Originally Posted by Foucault
It's hard to imagine anyone who doesn't already know a good deal about poker making too much sense of this. Seems to me like he uses a lot of jargon and makes a lot of assumptions that he never explains.
Well stated, Foucault.. The article was just a krock of sht, and some of the phaggs on here go apesht over its nonsense..
What nonsense you ask? Oh uh, 'poker is just like any other job,' EXCEPT for the steady paycheck, the benefits, the socialization, the lack of social utility whatsoever, or remote possibly of growth.. etc...