Quote:
Originally Posted by insidemanpoker
The reason Daniel's very brief reply is so empty is that he is basically completely denying reality in an effort not to step on toes.
You're misinterpreting reality. DN is the most outspoken and honest personality in the game. How much does it say about him that he reads every post in this thread and has responded multiple times? Moreover, he has not disputed any of the facts; but he has--as he admitted himself--chosen his words carefully because what the hell else is he supposed to do? He can't spout meaningless dribble.
When DN was called out multiple times for not publicly outing slow-payers, he quickly responded with a well-reasoned response that he handles such issues more privately. You can make a case, I think, that he is obligated to out people on the internet, but to claim that he is denying reality is either a poor choice of words on your part, or utter idiocy.
I think you're misunderstanding of the broad picture here is that you think that there is a one-size-fits-all scammer; that if someone doesn't pay immediately then internet justice should strike quickly. I think this is a poor perspective on the issue, especially--
especially!--when it comes to DN, who's integrity and openness are of the highest-order. You might disagree with DN, but I think you owe him enough respect to believe that he is acting reasonably and good faith. To claim he is denying reality is silly and insulting.