Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Maurice Hawkins experience at k NLHE WSOP today Maurice Hawkins experience at k NLHE WSOP today

06-17-2014 , 08:45 PM
didnt know who maurice hawkins was so had to google him, looks like purple aki...
06-17-2014 , 08:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoGGz
My first thought when opening this thread is "Who the **** is Maurice Hawkins and why does he have his own NVG thread?"

It's OK OP. He's not as well known as he probably thinks he is.
He's relatively well known in Florida and maybe the southeast because he's had a few decent cashes and is one of the most boisterous players on the felt, but you are 100% correct that he's not as well known as he thinks he is. I've always gotten the impression that he truly believes he's the greatest gift to poker, ever.
06-17-2014 , 09:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by D_Matthews
She did set them down in front of her but was indicating mucking by her body language. I considered it a mucked hand but the cards were not anywhere near the muck and the dealer was making zero effort to retrieve them. I feel that she could have alleviated this particular incident by pushing the cards more forcefully toward the muck because she knew what my issue was but I don't fault her considerably for this. The dealer was the biggest problem here.
You've already explained this many times OP. Browser obv can't read.
06-17-2014 , 09:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by runqmc88
1. It wasn't just "someone," it was 2 semi-notable pros. People tend to share stories of their interactions with semi-notable pros on 2+2...

2. 800 words is not a novel.

3. I'm sure the OP will have no problem moving on with his life. You seem butthurt over his supposed butthurt.
Not sure why you singled out my post when tens of other posters have echoed the same thing, but:

1. Maurce Hawkins isn't a notable poker pro. Nobody knows who he is aside from those who have played with him.

2. It's called hyperbole. And lol @ arguing over semantics.

3. Cool story bro. OP seems like a majorly sensitive child who had to resort to writing an 800 word exposition in an effort to destroy the reputations of two people because some nobody was rude to him at the poker table.

Whether you agree with how OP acted at the time or not, I don't see how anyone can defend OP coming in here and writing this novel that is clearly designed to harm the reputation of someone who was rude to him and also someone who simply didn't rush to his defense and maybe smirked or rolled her eyes or something.
06-17-2014 , 09:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonsterJMcgee
Not sure why you singled out my post when tens of other posters have echoed the same thing, but:

1. Maurce Hawkins isn't a notable poker pro. Nobody knows who he is aside from those who have played with him.

2. It's called hyperbole. And lol @ arguing over semantics.

3. Cool story bro. OP seems like a majorly sensitive child who had to resort to writing an 800 word exposition in an effort to destroy the reputations of two people because some nobody was rude to him at the poker table.

Whether you agree with how OP acted at the time or not, I don't see how anyone can defend OP coming in here and writing this novel that is clearly designed to harm the reputation of someone who was rude to him and also someone who simply didn't rush to his defense and maybe smirked or rolled her eyes or something.
OP has every right to write this. More people should be calling out this wanna be tough guy douche Maurice.
06-17-2014 , 09:30 PM
06-17-2014 , 09:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by greg nice
Maurice sounds like a loser

and so do you

he apologized, yet you still try to revenge him. you actually look like the bigger tool. its convenient that you 'dont remember' how the 33 hand played out. i'm gonna guess that the decision was probably super trivial and that Maurice might've had a point. i don't like to push the lower players to act faster early on, but maybe he doesn't care
"Lower players". Is that how you really think of us? Jesus, May all your draws miss for a week for a comment like that.
06-17-2014 , 09:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by darthsikle
"Lower players". Is that how you really think of us? Jesus, May all your draws miss for a week for a comment like that.


Sent from my SPH-L710 using 2+2 Forums

I'm guessing it's a typo of "slower".
06-17-2014 , 09:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by YappingYoda
OP has every right to write this. More people should be calling out this wanna be tough guy douche Maurice.
Yes, I want people to be uncomfortable acting like *******s and calling out bad behavior is one of our best tools, especially when the floor is just going to give him warnings over and over. What ever happened to the penalty tracking system and escalating punishments?
06-17-2014 , 09:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by YappingYoda
OP has every right to write this. More people should be calling out this wanna be tough guy douche Maurice.
Ok, there's a difference between warning everyone about a scammer and warning everyone about someone who's kind of obnoxious. You can just call the floor or ask him directly to stop instead of slinking off and blogging about it on 2p2.

