Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players

07-30-2011 , 09:20 PM
[IMG][/IMG]



Someone ask about the New Orleans game cheating. This is an image of the card that was sent to me after one of the players confiscated a couple of the cards from the game that suspected foul play. It's an image of a copaq playing card that came from a deck in which the cards had a thin film layer of infared wavelength viewable backs. It was used in a 10 25 50NL game in which the cheaters were reported to have won around 300k in a couple a few weeks.

The cards were regular copaq playing cards that looked normal under visible light but when put under a certain wavelength of EM in infared spectrum the backs of the cards become viewable. These cards were ordered & special made, I heard around $3000 a deck.

This could obviously be used inside a casino as well as all camera systems are equipped with infared capabilities, many of the casino patents from companys like Bally, IGT, Shufflemaster & others describe many of these card recogniton methods in detail. Radio Frequency identification can also be used to identify cards.

I dont want to start this up in this thread, but what Fish & some others are referring to that I have mentioned is new technology (which is now patented by ARL, Bally & Cantor Gaming) decribes a system in which physical playing card decks indentical to the KEM cards being used now in casinos can be synthesized with certain type of molecules where the images of the cards can be changed from one card to another as viewable to us in the visible spectrum using certain wavelength & pattern of Electromagnetic Radiation. As far fetched as this will sound to most people, This technology does exist , is patented & I currently have one of the cards. I will not reply anymore about this inside of this thread as I would like to keep on subject. If the moderators would allow more talk on this I would continue it in another thread, but it seems that whenever I have mentioned this in the past , the thread is closed.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-30-2011 , 09:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDDtown
I dont want to start this up in this thread, but what Fish & some others are referring to that I have mentioned is new technology (which is now patented by ARL, Bally & Cantor Gaming)
If this is true it should be really easy to verify, right?

http://www.google.com/patents
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-30-2011 , 10:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDDtown
Samoleus, If you are really intent on playing then let me know when you want to come down & come up with some type of structure & if it looks fair then we will go with it. My only request is that this will not be done inside a casino.

Also where will you be coming from? I will send you a private message with contact
EDDtown, I will be coming from Boston. Let's agree on the logistics of the match first, and then we can pick a date. Here is my proposal:

- We will play a HU cash game (as opposed to freeze outs) in order to minimize the luck factor.

- We will sit with 250BB to start; the shorter stack will be required to rebuy to 250BB any time his stack drops below 150BB. This will also guarantee that we are always playing with effective stacks of at least 150BB, thus reducing the effects of luck and variance.

- We will play until one player wins a total of 40K or more from the other - superceded only if BOTH players agree to quit before that.

- I am happy playing in a casino. However, if you are not comfortable with that, you can arrange a venue and dealers that you like. The dealers must be professional dealers.

- We will both agree not to wear sunglasses or hooded sweatshirts.

Please let me know if you agree to these terms. Once you agree in principle, we can work out the logistics of when I will be coming down. I'm looking forward to it!

By the way, to the others in this thread, I just want to point out that EDDtown did in fact send me a private message with his phone number. I would like to hammer out the details of the match publicly here on 2p2 so that there is no chance that either of us can back out. However, I did want the other posters to know that he did send me a private message with his contact information as he said he would do earlier in the thread.

EDDtown, please let me know if you agree to my proposal. If you don't agree, please let me know what and how you would like to modify.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-30-2011 , 11:16 PM
I like the idea of steady blinds & maintaining a minimum stack size, I just wonder if we should incorporate an upside stack size as well & remove some of the money in play at some level. The only reason I say this is that we could play a long time back & forth & reloading only in the end both of us end up super deep & stack the other in one lucky hand.


Although it isn't likely, theroretically we could both end up with close to 40k stacks & be even then win it all in one hand.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-30-2011 , 11:20 PM
Also, what blinds do you suggest we play? Based on 150BB reload, It sounds like somewhere between 10/20 & 20/40NL. I would suggest it be a half sb/bb ratio rather than a 10/25NL since its a HU match
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-30-2011 , 11:29 PM
take on samoleus please really wanna see him run you over
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-31-2011 , 02:46 AM


Mr MIYAGI NO LIKE FIGHTING
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-31-2011 , 04:23 AM
this thread should be referenced as a case study in fooled by randomness
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-31-2011 , 05:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDDtown
PKZ - I wasn't running hot in those tournaments, As a matter of fact I ran terrible on most of the final tables.
amazing. at this point im pretty sure its a level tbh, regardless of daliman's posts.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-31-2011 , 08:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDDtown
I like the idea of steady blinds & maintaining a minimum stack size, I just wonder if we should incorporate an upside stack size as well & remove some of the money in play at some level. The only reason I say this is that we could play a long time back & forth & reloading only in the end both of us end up super deep & stack the other in one lucky hand.


Although it isn't likely, theroretically we could both end up with close to 40k stacks & be even then win it all in one hand.
That's fine by me. Shall we say that if the shorter stack gets up to 400BB, we take money off to where we both have 250BB?

As to your other post, 10-20 or 20-40 are both fine by me. We can even split the difference and play 15-30. I'll let you decide.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-31-2011 , 01:05 PM
how is samoleus to trust your venue/dealers when you think playing in a casino is bad?
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-31-2011 , 01:12 PM
I have to say, as this seems more and more likely to happen I'm surprised EDD is actually going to put his money where his mouth is.

Good for you, man. (my money's sitll on Samo though...guy's just too sick.)

Edit: But yeah, the whole "not in a casino, my dealers only" bit is a little weird...I think you should let Samo choose the dealer since this is your world and you're 20 times more likely to have the kind of connections with pro dealers that would allow you to get them to cheat.

