Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Garrett Adelstein Report on Likely Cheating on Hustler Casino Live Garrett Adelstein Report on Likely Cheating on Hustler Casino Live

11-29-2022 , 03:54 AM
Great point actually. Why would Garrett go all in? Unless he knew she had a better hand.
11-29-2022 , 04:16 AM
You don't usually win 12.5k bb's in 8k hands by playing fair.
11-29-2022 , 06:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DizzyG
knowing she had no pair

O RLY?
11-29-2022 , 06:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by justiceforgman
Here are the cliffs...

Those are the cliffs? JFC, I'd hate to see how long the full version is SMH.
11-29-2022 , 06:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by trampled
The great man Shakespeare once said that brevity is the soul of wit. How do you think this applies to your screed, OP?
Terrible application of the quote.

OP's answer to your question could simply be: "It does not."
11-29-2022 , 06:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrCrown
Those are the cliffs? JFC, I'd hate to see how long the full version is SMH.
Classy, come here, presumably not read the post. So then, rather than comment on the content, disparage the author for not being concise enough for *you*. Somehow I don't think you are terribly interested.

Last edited by PokerPunked; 11-29-2022 at 06:51 AM.
11-29-2022 , 07:29 AM
When did the thread get infected with middle-schoolers?

Prediction: nothing further will be released from either side. Christmas will come, then the new year, then this thread will slowly but surely die down, the same as the story. Every once in a while it will get brought back up on 2p2 and social media (like the legend of JJProdigy, etc.) but nothing definitive will ever be released.

/end of story
11-29-2022 , 07:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerPunked
Classy, come here, presumably not read the post. So then, rather than comment on the content, disparage the author for not being concise enough for *you*. Somehow I don't think you are terribly interested.
It was mildly interesting several weeks ago. Now not so much and it certainly does not merit a new thread every time a new theory comes out or a new snippet of information.


Looking at your post history on your brand new account, you most definitely are very interested in the story aren't you?

Every single post of yours is in the Garrett thread.

And you sound mad in that thread and here. Why you mad bro?

I wonder what YOUR interest in this is and who you are?
11-29-2022 , 08:02 AM
BREAKING NEWS

In Poker... some people cheat.
11-29-2022 , 09:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by justiceforgman
Robbi/Rip were getting signaled by someone in the poker room. I wrote a long post about it

https://medium.com/@justiceforgarret...m-812c1038520c

Here are the cliffs...
I don't think you understand what cliffs means, but thank you for alerting me to add you to my ignore list.
11-29-2022 , 09:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DizzyG
Garrett was the likely cheater as he knew her cards and pushed on her with a draw knowing she had no pair and no equity...she spazzed and called. He compensated by blaming her of cheating when he was the likely guilty party. Oh what a tangled web we weave when we first practice to deceive.
You're probably just joking but he would have bugged out when she called, not when she turned her cards over. Anyway, shoving there is a standard play by Garrett and not a bad spot to call (if you don't have J high).
11-29-2022 , 10:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SizzlerFTW
Terrible application of the quote.

OP's answer to your question could simply be: "It does not."
This post didn’t get the love it deserves.
11-29-2022 , 10:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lonely_but_rich
You're probably just joking but he would have bugged out when she called, not when she turned her cards over. Anyway, shoving there is a standard play by Garrett and not a bad spot to call (if you don't have J high).
Define standard? He's not even suppose to have a shove range period. If you started to have a shove range though, this would certainly be a top candidate
11-29-2022 , 10:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eskaborr
Define standard? He's not even suppose to have a shove range period. If you started to have a shove range though, this would certainly be a top candidate
He shoves draws a lot/normal. Why are you posting like you weren't just outed as a multi-accounting weirdo?
11-29-2022 , 11:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lonely_but_rich
He shoves draws a lot/normal. Why are you posting like you weren't just outed as a multi-accounting weirdo?
Why you asking questions you know the answer to? Can we just bet I don't have an alt? Why does it matter whats standard to gman? It's obviously not a standard play to shove on this board.
11-29-2022 , 12:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilbury Twist
But the OP is not trying to be witty, he's hoping to be informative. And in such a situation, it's better to be comprehensive, thorough and even exhaustive.
Sure but not spewing a bunch of lies and baseless speculation would have been even better.
11-29-2022 , 12:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrCrown
Every single post of yours is in the Garrett thread.

And you sound mad in that thread and here.
Wat?

In other news, we have some new posters! Welcome to the thread guys, gals and Eskaborr clones, can't wait to hear your opinions.

Last edited by happy to be hear; 11-29-2022 at 12:21 PM.
11-29-2022 , 12:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eskaborr
Why you asking questions you know the answer to? Can we just bet I don't have an alt? Why does it matter whats standard to gman? It's obviously not a standard play to shove on this board.
Why does it matter what a solver says when he's not (and shouldn't be) trying to mimic a solver in these games?
11-29-2022 , 12:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lonely_but_rich
He shoves draws a lot/normal. Why are you posting like you weren't just outed as a multi-accounting weirdo?
I almost forgot that Eskaborr outed himself as a person that posts to this thread with multiple accounts. Thanks for the reminder!

Why did eskaborr call himself pathetic for doing that? That seems kinda harsh to me.
11-29-2022 , 12:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by borg23
Why does it matter what a solver says when he's not (and shouldn't be) trying to mimic a solver in these games?
I'm not saying he should, but luckily that's not how this started. He called it standard... and i'm asking him by what merits is it standard. He made a non standard play and got exploited, may have got cheated but he did get exploited.

Kind of weird to say that it's a standard play because gman thinks it's standard, don't you think?
11-29-2022 , 12:28 PM
I see the confusion now. I meant standard for Garrett.
11-29-2022 , 12:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eskaborr
I'm not saying he should, but luckily that's not how this started. He called it standard... and i'm asking him by what merits is it standard. He made a non standard play and got exploited, may have got cheated but he did get exploited.

Kind of weird to say that it's a standard play because gman thinks it's standard, don't you think?
Still posting? How odd!
11-29-2022 , 12:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lonely_but_rich
I see the confusion now. I meant standard for Garrett.
Ah my bad I should have been able to put that together.
11-29-2022 , 12:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JackHi
Still posting? How odd!
Who is more likely to be a shill.... the high stakes reg who has been posting for 10+ years or the person who made an account named "JackHi" to post exclusively in these threads?
11-29-2022 , 12:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eskaborr
I'm not saying he should, but luckily that's not how this started. He called it standard... and i'm asking him by what merits is it standard. He made a non standard play and got exploited, may have got cheated but he did get exploited.

Kind of weird to say that it's a standard play because gman thinks it's standard, don't you think?
I kinda admire this strategy of yours: Muddy up the waters by posting garbage in order to distract people from the fact that you have been posting with multiple accounts--all while insisting that it's ludicrous to believe that shill accounts exist in this thread.

This is the direct quote you were responding to:
"You're probably just joking but he would have bugged out when she called, not when she turned her cards over. Anyway, shoving there is a standard play by Garrett and not a bad spot to call (if you don't have J high)."

In no way was he weighing in on whether Garrett should have a shoving range there. The clear point he was making is that, in his opinion, Garrett DOES have a shoving range there because shoving in that spot is a standard play FOR GARRETT.

      
m