Of course it is a sales pitch. That is literally the reason for the page.

However from reading from the actual words on the page they are advertising to innocent clients and promising accurate results.

You want to pretend that means their tests are somehow rigged. Maybe English isn't your 1st language, or maybe there are hidden words that only you can read. Who knows.

I'm getting the feeling from all the trolls randomly coming out of the woodwork and attacking me today, that someone might be upset at what I've been talking about lately.

Discussed some interesting topics lately. Especially yesterday. Not everyone is here though, which is interesting.

Yes we are trolls not the crowd who are claiming robbi cheated on the poker tables, and the lie detector was rigged with zero credible evidence of either. lol

Don't orget about George Soros and bouncing signals off of Itialian satellites. Maybe throw is some stuff about the deep state and other crazy nonsense that make people roll their eyes and laugh.

Could be as simple as Bryan knew the HCL cameras were off, but was either a bit panicked, or not thinking clearly, and didn't think that maybe the casino security cameras could still see the table as well. Or they had a camera he didn't know about.

Lower level criminals tend to make careless mistakes like that. That's usually how they get caught.

This applies to both him acting alone and in league with Robbi.

This is great. AWESOME. Almost perfect.

It just doesn't answer the question if Phil Ivey was in on the scam through edging?

robbi got robbed 135k by garett & 15k from bryan & somehow all the 2+2 conspiracy theorists think she's the criminal here

Voluntarily returning money after being accused of cheating = robbed.

This thread is something else.

You laught at hand and arm theory but it is way loess far fetched then you think

But with erik he has all the know how and contacts to compromise a casion electronically , he has eincentibves and all he needs is a simple poker solver. Run his hands through heads up vs Hellmuith see how he did.

A true poker player never complains about two regs slow playing each other. For one, they know it happens and is pretty much unenforceable. For two, if either of the slow players fit the right profile the player knows he has players he can overrun and bluff a lot.

Why would anyone complain about getting information like that?

You’ve never tank folded an obviously losing hand and wanted to convey that it was a tough decision?

I am very much in the puzzled camp over all of this. I don’t think she cheated, but that’s in part because despite the very best efforts of those who believe she did I still haven’t seen any compelling evidence as to how she did it.

I guess reading comprehension is tough for you.

Its more their deception, regs dont hide it. Its unspoken no theatrics, . Their song and dance play to the men's rea nto evidence of cheating tards. Not that that wa cheating it was that they did in a way that was deceptive and indicative of someone disguising their exportation or cheating.

You couldn't be more obvious what your agenda is here, if you were sitting next to Robbi at the Raiders game.

Yeah Strange it’s noticeable for a dying thread, there seems to be an uplift in the last couple of days of Robbie shilling.

It’s probably that paid publicist, oops sorry, I mean PR person trying to drive more clicks.

She must be stupid or just not realize how dumb it looks, I mean she could make the whole thing go away and Garrett look like a fool if she just explains how and why she played the hand the way she did. Something to this day she’s been unable or just unwilling to do, at least with any conviction or consistency.

If she hadn’t spun the whole thing, and instead was honest about the hand, instead of trying to turn this into a personal crusade for popularity and clicks, it would be over by now.

The shills and simps jumping to her defense, like f*cling lemmings throwing themselves off a cliff. There’s no logical reason for anonymous nobodies on the forum to defend her at all, let alone with the mouth foaming intensity we’re seeing here.

I don’t know if she’s honest or not, not my place to say, but she’s sure made it hard to trust. I know at least one person here (hi RJT) will claim that’s calling her a liar, but that’s not what I’m saying.

1. I didn't go back 34 pages. I was catching up since I last read the thread. I don't live here.

2. A guilty person isn't looking to take a lie detector test that could prove them a liar. More to your point, the advertisement doesn't address guilty people, it specifically addresses innocent people and speaks of accuracy.

3. Back at you, if they were advertising their flexibility in honesty, why wouldn't they just leave the word innocent out? It would work far better than your twisted version that requires people to read words that are not there.

Considering she mouthed it while being filmed, I wouldn’t say she went too hard to disguise it. But again it doesn’t mean anything. This happens all around the world in every poker game every day ever.

Lol. That is more handwriting.

Good luck on life. Apparently you really need it.

I don't know why I'm taking the bait with you again, but on the off chance you're capable of a civil conversation, you should read the part again about the results being confidential.

Or maybe they just find your logic laughable and your only defense is handwaving.

Why not just admit you were wrong about the advertisement? It would be better to admit you missed the word "innocent" and jumped to a false conclusion.

Or keep hand waving. Your choice.

On a scale of 1-10, with 1 being the dumbest person in history, and 10 being the 2nd dumbest person in history, are you a 1 or a 2?

Lol, are you trying to set a record for obviously stupid statements in one thread?

Here is a hint. I have absolutely zero connection Robbi or anyone else highlighted in this thread. I don't care about anyone highlighted in this thread. I do not know if Robbi cheated or not. I just require actual proof of someone cheating before labeling them a cheater.

I do not like intellectual dishonesty. I understand when people make mistakes (I make them all of the time). I think making a mistake is a great learning opportunity. If someone says something stupid and then accepts corrections when it is pointed out to them I will think highly of that person. Intellectual dishonesty is something else though. When someone tells me that innocent = guilty and then doubles down on it when called out that they are wrong thrn they are only useful for ridicule.

So please entertain. What is my agenda here?

Another thing that in the beginning was maybe far fetched, was Iveys involvement! But looking at the stream again after enough evidence that Eric was also in it! There are so many comments/dupe delights between Ivey, Eric, ROBBI before during and after the hand! Not even talking about both Eric and Ivey gave interview to cover for Their pawn! Ivey also has a history of finding legal edges and maybe even illegal edges! Comment from Ivey about Eric: I JUST WANT TO MAKE YOU FAMOUS Eric stands out on the table!
THEY ARE GOOD FRIENDS ALSO!

Me: 1,2,3,4,5,6. I see a pattern.

You: You’re seeing a pattern where there is none. Also, I’m a victim who mean people in this thread won’t stop attacking. Also, my factually unsupported arguments only *seem* factually unsupported. In reality, they represent fifth-dimension wisdom that requires nuanced thinking to grasp. Unfortunately, no one on the board where I have chosen to post more than 19,000 times is actually capable of this kind of thinking.