Moo, Bigot,

do you believe that if I drop a rock it will move towards earth with an acceleration of about 9.8m/s^2

Jupiter is very visible right now. I will be tracking it to see how much the moons move.

So far one thing that doesn't add up in heliocentrism is the fact that jupiter was full 2 days ago while the moon was still gibbous.

And who can explain this



What goes up must come down. No one is arguing with that.

You need to explain how "what goes up must come down" includes water sticking ABOVE the air at the bottom of your model of BALLCRAP. Or the moon safely hovering above us. Or the earth not barelling into the sun.

And don't give me your pseudo scientific excuses (dark matter, dark energy, etc). Those are just gaps waiting to be reverse engineered

(Generically) A way to measure would be to find when there is no shadow cast, then move to west location and when there is no shadow cast again you'd know Sun was in same location then work out the math.

Moo - You missed this one.

If I drop a rock from the north pole or the south pole it will fall towards the earth in the same way if it hits the earth it stays "stuck" against the earth, if I do it with water the same thing happens, we call this gravity you call it "what goes up must come down".

The fact is that Newton's theory of gravity can very accurately describe how this rock moves towards the earth, whether you call it gravity or not. This theory can also be used to describe the movement of planets.

moo,

You've lost me here.... You're claiming that density is really what we're mistaking as gravity, right? So you're relying on an argument based on chemistry to support your claim, and at the same time you're claiming that science is a lie?

Is chemistry responsible for keeping us on the ground or isn't it?

It's not hovering, it's orbiting. The moon has forward momentum (purple in the gif) and that combined with gravity (orange) makes the object move in a curve.



(This gif is not about the moon but about a thought experiment called Newtons cannonball.)

Why? I thought I read up thread that the images you see when you look through a "telescope" were all pre programmed as part of the conspiracy?

Mmmkay, the Earth is accelerating 'upward' at a constant rate of 9.8m/s^2. Since the Earth is pushing you upwards, you are moving at the same speed as the Earth When you jump (or any object goes up), your (its) upward velocity is for a moment, greater than the Earth's so you rise above it. But after a few moments, the Earth's increasing velocity due to its acceleration eventually catches up.

So what goes up must come down really means, what goes up will eventually be overtaken by the earth as it rises at 9.8m/s^2, at which point the object that went up will appear to have come down. Hope that helps.

Chase, unless you're moving upwards faster than 9.8m/s^2 you will always be on the ground. It has nothing to do with gravity.

I'm sorry but you're going to have to do a bit better than "work out the math". You have described a way to measure the time of the motion of the sun through the sky. How do you turn a measurement of time into a measurement of speed, which is what that "sun speed" calculation supposedly does? (Hint: it involves distance).

Moo, bigot-

The sucess of any model depends on the accuracy of the observations used to construct it and, ultimately, on its ability to predict future events and observations. The tenets of heliocentrism and a spherical earth, coupled with Newtonian gravitational laws and Einstein's relativity, have, for example, allowed the "indoctrinated" folks to very accurately predict the planets' orbits and such things as solar and lunar eclipses. As-matter-of-fact, I'm so convinced of their prediction that I'm taking off work on August 21, making an hour and a half drive to witness totality that will last for 2 minutes and 33 seconds at my destination.

Without commenting on the validity (or lack thereof) of the observations used in the construct of your FE model, I would appreciate it if you could tell where to plan another total solar eclipse trip in 2019. I'm especially interested seeing the assumptions used in your calculations.

Iow, please show your work. Thx.

So you do believe that some force is at work. You just choose to not call it gravity.

This thread got so much more readable putting moo on ignore.

I wonder how old the earth is in this theory, that it's been accelerating at g for that long.

Shill post. No one thinks this except for balltards trying to debunk the model by misrepresenting it.

So now you guys are claiming that light gasses exist beneath heavy gasses? So much for your beloved gravity. You guys have what's referred to in intellectual circles as "cognitive dissonance"

Not surprising, since it's the only way to support the globe model.

It's even more amazing, because we know that g isn't exactly the same everywhere on earth which means that the earth is being torn apart under that model.

This is an amazing post.

moo,

What is fog?

Checkmate

moo,

Do you believe a compass or any similar navigational aid like that can be used to make sure you are traveling in a certain direction?

Watch the whole video. You're wrong, sadly.

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/...6288#msg566288

lol globetards gonna globetard

for what I think is the 4th time.. You are linking to CONTROLLED OPPOSITION

This is like when someone posts an article from infowars, breitbart, or wikileaks and thinks its true.

Lies and deception, for one purpose:

DIVIDE AND CONQUER

https://wiki.tfes.org/Universal_Acceleration