Also, make it at least 500bb deep before taking money off the table, imo.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-31-2011 , 01:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by caseycjc
I often wonder just what satisfaction people get from being obnoxious and rude. My guess is that it's a combination of jealousy (I seriously doubt the majority of the posters ITT have won anything close to what Gabe' won in one tournament) and contempt for someone that's sucessful yet can be fallible in some of their thinking.

I'm happy to see Gabe took Somoleus up on the challenge, not that it makes any difference to me who wins but at least it might shut up a bunch of lil girls that don't have anything better to do than troll threads.

It's not surprising at all that Samoleus is one of the few people in the thread that's conducted themselves like a decent guy but of course he is obviously confident in his skills so he has no reason to act like he's 12.

I wish you both good luck and look forward to hearing the details.
Could not say this any better.
Way too many posters itt seem to be ill-mannered adolescents.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-31-2011 , 02:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDDtown
I want to give an example of how online & live poker differs. Several years ago on my way to a wsop 2k final table I called a guy down with QJ high. I made this call in a live game, but could never have done it online.

I limp QJ off 3rd seat to enter or OHH UTG +2(isn't that how the online guys say it) LOL.

Anyway one other limper on button. sm blind folds. BB checks

Board 789, BB small bet, I check behind me to make sure button hadn't flopped huge, I can't pick up that he has, so I float QJ with gutshot for nuts, AT this point I assume better has something. The turn comes a 7,, board 7789. This is where I start to pick something up. We are head up, He fires big on turn. That pretty much puts him on trips, flopped straight full most of the time since he check calls hands like 810 or 910 many times. The only thing is he looks like he's bluffing, not like he flopped big, so then I start to think maybe open ended is all he has, I float again. River 4. Now he stops for like 2 minutes then, overbets ships all in . I can tell hes stone cold & bluffing or at least doesn't want called. At this point I start figuring up what I can beat, I assume he prob has a 10 in hand & not completely leading out with air. The only hands I can put him on that beat me are A10, K10, or 104, So I finally call with QJ high. He goes ballistic. Has no clue why I call, thinks im the biggest donkey in the world. It was all tells & I would never call down online. I went to make the final table of 2300 players.
That's funny, cause the exact same hand was played in the same way by Doyle Brunson.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-31-2011 , 02:24 PM
Hey EDDTown, are you going to take FF's challenge as well? You know, sample size and all...
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-31-2011 , 03:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by baudib
if by top 10 you mean 100 and by live you mean online, then yes
+1
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-31-2011 , 04:04 PM
the thing about the cards is completely true i expect, there is something very similar in the uk that has been used for tv games mtts and cash, a special camera reads the back of the cards allowing for the tv crew to do away with the hole card cameras ( pkr live 4 i believe was the 1st one, i was on the initial "tv table" (it never made tv but they made dvds and sent them to the players) also a recent sky poker(uk site) cash game involving a number of uk regulars and a few other games in between the two, im not sure at all how easy it is for any player to abuse this and i have no basis for argument for or against what gabe and dfish alluded to in new orleans, but i find it highly unlilkely the wsop allowed people to cheat a few people out of their money given how much they generate from the series in rake etc
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-31-2011 , 04:22 PM
Wow this actually might happen. Samoleus you are my hero.

Last edited by RanchDressin; 07-31-2011 at 04:24 PM. Reason: spelling
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-31-2011 , 06:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2DMB2LIV
I have to say, as this seems more and more likely to happen I'm surprised EDD is actually going to put his money where his mouth is.

Good for you, man. (my money's sitll on Samo though...guy's just too sick.)

Edit: But yeah, the whole "not in a casino, my dealers only" bit is a little weird...I think you should let Samo choose the dealer since this is your world and you're 20 times more likely to have the kind of connections with pro dealers that would allow you to get them to cheat.

Also, make it at least 500bb deep before taking money off the table, imo.
As far as I'm concerned we can go together to the store & buy 10 decks of bee or bicycles & swap them in and out & I don't care if he brings his mother to deal. I can promise you if I turned down $65000 in free sponsorship money I wouldn't never cheat anyone.

I agree that it probably should be 500BB before money removed.

Samo, 15/30 sounds good
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-31-2011 , 06:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EDDtown
As far as I'm concerned we can go together to the store & buy 10 decks of bee or bicycles & swap them in and out & I don't care if he brings his mother to deal. I can promise you if I turned down $65000 in free sponsorship money I wouldn't never cheat anyone.

I agree that it probably should be 500BB before money removed.

Samo, 15/30 sounds good
Props for going through with this.

Many players on both sides have mouthed off continuously over the years and even though I'm personally of the belief that a winning online player will dominate a winning live player at equivalent stakes, it's nice to see that you have the strenght of your convictions.

And yeah, +1 for 500bb. I'm sure Samo won't have a problem with it.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
07-31-2011 , 07:45 PM


Surprised this is happening, and thrilled that it is.

Best of luck to both of you.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
08-01-2011 , 12:10 AM
Wow. Never thought this would happen. Gabe, props to you for finally putting up. Good luck to both of you, but definitely need pics or videos of the match. Any way you can agree to put a camera, or have someone give us updates?
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
08-01-2011 , 12:14 AM
^ As a follow-up to the above question about cameras, if included, will there be a separate thread created for booking action? Is that allowed to be done in this thread?
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
08-01-2011 , 12:28 AM
definitely need this to be recorded.
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote
08-01-2011 , 12:34 AM
One worry about such challenges is the outsized impact of big pots in such a small sample size. Fwiw, I think that when you are both all-in you should do an equity chop to minimize the impact of luck on results
Live play vs. Online & why the Top ten players in the world will always be live players Quote

      
m