You're arguing that trans women are no longer women?

You're failing pretty hard here.

This feels like a problem a dictionary could resolve.

Go for it.

Here is a good resource on color

https://physics.info/color/

So yes, "red" is the lowest wavelength light that is visible to humans, before it changes to orange.

Kindness is going to be trickier but it could be defined with enough examples.

I did something kind for someone today-- two things actually but I'll share one. I was at the grocery store and I had a decent amount of stuff and the lady behind me was only buying milk-- I told her to go in front of me.

Sir, you've just told us women don't exist.

If not thoughts, what do you think being trans is based on?

A fundamental sense of self-identity.

They don't. And I don't know if this lady identifies as one either.

Lol what?

I asked you also, and you avoided that question even when replying to the post.

I know what my definition of woman is, but it obviously doesn't match yours, so I would like to know what your definition is, along with the related questions I asked earlier.

It's not really fair to ask people to follow your word choices without even telling us what the words mean to you.

He has clearly set out his position many times.

He's told us women don't exist and also there was a lady he saw at a store and also he doesn't know what "women" means or how to use the word in a sentence.

What is it?

Then what gender am I? I've already said I have no fundamental sense of self-identity related to gender.

Also, a sense (in that context) still is a kind of thought.

I believe has said that he thinks all gender is cultural and not intrinsic.

In English we use the word "lady" to refer to adult human females, usually of a certain age.*

I shouldn't have to explain to you how common words work.

*"Unless they are "young ladies"

For me, it would be an adult with XX chromosomes.

But I don't think that implies any lack of respect for transgender people.

I guess that means you're nonbinary.


Sure, it's a less dismissive way of putting it. No Lucky, I am not going to explain to you what "dismissive" means.

Ok, so how about I give you two examples of a women. One is a cisgender woman, the other is a transgender woman.

You've yet to identify any reason why i should think defining "women" is particularly problematic.

I'm not sure which post specifically you want answer to, but feel free to share. Perhaps the best definition is similar to that of a Christian. If you tell me you are a Christian, I'm going to believe you unless I think you are like specifically trolling or something. Even those weird denominations that don't seem all that similar to other denominations that still call themselves christians.

Ok please give me those examples.

I'm still waiting for you to define it. In your first attempt you called it a female gender, which I assume you're backtracking on now since trans women aren't females.

Is it your opinion that "women" are defined by having a certain appearance? i.e., having long hair and wearing makeup?

Surely you know a cisgender female. Pick one of those. You might not know of a transgender female in your life. Maybe ask around. Pick that one. Now you have your two examples. Remember, you were the one who defined stuff by saying you could give a couple examples, I'm just following your lead. But it isn't a bad lead, to be honest, thinking of women as people with female anatomy or people with male anatomy who identify as a woman is reasonable enough. Everyone should be able to follow along with that idea, at least.


I would say trans women are females. As I've said before, it is tempting to code "female" for exclusively a biological trait, but we use women/female so interchangeably and not with this sharp dichotomy that I call trans women females.


Yikes. Try again.

You were the one who said you were going to post examples of women. I was just trying to guess what they might look like.

What are the examples supposed to show?

I don't know any trans women but I do know a trans guy-- so we'll go with that.

And as best as I can determine it's all about how they self-identify. Is that the correct answer?