+1

No, because look:

this is why i can't beat 400nl

lol

i wish i played everyday with guys who minraised/called 96s OOP and then donked 3x AI on terrible boards for it. maybe it's not obvious from the hand but he did not have the image for this to be a reasonable bluff. i was calling all rivers.

i mean no offense, but your lack of understanding of poker has led you to incorrect conclusions. Preflop is super standard and besides the flop lead (which isn't that bad) his line is fine, lol at "he did not have the image" making this play bad, the way you talk about hands its obvious you just don't really understand poker that well.

Also calling "any" river is just awful, without being results oriented your play in the hand is much worse than his if you intended to call 2 with the intention of calling river on any runout.

Well that was a friendly response. I can't see how min raise/call 96s oop (and utg) is super standard.

you seem a bit angrier than normal. i'm sorry that's the case.

haha, wtf is going on in ITT?

posting that hand just annoyed me thats all, thought that was a pretty interesting and reasonable line by that guy and while mediocre small stakes regs are quick to the "lol spewy ape fish" conclusion.

So the guy should donk bet Ax/face card bluffs/bdfd's on the flop? ok

Yeah that has to be a troll

i am being completely serious, without getting into a deep strat discussion, besides 96s being a super light open utg and the flop lead being somewhat suspect, the rest of the hand is fine. Terps flop and turn calls and subsequent river calls on non 7 rivers are way worse, a call/call/call line is going to be way way way worse than just folding the flop or folding the turn.

I mean do you guys even play poker anymore, just curious? At the risk of sounding like a bigger douche, I do work really hard on my poker game everyday and play in some of toughest games online atm, so this level of hand history and strat discussion is beneath me to have, especially on a public forum. Regardless of if the fish is thinking or just clicking buttons the line that he took is actually better than the hero's line in the hand. I'm not trolling at all.

Anyways, i thought no poker talk itt?

We don't have a cheese thread anymore, so thought we agreed poker is fine. I guess I'll leave this hand alone since we're all obviously clueless and the superior one says hero played like a donk. Button clicker's line makes total sense!

Well at least you realized it was a risk...

[spoiler]seriously though wtf klink, get off your high horse.

[spoiler]and yes I do still play poker online...[/spoiler]
[/spoiler]

i wouldn't really say there was any "risk" of that not happening lol

whatever dawgs, haters gonna hate. At the point where everyone thinks one thing and can't even begin to grasp the hand besides "lol this guys a fish" then whats the point. All im saying is the fish played his hand better than the reg who posted the the hand laughing at the fish.

Definitely a troll, wp klink

I haven't missed **** here

agree with klink fwiw

and why no one says whats up with 3bet pre, not very cool to have 77 in ur mp vs utg 3betting range?

villain has all the AQ/AJ/AT combos in his perceived range too when bb cold calls while hero isnt perceived to be 3betting depolarised mp vs utg(granted after seeing 77 thats not true) so its not that unreasonable for him to have a fairly wide donking range here..

.

fyp

Klink I think you're incorrectly assuming the 96hh guy ever takes this line with a value hand.

If he never has a value hand here, is his line still reasonable?

You guys (klink and shipit) are assuming villain is a reg?

I don't know how to put this, but I'm kind of a big deal.

definitely enjoying the confetti around this hand.

guy was a certified 80vpip droolbox who donked randomly and repeatedly without regard to board texture/changes. at the risk of feeding the troll(s?), i'll concede that my EV is higher folding some rivers. if my inability to calculate this on the fly means i don't work hard enough on my game, then you got me!

ADK