Quote:
Originally Posted by Equilibria
I posted for the sole reason of warning other forum members who might not be aware of possible legal ramifications. They can do their own research and make a decision on what path to pursue. Bovada has offered other solutions not involving the use of a corporation that may be more palatable.
thats my point....we dont want to incriminate Bovada unnecessarily either.
anyways your post was fine...its informative and def helpful for other players.
I'm just saying it may not be the best idea to openly discuss something that crosses into being "complicit in money laundering and fraud." maybe you won't need to cross that line, but I'm sure there are players including 2+2ers who are already doing this because they need to continue pulling off large wires(from binks/heaters, people playing higher stakes, etc).
Quote:
The reason people do not put bank names is to reduce the chances that a bank representative googles her bank name and finds information in the thread that would help her identify gambling transactions. There is already more than enough information in this thread to incriminate Bovada with the government if they weren't already sufficiently incriminated so I don't think we need to worry about that.
that may also be true...but im almost certain the main reason we dont get too specific with check info/bank names...is to help prevent things like gov't agencies from busting processors, or for the banks themselves to stop accepting their checks/wires.
anyways its not my call, just don't want to give any LEO's easy access to incriminating information that they may not have known about(especially in certain states).
Last edited by MerginHosOn24s; 11-14-2014 at 06:15 AM.