Quote:
Originally Posted by mark32607
No. People were dumb and quick to blame Comcast. It turned out to be a bovada issue like always, so Comcasts track record is perfectly fine.
You think by now people would realize the issue is ALWAYS on bovadas end. Do not blame AT&T this time for bovadas issues.
Bovada has more network issues then any other online site around, but if you are a USA player you have no choice but to deal with it.
I don't necessarily disagree with where the finger pointing should go in regards to the AT&T/Comcast vs BV issue with disconnects. I'm not involved in the poker world as much these days, but a quick Google search and you'll find mixed reports on the Comcast vs BV issue.
Example:
http://pokerfuse.com/news/poker-room...-mar-30-31-03/
Bovada continues to fleece winning players but the one thing they've done relatively well is stay transparent with their decisions and act quickly when things go sour (their customer service center in the Philippines for example). If BV references some problems with ISP's then I believe there is some truth to it.
Let me just say that all U.S. facing poker sites = lipstick on a pig. There isn't any ideal situation, this is obvious to anyone. With that said, WPN has had way more connection issues than BV has with software. In regards to the entire package and where one puts most of their volume, its really a personal preference and what is most important to that player and their poker goals and games played etc.