As I have already explained, I am Einstein2. However if it helps your concentration for you to picture me as Goofyballer, or Jman220, or Jmakin, or whomever else you like, please feel free to.

Now that we have that out of the way, I continue to be curious about the catalyst for your verbal excreta, and your delusions of grandeur. If you are unwilling to have a serious dialogue about the existence of any level of self-doubt, perhaps you will take the time to regale us some more about your invisible friends? That is easily the most interesting thing that you have posted about in the last several hundred pages, and you continue to leave us in suspense. Regretfully, since your posting privileges have been so restricted across various media, this conversation can only be accomplished here.

Vigorous debate and a little fun, here we come!

Oh. Ok, I see it.

Things you make up in your mind brain palace, through some combination of confusion and maliciousness, aren't "facts".


The innocent black boys, remember? Rotting in prison after some stuff you made up, while you masturbate to donald duck? It's kinda like that.


I'll address the rest of your marvelous tale in the next post.

Ok, yeah, Goofyballer has too much self-respect to even fully fake being this stupid.

Let's keep a fact-to-lie tally. Although fwiw, as mentioned, this all might actually be genuinely confusing. So they wouldn't be strictly "lies". But for keystroke brevity we'll call them such.

Fact: 1
Lie: 0

Oh snap the facts pull out to an early lead!

Are you the sole arbiter of the truth in this exercise, or are your invisible friends voting as well?

We are all Jmakin.

Facts: 0
Lies: 1

No, he's Jmakin, you're Jman. On different online venues and social media, the same person can have different screennames on each one, if they desire. It's really super simple.


I shouldn't have to tap the sign again.

I was just trying to figure out why you two were so horny. If you can stop being horny that will probably put the topic to rest.

I am disappointed, but not surprised, that you have failed to “address the rest of my marvelous tale.”

This term is both offensive and ableist. Not quite as offensive as comparing a mixed-breed dog to a human being, but you should consider self-moderating in the future, lest you find yourself removed from what appears to be the final forum that still allows you to post.

1 - 1


1- 2

1 - 3


2 - 3!


2 - 4

2 - 5


2 - 6

The last two might be too abstract, I'll admit. You imply there's a specific thing I should have doubt about, and some specific thing I'm saying some other group are wrong about (something not dog related).

I am aware. This is why I already pointed it out.



**** you're so dumb. How many black boys did you send to jail just on some dumb **** like that?

They both have legs. (a different number though)

Walk me through in your own words why that's so offensive, and to whom.

Are you tagging back in?

Let's do the ELI5 thing like you originally didn't know you wanted and needed.

Observe the post above this one about both humans and dogs having legs, and proceed from there.

It’s not my job to teach you. Try some self-reflection.

The fact that you are aware makes your usage of it worse, not better. Do you understand why?

You appear to be fixated with “black boys.” You have now referenced them, in one form or another, in over ten separate posts. Are they part of your invisible fan club, cheering you on?

You are also intensely interested in sexual relationships with fictional cartoon characters. Fascinating.

What now this Einstein guy is trying to make bangers.

Well.

That happened.

I eagerly await your answer.

lol