Open Side Menu Go to the Top

07-30-2014 , 03:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFizzbin2
Lol I mean just lol

Well berty, I'm sure you're balling with Dan B. and crushing the highest stakes games.

Thanks for sharing your wisdom with us, I think 2+2 would be smart to snap you up, and provide a dedicated forum for all your wisdom on a variety of topics.
I knew AK was a drawing hand.
View: Bart Hanson not very good ?
$25m Guaranteed WPM on CoinPoker
Join the action now
Daily Rewards • Splash Pots • CoinRaces
View: Bart Hanson not very good ?
07-30-2014 , 03:15 PM
Did someone ITT just brag about winning a pot with AK?
07-30-2014 , 03:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrindPokerAllDay
OP, you may not realize this but Doyle is 80 years old.
Also kind of dumb to call Doyle bad when he has made a career of using a vastly different skill set than the average NLHE player. He's not playing the same game.
07-30-2014 , 05:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 20th Level Ranger
Also kind of dumb to call Doyle bad when he has made a career of using a vastly different skill set than the average NLHE player. He's not playing the same game.
Obviously, lifetime hands played not a large enough sample size to determine whether he was actually good or just running way over EV.
07-30-2014 , 07:08 PM
all i'm saying is if we could just get Bart to Palestine there wouldn't be any more problems.
07-30-2014 , 07:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrtblake
and the vast majority of people in those 80 countries don't watch the ****ing thing, thanks for bringing up something completely irrelevant from a few days ago which no-one, especially not me, cares about.
Oh you real bro mad. It was relevant to the point you were making. Now stop being mad.
07-30-2014 , 07:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dagrims
Obviously, lifetime hands played not a large enough sample size to determine whether he was actually good or just running way over EV.
In before some tard doesn't realize this is a level and posts a 'doyle is most likely on a 50 year heater because xyz' post.
07-31-2014 , 12:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrindPokerAllDay
x/r river unless villain is planning to check river in which case you should lead (unless villain has a 6 or better in which case you should fold turn)
u mean fold flop. good analysis
07-31-2014 , 12:24 AM
view: its so easy to get responses out of people because the truth gets under your skin
07-31-2014 , 12:50 AM
im curious to why banhmibandit is viewed negatively by the live pros?

Is it the coaching issue?
07-31-2014 , 03:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BertMcgert
u mean fold flop. good analysis
Yeah, my bad. You are correct as usual. That's why you're the best in the business.
07-31-2014 , 05:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BertMcgert
here's a hand i played today- lets see how bart would of played it.

sb with AKo 10 handed- btn raises i 3bet he calls, everyone else folds.

flop is 643r i x/c flop- bart bets and gets raised off his hand

turn is 6o- i x/c turn

river is A- i x/c river. win pot

also- bart just found a niche before other people- its like saying doyle brunson is good at poker. no hes awful but he was around before anyone so you just show him respect and take it easy on his many glaring leaks.
What about the 87% of the time the river doesn't have an ace?
07-31-2014 , 11:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BertMcgert
view: its so easy to get responses out of people because the truth gets under your skin
At this point it's obvious you're just a troll trying to get responses out of people. Good on ya, you got what you wanted.
07-31-2014 , 11:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MK7749
im curious to why banhmibandit is viewed negatively by the live pros?

Is it the coaching issue?
lol have u played at the same table with david chan before?
07-31-2014 , 01:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrindPokerAllDay
Live is soft because none of the pros are any good. It's the same set of amateurs playing live and online but different pros. Live pros couldn't even beat $1 Double or Nothings I suspect.
Not true at live 100/200 FL, the list of regulars is filled with people that beat Stars 10/20 - 30/60 in the past.
07-31-2014 , 01:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 20th Level Ranger
Did someone ITT just brag about winning a pot with AK?
And playing it questionably to put it mildly.
07-31-2014 , 03:10 PM
Played with Bart a few times. I played with Bart in NL games he was good. Bart is good in LO8/Stud8 mix game. I ran good in PLO vs Bart.

My advice is to play against Bart in PLO and run good vs him.
07-31-2014 , 03:50 PM
Check raise the river and he will fold his entire non-nuts range..easy money
07-31-2014 , 04:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by massivetilt99
Check raise the river and he will fold his entire non-nuts range..easy money
sounds like you can go to the bike and print money! why are you not on a flight??
07-31-2014 , 07:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rakes
lol have u played at the same table with david chan before?
guy is one of the most annoying and classless regs
07-31-2014 , 08:52 PM
Lol this Limon guy is still around posting this nonsense regarding online vs live poker after all these years? For those unaware, he's your typical washed up live bumhunter reg that tries to rationalize his inferior skill by any means possible. Just listen to a few of his blogs where he openly admits to being a king bumhunter/ratholer. I believe Shane (noluck17), another commerce reg, also mentioned in his deuces plays interview with Bart that Limon was one of the many live fishregs walking around commerce casino complaining that games are so tough, even though he (shane) felt games were extremely soft. Either mentioned in podcast or thread somewhere.

Anyhow, I've never met a single solid MSNL+ winner online that would struggle to beat a 5/10nl live game. The only people who could possibly still believe that a solid winning MSNL player online might struggle live are people who aren't MSNL+ winners themselves. Anyone else with a clue knows this. All the big live games these days where the big money is being made are completely lined with online winners for a reason.
07-31-2014 , 11:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rakes
lol have u played at the same table with david chan before?
+1. David Chan is a beast, I loved his videos on CrushLivePoker.com -- I hope he makes more.
08-01-2014 , 12:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by boobies4me
Lol this Limon guy is still around posting this nonsense regarding online vs live poker after all these years? For those unaware, he's your typical washed up live bumhunter reg that tries to rationalize his inferior skill by any means possible. Just listen to a few of his blogs where he openly admits to being a king bumhunter/ratholer. I believe Shane (noluck17), another commerce reg, also mentioned in his deuces plays interview with Bart that Limon was one of the many live fishregs walking around commerce casino complaining that games are so tough, even though he (shane) felt games were extremely soft. Either mentioned in podcast or thread somewhere.

Anyhow, I've never met a single solid MSNL+ winner online that would struggle to beat a 5/10nl live game. The only people who could possibly still believe that a solid winning MSNL player online might struggle live are people who aren't MSNL+ winners themselves. Anyone else with a clue knows this. All the big live games these days where the big money is being made are completely lined with online winners for a reason.
Im still around and youre still following me around. how my azz taste?
08-01-2014 , 12:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by clutch352
What about the 87% of the time the river doesn't have an ace?
i was ahead the whole time, thats what u dont get.
08-01-2014 , 12:46 AM
Tough talk for a guy who rivered an ace.
View: Bart Hanson not very good ?
$25m Guaranteed WPM on CoinPoker
Join the action now
Daily Rewards • Splash Pots • CoinRaces
View: Bart Hanson not very good ?

      
m