Also, even if publicly shaming MH is somehow necessary and for the greater good of the poker community (lolz), it doesn't mitigate the fact that OP took this opportunity to denigrate Maria Ho essentially because she didn't jump to his defense. I don't think it was fair of OP at all to drag other people into this -- especially when they did virtually nothing wrong AFAIK.
06-17-2014 , 09:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonsterJMcgee
Ok, there's a difference between warning everyone about a scammer and warning everyone about someone who's kind of obnoxious. You can just call the floor or ask him directly to stop instead of slinking off and blogging about it on 2p2.

Also, even if publicly shaming MH is somehow necessary and for the greater good of the poker community (lolz), it doesn't mitigate the fact that OP took this opportunity to denigrate Maria Ho essentially because she didn't jump to his defense. I don't think it was fair of OP at all to drag other people into this -- especially when they did virtually nothing wrong AFAIK.
read the thread, he did call the floor and Maria slowrolled/angleshot

Melanie makes an appearance in this thread
06-17-2014 , 09:49 PM
I asked Maria about this incident today.

06-17-2014 , 09:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dantes
read the thread, he did call the floor and Maria slowrolled/angleshot

Melanie makes an appearance in this thread
I've read everything. Read my post. I was speaking in generalities about handling MH, and also re-read the second paragraph of what I wrote, which actually is the crux of my argument.
06-17-2014 , 10:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maria_Ho
I never post on here but feel the need to because OP has very inaccurately and incorrectly described what happened at the table in regards to me and my involvement in what happened. I don't take it lightly when someone misrepresents me and my poker etiquette.

I can not corroborate or defend Maurice's actions. We are not friends. We are poker acquaintances and he has never done or said anything mean to me. What OP said Maurice did is more or less accurate from my recollection. OP saying that I was supporting Maurice and his actions because we are a clique or whatever is so untrue and off base. I never through my actions supported Maurice's actions towards OP. Maurice was sitting next to me and we were talking. That's it.

On the other hand, OP severely misrepresented what happened in the interaction between him and I. First off, I pride myself in being extremely nice and friendly both on and off the poker tables. You would be very hard pressed to find anyone who will say otherwise unless they were a complete jerk to me first in which case I always do and always will stand up for myself. I love nothing more than a fun and friendly table atmosphere when I play. I would never without reason do anything to make people at the table feel intimidated or uncomfortable. PERIOD.

In regards to the hand against OP where I triple barreled and then mucked? I did NOT muck right in front of me. I was sitting in seat 7. On the river after I bet and he called, I announced "You're good, you got it." Then I mucked my hand towards the dealer. The actual muck pile was on the left side of the dealer where seats 1,2,3 were. But my cards were basically a hand's length reach away from the dealer and no longer in front of me. The dealer didn't automatically reach for my hand to put along with the rest of the muck. Instead she first started making change for the river bet. I had bet something like 2300 and he called with two 1k chips and one 500 chip and she was in the middle of making change when OP basically starts screaming at her yelling "MUCK HER HAND", "WHY WON"T YOU MUCK HER HAND". At this point the dealer gets VERY flustered and looks like a deer in headlights and the floor comes over. After the floor comes over and the incident is described to him he basically says, "Ok, that's fine, even though her hand wasn't physically pulled into the muck once she concedes the pot and mucks (as in folding towards dealer) her hand is dead, but I understand your point and it should have been pulled into the muck regardless before you showed your hand." After the floor walks away I even chime in and say to OP, yes I totally understand your point and she should have put my hand in the muck but you didn't have to yell at her. I validated his point but was just trying to remind him that he didn't need to be so mean to the dealer about it. At no point was I trying to not muck my hand, let's make that clear. And if we could get everyone from the table on here they would corroborate that. I do not appreciate how OP tried to represent me and that situation as if I was trying to angle shoot or something. I conceded the hand and the pot, but WSOP rules state that a hand must be shown to win the pot whether it is an all in situation or not and so it's not my fault that the dealer didn't know right away to pull my hand into the muck. I very clearly mucked towards the dealer and out of my immediate reach and even verbally conceded. I don't tolerate players being mean to the dealers. Sure they make mistakes from time to time but they are people too. We don't have the right to make them feel like pieces of **** because they make a mistake when they are only human. And they are defenseless against the players. They can't talk back out of fear of losing their job yet players can make them feel like total pieces of ****. Sorry not sorry that I won't stand for that.

