threads appropriate for MSNL but not SSNL?

People who think they're circle jerks can just avoid them, but for mine they were just places where people who played in the same games could talk with each other. I followed the Party thread for a while then the FTP thread, and no feathers were ever rustled in either. I never saw anyone outed involuntarily or anything like that, they were just a bit of fun. They also gave people a venue to discuss site specific issues when they arose. It just strikes me as weird to ban them.
QFT. Please open
11-17-2007 , 09:27 AM
some people say its unlucky to win the first hand of the day.... i say [censored] that

Pacific Poker
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $0.25/$0.5
6 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
UTG: $22.81
UTG+1: $76.25
CO: $52.08
Button: $10.83
SB: $38.71
Bub: $50

Pre-flop: (6 players) Bub is BB with K Q
UTG calls, UTG+1 raises to $1, 3 folds, Bub calls, UTG calls.

Flop: T K 2 ($3.25, 3 players)
Bub checks, UTG bets $2, UTG+1 calls, Bub raises to $6.5, UTG folds, UTG+1 calls.

Turn: Q ($18.25, 2 players)
Bub bets $13, UTG+1 raises to $26, Bub raises all-in $29.5, UTG+1 calls.

River: 6 ($99.25, 1 player + 1 all-in - Main pot: $99.25)


Results:
Final pot: $99.25
Bub shows K Q
UTG+1 mucks A T
11-17-2007 , 10:09 AM
So far I can see the first frame of the video's at LeggoPoker. The rest of the video won't load.

If I'm prompted to login, no pages will load afterwards just the green background.

The "remember me" doesn't work.

I'm on XP using and old version of IE. So far i'm really disappointed
11-17-2007 , 10:32 AM
Quote:
I don't get what makes the regs threads appropriate for MSNL but not SSNL?

People who think they're circle jerks can just avoid them, but for mine they were just places where people who played in the same games could talk with each other. I followed the Party thread for a while then the FTP thread, and no feathers were ever rustled in either. I never saw anyone outed involuntarily or anything like that, they were just a bit of fun. They also gave people a venue to discuss site specific issues when they arose. It just strikes me as weird to ban them.
Yeah, completely agree. I'd gotten more active in the Party thread in the last 3 weeks, and there was a definite sense of community. I'd love to see them reopen, although i assume there was a legitimate reason they were locked, so i'll wait for the official green line.

      
m