Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlotte FatMan
I never understand opinions like this. you do realize that you don't get to be chip leader this deep by happenstance or pure luck. He's surely not as talented as Ivey, but let's not make him out to be some schmuck who can't tell an Ace from a deuce.
Does poker only need interesting people in interviews to win? Jamie Gold is an interesting interview, but he also comes across as a smarmy d-bag.
Nobody winning this year will be a disaster for poker. And hell, if it insires the entire logging population to play next year, I'm all for it.
I dont want a cot dam logger as a poker champion, I want a fkn poker player. cinderella is nice once, or twice, or maybe even three times. Its old already. Not entertaining to watch undisciplined play with no concept of value betting or pot control, no strategy, and calls of 1/2 your chips with middle pair on a straight and flush board because you "wanted to see it to believe it".
All of those things hardly ever happened less than a decade ago and aside from a few anomolies from time to time, the WSOP for 30 some odd years had a champion crowned that lived up to the title in some way shape or form.
That crap is great in a cash game and I welcome it. That is a whole other animal entirely. Its saturated the biggest stage of poker and made it unbearable to watch from a pure card sense. I dont watch any wsop or tournament broadcasts unless the table is loaded or has some pros at it that know what they're doing.