Quote:
Originally Posted by larry the legend
What do you mean he does not GAF? He is not even telling you who he is. You have no idea if he is a real person. If he did not GAF he would post his name and stand behind his accusations. Because it has nothing to do with him being scared of Wesley as he claims. Because if its true Wesley knows who he is, how does staying anonymous with the writing keep him from being harmed by Wesley if that is who he is scared of lol? There are so many holes in the anonymous story and you want to take it as mostly true based on what? Some pictures of messages that can be made with any app? Of a guy who blocked and would not speak to them and suddenly admits to a felony via text? Sorry I blocked you before. Yup I sent my guys to burglarize your house
Freedom35 “obviously saying he was blocked only meant temporarily until he changed his mind and confessed to killing his pregnant girlfriend on text”
why do you not use your real name on 2+2? anonymity is almost essential online unless you are already a public figure. The internet is vicious and people are biased af when it comes to celebrities, even F-list ones like wesley. If a pro scammed me I wouldn't be barging in like "HELLO IM NATHANIEL BARNES, PLS SEARCH ME ONLINE AND USE wHAT YOU FIND TO DISCREDIT MY CLAIMS AND HARASS ME BECAUSE I CRITICIZED THE CELEBRITY YOU LIKE".
The story follows a pretty normal timeline, and I can picture wesley being smug enough to taunt someone he swindled, he taunts pretty much everyone he beats at poker. The scam makes no sense because there is no financial gain to be had by outting wesley; it would have to be a pure effort to discredit wesley's reputation and it doesn't make sense. Even if he messaged wesley threatening to expose him if he didn't pay up, that would just be an attempt to recoup some of his losses and avoid further headaches. If someone is making this up, it should be super easy for wesley to prove that they are. For now, there are screenshots of conversations and a transaction log.
It's a pretty elaborate story to make up, but it all hinges on whether wesley was directly involved with SupremeX and whether other people were sold or advertised similar investments. If he was involved, I'm not sure why he couldn't just say the big investor flaked on him and he couldn't avoid the sell-off. Basically, I'm not writing off the claim just because it's poorly written in some spots, but it only has legs if they can get some corroborating witnesses or proof connecting SupremeX to wesley.