Quote:
Originally Posted by durrrr
thats ridiculous wording by them and not true. a ponzi scheme doesnt have a huge source of income. there were many things about ftp in 2011 that were like a ponzi scheme, but ponzi's schemes dont make tens of millions of dollars a year.
Although I understand what you mean by rake, I think what the DOJ mailer defines as its iteration of a Ponzi scheme is one where players who purchase chips were defrauded. It is no different than if you give Bernie Madoff $100 million to invest in the stock market and he pockets it. While FTP isn't a stock market, it is a portfolio based market. One in which you expect players funds to be held, not used for the benefit of the owners of the company. A portfolio with nothing backing it is essentially worthless, that is exactly what FTP allowed while its owners pumped their pockets will joy. Rake wasn't enough apparently and greed took over, sad but true.
In this very instance the issuance of 443 million of players funds, not profits of the company, puts it under the umbrella of a fraudulent scheme to extract money.
Although the intricacies don't need to be fully developed in my arguement I will say that this should not be shocking to anyone. Entities that don't follow under the long arm of the law, won't abide by it. Especially when there are no laws to fall under in the first place. Sad as it is, I doubt the DOJ can actually prosecute these guys for anything other than breaking hard book bound laws.
I am sorry that you ever associated with FTP, but I still respect you as a player for your game. Whilst poker players aren't always the highest of moral character this is a low blow to many of their supporters. Full Tilt Poker, learn to play, chat and get ripped off by the pros....