Very good point! You could be on to something.

"Because it has to" isn't an answer. Why can't air be on the bottom? What actually causes denser objects to settle lower than less dense objects?

Snaring a TBAB is the only item on the transgender agenda that I've read about so far, but I haven't read the whole thread. Surely there is more to it than just that.

99 wins the internet once again

Last time this came up, the pretended flat-earthers went away (and ShaneG actually banned himself) because they couldn't explain why cyclones and anti-cyclones rotate in opposite directions in the northern hemisphere as compared to the southern hemisphere. Northern hemisphere cyclones rotate anti-clockwise, northern hemisphere anti-cyclones clockwise. In the southern hemisphere, the situation is reversed. This occurs because of the rotational speed gradient of the Earth from pole to equator -- the Coriolis effect -- and the respective pressure gradients of cyclones and anti-cyclones. The flat-earth model cannot explain it.

And any mention of density and buoyancy is an admission of the law of gravity.

There are some beautiful pictures taken by Bormann and Lovell on Gemini VII and Schirra and Stafford on Gemini VI when they rendezvoused to within 1ft of each other in low Earth orbit in December 1965. Perhaps you're too young to remember.

From Apollo 9 in March 1969, there's a much reproduced photo of David Scott, in his bright red helmet, emerging from the hatch of the command module Gumdrop, photographed by Russell Schweickart from the porch of the lunar module Spider with which Gumdrop was docked. The Earth, including the curvature of its horizon, can be seen just over 100 miles below. Computer-generated imagery was not possible at that date. There is a less well-known picture, taken at the same time by Scott, of Schweickart taking Scott's picture, with his custom-made pistol-grip Hasselblad camera well to the fore. There are also pictures of Spider later on, undocked and 'flying' free, with the Earth below and the clouds and their shadows on the ocean. Had you been around at the time, you would know all this.

I'm not sure what you're trying to say with the first video (or the second one for that matter), but the simplest explanation for what you're seeing is that it's a view of a star or planet through an unfocused telescope. Occam's razor combined with my limited astronomical experience tells me so.

Another FE myth debunked!

Explored cave today with my kids. Saw lots of stalactites with drops of water clinging to the bottom .

Also I train judges who do death investigations in Texas. Several of them got called out for when Columbia disintegrated on re-entry. What exactly was it that they saw? Where was it coming from?

Imagining a conversation between moo and his kids.

"Daddy, why is the sky blue?"
"What else would it be?"
"Why don't fish breath air?"
"That wouldn't make any sense."

Its heavy because its heavy duh.

Surely this is actual mental illness not just simple ignorance?

MooBuckets, are planets and moons sphere shaped? Do they spin? Do they orbit the sun? Do they orbit the earth? Are they "in relations" to the heliocentric earth?

ARE THERE PLANETS? DO PLANETS MOTHER ****ING EXIST OR ARE THEY PUT THERE BY NASA??

Moo,

How do you explain hurricanes in a FE society?

Kind of curious how compasses work in the FE model..."North" should be the center of the disc, right? so if you start at any point, facing North and draw a line between due West and due East, then extend that line and travel in either direction along that line, you will eventually reach the ice wall, right?

In the lolglobehead model, if you start facing North, draw a line between due West and due East and then travel along that line, you would eventually return to your starting point.

I wonder what would actually happen in a practical experiment? If only there were some way to verify this...

Moo,

Bigfoot. You thoughts?

What goes up, must come down. Heavier things come down first (Earth and Sea are the heaviest) and as you go up, the other, lighter things find their level. There's this picture I've seen, where someone filled a glass with an assortment of objects and liquids. The liquids (vegetable oil, water, dish soap, honey) all are perfectly separated and the objects (cherry tomato, bottle cap, bolt) find their own levels in the glass. It's cool.

How does that prove water is pushing UP at the bottom of the globe while the air sits underneath it. Unless your mind is so hopelessly globewashed you forgot that what goes up must come down.

GLOBEHEAD>No, because any place on a globe is the top! Therefore the water is always beneath you
FLATMAN>Oh wouldn't that mean that if two people travel to each other from 500 miles away, they're both going 250 miles downhill? What if two other people were meeting us from two different locations?! Wouldn't they also be going downhill!? Is the earth a giant hole? How can you have your globe AND live on it, too?

How does 'what goes up, must come down' stretch so far to "confirm" that the moon and the sun are millions of miles apart and are somehow the exact same size when viewed from the ground. THE EXACT SAME SIZE. Out of all the possibilities, and BY ACCIDENT?

If you believe the earth is a ball, you'll believe ANYTHING
GLOBEHEAD>

You forgot to dodge this one.

Oh wait, no you didn't.

Why?

Why?

For the rest of the folks who aren't just trolling or being willfully obtuse or just being stupid or whatever, this is pretty awesome:

Why is 7 a bigger number than 5? How does 5 know to come before 7? Why doesn't 7 think to come before 5? What can we call this?

You answered it yourself. Mass is weight. No need to attach us all to a gigantic black hole because of that. Seems like a stretch to EVERYONE at first, before the PROGRAMMING starts to kick in.

By the way, planets are not other rocks or gas balls in a vacuum, according to FE. Lurk more. Read the thread. Just suck it up and do it.

RakeMePlz: See above

If you don't know the difference between a liquid and a solid then so and so science class, uneducated such and such, prekindergarten knowledge etc etc.

anyone with enough money to rent a plane is in on it

What is this, the philosophy forum?

Look, it's only "DOWN" due to PERSPECTIVE.

If the earth were actually upside down, diagonal, or sideways we'd still be stuck to it. And we'd still think its beneath us. What other way could it work? It's a sequence. From heavy to light. Very simple to grasp.

On the other hand, how obvious is it that this is supposed to justify the wonky, off center orbits of comets? Or the moon constantly facing us 100% of the time. Things you can actually SEE.

You have to start from scratch. All these references back to globe theory shows you guys aren't getting anywhere.

And so we end another day where the flat earth society decides that making YouTube videos is a more effective way of blowing the lid off the biggest conspiracy in the history of humanity, than say, hopping on a plane with a GoPro.