I'm done posting in this thread and I have no interest in reading anything else from this point forward. I was told about this thread by a friend of mine since I don't read NVG and once I read the OP's post I felt compelled to come on here to defend myself. I don't care when people want to judge my looks or poker abilities but when they want to misrepresent my character and demeanor at the table then I take severe offense to that. I have very high standards of professionalism and take being a poker pro very seriously even if some people don't see poker as a real profession. It is what I do to make my living. I rely on it for income. I respect it.

And as far as other stupid comments on me not playing on my own money etc. etc. We can just clear that up right now. I have been very fortunate to do ok in poker and have been playing professionally for 10 years. I have NEVER been staked or backed. Occasionally I will sell pieces for higher buy-ins or tougher events to reduce variance. I very often buy pieces of other players in fact. I also co-stake a player with someone else. For people to just assume I don't play on my own dime is silly and probably sexist. I worked my way up in stakes all on my own and am very proud of that fact.

Thanks for taking the time to read. Good luck everyone. And to the OP, I am sorry that you had a bad experience at the poker table yesterday. I do not think Maurice was right in what he did. Hope you have better experiences at the WSOP.


Very good post. I am not saying that because Maria Ho is a cutie either(not sexist)
06-17-2014 , 10:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SrslySirius
I asked Maria about this incident today.

It sounds like she did what a lot of people do that don't want to show their hand, the say "you win" and wait till their opponent turns over their hand before mucking, this is BS, either show your hand or fold it, enough with this pushing your hand 1 centimeter forward making it ambiguous to the dealer and then demanding to see your opponents hand, that's a straight up angle shot, especially if it's a timid amateur dealer scared to death to make a mistake, they will never grab your hand from right in front of you. She says she "verbally conceded the pot" what is she talking about? By her statements it's obvious it was an unconventional "fold", I mean she had to clarify that it was "verbally conceded". Fold your hand, throw it to the muck, once it's in the muck then you can ask about your opponent's hand. This behavior wastes time and if the dealer doesn't drag the cards into the muck because they are still in front of you where a live hand would be, it's an angle shot that exploits less assertive dealers. She seems like a nice person but wtf was she trying to do by not throwing her hand into the muck and instead "verbally conceding" while her cards were "within reach of the dealer", seriously what was she doing? Was she trying to needle him? Angle shoot him?

I've been burned at the WSOP by a similar situation and the OP is within his rights and actually should wait till the dealer drags her hand into the muck before tabling his hand. Last year at the WSOP I was in the BB, the SB completed and the hand was checked all the way to the river when the SB open folded his hand by throwing towards the muck. Someone then said a winning hand has to be shown so I turned my hand over for the nut low 23, the SB had folded 24 so it would have been a chopped pot, but he already folded.

As soon as I showed my hand, the SB grabs his cards and turns them over to show the 24 for a chop. The dealer starts pushing me the pot and the SB protests, a floor is called and the floor declares the SB hand is dead and to push me the pot.

Two minutes and several hands later the floor comes back and reverses the decision saying he checked with his supervisor and since the dealer hadn't dragged the hand to the muck it was still a live hand. He then made me give the amount of 1/2 the pot to the SB. I couldn't believe it but according to WSOP, unless your hand is actually in the muck, it's still live.

It wasn't a big pot but since then, if a player doesn't want to show their hand due to embarrassment or range protection, I wait till the dealer drags the hand to the muck before tabling my hand as required. If you don't want to get angle shot, intentionally or otherwise, in a marginal situation you should do the same. If they want to open muck, make them open muck completely.

