Bump 4 value thanks dan vacation ftw

Sent from my GT-I9100 using 2+2 Forums

Proceeds the weedion Nazareth

he had a few lines in Lone Suvivor lol

really good movie imo

The dude payed for 10 mins or so.

They basically paid him to be in their movie lelel

Not sure what you're saying, don't most actors get paid to be in movies?

Or was that a typo and he paid them - which wouldn't surprise me in the slightest.

Obviously ACTORS get paid to be in movies.

The thing that I dont think you understand is that Blitz is not an actor but a dude who gave the movie money for production in exchange for screen time.

Due to the fact that they didnt give him all of the screen time his milsky bought(Only a small fraction of screen time), he is sueing them for the money back (And will probably win because the contract which is easily available online was pretty clear).

Therefore, he gets his money back while still getting screen time.

The way I see it, that millsky is no longer his once he invests in the movie so when he recoups it after still having a few lines in the movie, it will be like they paid him to be in their movie.

Most expensive hotel per night?

My good buddy Todd lost a heads up match vs the CEO of Victory Poker and had to get a Victory Tatoo, were you present? And are you guys as tight friends as he likes to portray?

lol at thinking his case has any legs. A producer or director is not going to put their mutli-million dollar production at the mercy of some amateur actor because he invested a small percentage of the total budget. Thinking he's going to get eight minutes screen time is laughably ignorant of the business. I haven't seen the movie yet, but since Eric Bana is not part of the mission that Marky Mark goes on, I bet he doesn't get much more than ten minutes screen time. And he's, you know...a star.

lolcontracts amirite?

how do you know the game for that robinhood project?

If the producers actually did contractually promise Dan 8 minutes of screen time in return for his investment, then he obviously has a case.

My point is that I'm doubting the validity of that case and so-called promise. Because it makes no sense.

Please stop saying that his case has no legs and check out the contract online.

The contract clearly stipulates that he is paying for a certain amount of screen time and that every minute of this that is taken away from him entitles him to portion of his money back.

Its funny because blitz doesnt come across as a super smart dude but that contract is so comprehensive and it saves his ass from getting screwed like he did.

Dude must have matlock as a lawyer.

Can you tell us about the new movie bro?!

seems solid.

Here's the contract.

Link should take you to the page but if it doesn't it's about 1/2 way down.

If producers comes up to you and asks you to help fund a movie who wouldn't make a contract to be somewhat apart of it.. Especially when it's about something you used be so passionate about

Thanks for the clarification mate. Like I said I'm not at all surprised he would pay to 'act'.

Ok it seems that when he financed this movie, it was only a small project.

Berg probably realized that he would get more money in the long run if the film was better as a result of Bilzerian speaking less than 8 minutes. This decision was probably made afterwards as a result of bad acting on Bilzerians part or good acting on the part of other actors. You can only make the movie so long and you can only cut so many eric bana parts. Only way this makes sense is if the movie is gna gross big and they just dgaf about a mill and would sacrafice that mill in order to keep the integrity of their film.

Well, if that contract is legit, I guess he's owed money! Still makes absolutely no sense from the Producer's POV, though.

The only way out for the studio is if Universal can make changes after the delivery cut. But I assume that whoever created a contract that detailed would have known if that was possible.

why not? if the producer needs $1M to finish the movie, he takes the dough, the "talent" gets filmed, and it goes to the editing room.

somewhere late in the editing process, there is probably a risk management group analyzing how much money the movie is going to make if it is good. If the estimate is a lot, and Dan's acting sucks, then they screw Dan, are willing to admit they are in breach of contract and refund his money (after the movie actually turns a profit). If it is estimated that the movie will end up in the red, they keep his part in the picture and keep his money.

Yeah, that's not how it usually works.

But I can see a situation where the first producers were going for a lower-budget and needed some seed money. And now that it's a big, Hollywood movie, they may not care about that contract and eat the cost of it and/or make Dan sue them.

Eh, but I guess that's pretty similar to what you said.

I wonder if there are any stipulations rwgarding DVD cuts/extra scenes.

as past military, gun lover, and having ties to the financial industry... what are your thoughts on obama and his policies?

Dan are you gonna play One Drop?