Quote:
Pretty sure aboriginal cases are heard in the US District Court, not State Court. and are covered under a different part of the US Constitution than the Interstate Commerce Clause. So that's how they'd be allowed to offer games to other states and countries, and won't be breaking the law.
Whether or not this site'll gain traction is a whole other issue.
What ???
Maybe you can put some of your pronouncements into perspective under actual legal frameworks:
25 USC Section 2701 (5):
(5) Indian tribes have the exclusive right to
regulate gaming activity
on Indian lands if
the gaming activity is not specifically prohibited
by Federal law
and is conducted within a State ...
See, also,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian...Regulatory_Act
This limiton tribal gaming to Indian lands is particularly true with Class II
gaming. So, if a state legalized Internet bingo or poker, tribes could also conduct those
games online, and would not need a tribal - state compact.
But players would have to be
physically present on Indian lands. There might be ways around this –
proxy play for bingo has been tried – but that would not work with poker.
http://www.indian.senate.gov/sites/d...mony020912.pdf
Last edited by Geezer Soze; 05-05-2016 at 07:37 PM.