Last edited by JCHAK; 06-17-2014 at 10:28 PM.
06-17-2014 , 10:12 PM
slow news day?
06-17-2014 , 10:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by binksy
You've already explained this many times OP. Browser obv can't read.
LOL. He has explained it many times. He just says something different than what Maria said she did. To those of us who can read, "setting her cards directly in front of her" doesn't equal "I very clearly mucked towards the dealer and out of my immediate reach". I was simply asking OP why the difference, and he still insists she set the cards directly in front of her, which Maria denies.
06-17-2014 , 10:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fslexcduck
Maria is an awesome poker player and person and it's really annoying that some f you make certain assumptions based on how she looks and her gender. It really is amazing to me that some people still think there isn't sexism in poker.
Not sure if serious
06-17-2014 , 10:28 PM
Maurice was playing a $125 single table satellite with me and a few other amateurs and satellite grinders at last years WSOP. At first he was just a dick (specifically to the obvious amateurs). After quickly spewing a bunch of his chips he got involved in a hand with an older gentleman (likely a weekend warrior) ~ before acting the older gentleman kindly asked if he could see what was left of Maurice's stack. Maurice said tersely, "You have me covered!". I suppose the older fella was curious to know how much he had exactly and asked again. Maurice childishly flung his arms in the air to reveal his stub. He lost soon thereafter - but I'll never forget the time I played with the biggest ass ever.

Anyways, there is no promise of proper behavior and mutual respect at a poker table (just like in real life).

If you're stuck playing with Maurice and want to screw with him just try this: After he's spewed off a bit - ask to see his chip-stack - it will send him on tilt.
06-17-2014 , 10:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCHAK
Two minutes and several hands later the floor comes back and reverses the decision saying he checked with his supervisor and since the dealer hadn't dragged the hand to the muck it was still a live hand. He then made me give the amount of 1/2 the pot to the SB. I couldn't believe it but according to WSOP, unless your hand is actually in the muck, it's still live.
This is pretty standard in any vegas room; cards must touch the muck to be considered mucked.
06-17-2014 , 10:38 PM
I can attest to this part.

Where Maria first started playing, and where I know her, Commerce, verbally conceding the pot IS binding. Or at least it was in like 2008 when I played there with her. \\

Yeah, I thought it was ****ing insane, but apparently if you said 'you win' that meant they won. I can vouch for her in regards to that's how the rules at Commerce were/are? and that is definitely where Maria started playing poker.
06-17-2014 , 10:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by browser2920
LOL. He has explained it many times. He just says something different than what Maria said she did. To those of us who can read, "setting her cards directly in front of her" doesn't equal "I very clearly mucked towards the dealer and out of my immediate reach". I was simply asking OP why the difference, and he still insists she set the cards directly in front of her, which Maria denies.
Why does she specify that she "verbally conceded the pot" and that the cards were "within reach of the dealer"? Even from her account of things it's pretty clear that it was a non standard fold where she still had her cards in front of, or close to, her area and simply stated that "you win" while simultaneously wanting to see his hand. I wouldn't have shown my hand until her hand clearly pulled into the muck, not going to put a lot of stock in her "verbal concession" while the cards are still within her proximity.

Show or effing throw. Quit wasting time.
06-17-2014 , 10:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbbbb33
I can attest to this part.

Where Maria first started playing, and where I know her, Commerce, verbally conceding the pot IS binding. Or at least it was in like 2008 when I played there with her. \\

Yeah, I thought it was ****ing insane, but apparently if you said 'you win' that meant they won. I can vouch for her in regards to that's how the rules at Commerce were/are? and that is definitely where Maria started playing poker.
Well that is unequivocally not the rule at WSOP, you can even throw your hand towards the muck but if it's identifiable you can retrieve it. Saying "you win" wouldn't even be the proper declaration anyway, you would need to specify your action as in "I Fold". Again, show it or throw it.
06-17-2014 , 10:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SrslySirius
I asked Maria about this incident today.

Ah so MH thinks that ethics are very important in poker yet she is best friends with Melanie Weisner who helped facilitate millions of dollars being stolen from poker players.

Makes sense

Why are live pros such ****ing morons?
06-17-2014 , 10:46 PM
i live in fla so sometimes i come across maurice.

one time I'm playing 2/5 waiting for an open seat at the 5/10. maurice doesn't usually play cash but it was a sunday and i think he had just busted day 2 of a big multi entry $330 tourney.

he's at my table and in 2 or 3 orbits is just being a complete ******* to a few older dudes. he's giving his money away i guess on tilt from busting. so i have to open my big mouth and say something like "dude what is your problem just mind your own business let people play how they want."

that didn't sit well. i can't remember everything he said besides him challenging me to a hu 25/50 10k buyin. i didn't have 10k on me but i knew he probably didn't either. so i accepted and said lets go. so he flags the floor guy over and he asks us if we are serious i said yes and maurice didn't say another word. then i got moved to 5/10 an orbit or 2 later.

      
m