View: Bart Hanson not very good ? - Page 14 - Poker News

Two Plus Two Forums Poker News & Discussion News, Views, and Gossip

View: Bart Hanson not very good ?

Closed Subscribe

...

Page 14 of 24

First

4 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

Last

Page 14 of 24

First

4 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

Last

07-30-2014 , 03:13 PM

#326

networth

veteran

Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 2,208

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrFizzbin2

Lol I mean just lol

Well berty, I'm sure you're balling with Dan B. and crushing the highest stakes games.

Thanks for sharing your wisdom with us, I think 2+2 would be smart to snap you up, and provide a dedicated forum for all your wisdom on a variety of topics.

I knew AK was a drawing hand.

$25m Guaranteed WPM on CoinPoker

Join the action now

Daily Rewards • Splash Pots • CoinRaces

07-30-2014 , 03:15 PM

#327

20th Level Ranger

centurion

Join Date: Aug 2012 Posts: 171

Did someone ITT just brag about winning a pot with AK?

07-30-2014 , 03:23 PM

#328

20th Level Ranger

centurion

Join Date: Aug 2012 Posts: 171

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrindPokerAllDay

OP, you may not realize this but Doyle is 80 years old.

Also kind of dumb to call Doyle bad when he has made a career of using a vastly different skill set than the average NLHE player. He's not playing the same game.

07-30-2014 , 05:57 PM

#329

Dagrims

journeyman

Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 369

Quote:

Originally Posted by 20th Level Ranger

Also kind of dumb to call Doyle bad when he has made a career of using a vastly different skill set than the average NLHE player. He's not playing the same game.

Obviously, lifetime hands played not a large enough sample size to determine whether he was actually good or just running way over EV.

07-30-2014 , 07:08 PM

#330

jinzerd

old hand

Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 1,875

all i'm saying is if we could just get Bart to Palestine there wouldn't be any more problems.

07-30-2014 , 07:31 PM

#331

Tommy_Tomich969

veteran

Join Date: Jan 2012 Posts: 2,013

Quote:

Originally Posted by jrtblake

and the vast majority of people in those 80 countries don't watch the ****ing thing, thanks for bringing up something completely irrelevant from a few days ago which no-one, especially not me, cares about.

Oh you real bro mad. It was relevant to the point you were making. Now stop being mad.

07-30-2014 , 07:34 PM

#332

Tommy_Tomich969

veteran

Join Date: Jan 2012 Posts: 2,013

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dagrims

Obviously, lifetime hands played not a large enough sample size to determine whether he was actually good or just running way over EV.

In before some tard doesn't realize this is a level and posts a 'doyle is most likely on a 50 year heater because xyz' post.

07-31-2014 , 12:20 AM

#333

BertMcgert

centurion

Join Date: Nov 2013 Posts: 115

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrindPokerAllDay

x/r river unless villain is planning to check river in which case you should lead (unless villain has a 6 or better in which case you should fold turn)

u mean fold flop. good analysis

07-31-2014 , 12:24 AM

#334

BertMcgert

centurion

Join Date: Nov 2013 Posts: 115

view: its so easy to get responses out of people because the truth gets under your skin

07-31-2014 , 12:50 AM

#335

MK7749

veteran

Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 2,173

im curious to why banhmibandit is viewed negatively by the live pros?

Is it the coaching issue?

07-31-2014 , 03:03 AM

#336

GrindPokerAllDay

banned

Join Date: Jan 2014 Posts: 2,326

Quote:

Originally Posted by BertMcgert

u mean fold flop. good analysis

Yeah, my bad. You are correct as usual. That's why you're the best in the business.

07-31-2014 , 05:03 AM

#337

clutch352

adept

Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 929

Quote:

Originally Posted by BertMcgert

here's a hand i played today- lets see how bart would of played it.

sb with AKo 10 handed- btn raises i 3bet he calls, everyone else folds.

flop is 643r i x/c flop- bart bets and gets raised off his hand

turn is 6o- i x/c turn

river is A- i x/c river. win pot

also- bart just found a niche before other people- its like saying doyle brunson is good at poker. no hes awful but he was around before anyone so you just show him respect and take it easy on his many glaring leaks.

What about the 87% of the time the river doesn't have an ace?

07-31-2014 , 11:18 AM

#338

TBadr

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 5,669

Quote:

Originally Posted by BertMcgert

view: its so easy to get responses out of people because the truth gets under your skin

At this point it's obvious you're just a troll trying to get responses out of people. Good on ya, you got what you wanted.

07-31-2014 , 11:50 AM

#339

rakes

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 3,703

Quote:

Originally Posted by MK7749

im curious to why banhmibandit is viewed negatively by the live pros?

Is it the coaching issue?

lol have u played at the same table with david chan before?

07-31-2014 , 01:10 PM

#340

spino1i

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 8,713

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrindPokerAllDay

Live is soft because none of the pros are any good. It's the same set of amateurs playing live and online but different pros. Live pros couldn't even beat $1 Double or Nothings I suspect.

Not true at live 100/200 FL, the list of regulars is filled with people that beat Stars 10/20 - 30/60 in the past.

07-31-2014 , 01:47 PM

#341

OvertlySexual

veteran

Join Date: Jan 2014 Posts: 2,319

Quote:

Originally Posted by 20th Level Ranger

Did someone ITT just brag about winning a pot with AK?

And playing it questionably to put it mildly.

07-31-2014 , 03:10 PM

#342

PokerMentor

newbie

Join Date: Mar 2014 Posts: 45

Played with Bart a few times. I played with Bart in NL games he was good. Bart is good in LO8/Stud8 mix game. I ran good in PLO vs Bart.

My advice is to play against Bart in PLO and run good vs him.

07-31-2014 , 03:50 PM

#343

massivetilt99

journeyman

Join Date: Jul 2012 Posts: 389

Check raise the river and he will fold his entire non-nuts range..easy money

07-31-2014 , 04:19 PM

#344

psychosocial

old hand

Join Date: Nov 2012 Posts: 1,345

Quote:

Originally Posted by massivetilt99

Check raise the river and he will fold his entire non-nuts range..easy money

sounds like you can go to the bike and print money! why are you not on a flight??

07-31-2014 , 07:02 PM

#345

cheet

veteran

Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 2,498

Quote:

Originally Posted by rakes

lol have u played at the same table with david chan before?

guy is one of the most annoying and classless regs

07-31-2014 , 08:52 PM

#346

boobies4me

veteran

Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 2,233

Lol this Limon guy is still around posting this nonsense regarding online vs live poker after all these years? For those unaware, he's your typical washed up live bumhunter reg that tries to rationalize his inferior skill by any means possible. Just listen to a few of his blogs where he openly admits to being a king bumhunter/ratholer. I believe Shane (noluck17), another commerce reg, also mentioned in his deuces plays interview with Bart that Limon was one of the many live fishregs walking around commerce casino complaining that games are so tough, even though he (shane) felt games were extremely soft. Either mentioned in podcast or thread somewhere.

Anyhow, I've never met a single solid MSNL+ winner online that would struggle to beat a 5/10nl live game. The only people who could possibly still believe that a solid winning MSNL player online might struggle live are people who aren't MSNL+ winners themselves. Anyone else with a clue knows this. All the big live games these days where the big money is being made are completely lined with online winners for a reason.