Hi guys and gals! I am contemplating on moving away from poker stars, how do you interpret this comparison? I play 10-25nl.
http://www.rakeback.com/poker-rake/c...vs-partypoker/
Obviously rakeback sites are sponsored and therefore aren't a good source for partial information. I also checked the rake levels stated by poker stars and party themselves, and found these:
https://www.partypoker.com/how-to-pl...structure.html
https://www.pokerstars.eu/fi/poker/room/rake/ (sorry, in Finnish but you get the point)
While pokerstars has a slightly lower rake% at 4.5% vs. 5%, the rake cap is 4 x compared to party (2 vs 0.5)! This is supposed to mean that almost all pots played on stars pay a 4.5% rake, while many pots on party reach the cap, leading to a lower average rake%.
So how does party have a clearly higher avg rake/100 hands than stars?
My conclusion is that the only reason for this is that Party has to have juicier games. Avg rake/100 hands is of course affected by avg size of pots and avg players / flop. Thoughts? What else could explain clearly lower rates of rake/100 on stars?
TL;DR:
Rake % on party is lower than on stars, yet on party, players pay more rake/100 hands. Therefore 10NL-25NL games on party must be juicier than on Stars. Thoughts?