President Donald Trump - Page 2943 - Politics and Society -- Two Plus Two Poker Forums

Two Plus Two Forums Other Topics Politics and Society

President Donald Trump

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 2943 of 2955

First

1943 2443 2743 2843 2893 2923 2933 2938 2939 2940 2941 2942 2943 2944 2945 2946 2947 2948 2953

Last

Page 2943 of 2955

First

1943 2443 2743 2843 2893 2923 2933 2938 2939 2940 2941 2942 2943 2944 2945 2946 2947 2948 2953

Last

05-20-2026 , 03:28 PM

#73551

jjjou812

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 7,498

Quote:

Originally Posted by geezerchess

Probably only one out of every three posts tbh.

That’s almost an 80% decrease. Or 1.78%.

Quote

$25m Guaranteed WPM on CoinPoker

Join the action now

Daily Rewards • Splash Pots • CoinRaces

05-20-2026 , 05:46 PM

#73552

King Spew

Just average

Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 16,136

Quote:

Originally Posted by natediggity

How would one go about getting on the 5 person "Truth and Justice Commission" to oversee distribution of the $1.776B fund? Do I have to apply?

I going after it from the other end and will apply even though I have no legitimate claim. Should be fun if we can get millions to do the same thing and swamp nate and his 4 other cohorts.

Quote

05-20-2026 , 07:29 PM

#73553

GTO2.0

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 4,732

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Spew

I going after it from the other end and will apply even though I have no legitimate claim. Should be fun if we can get millions to do the same thing and swamp nate and his 4 other cohorts.

Well it says that they don’t have to reveal basically any information about who gets the money so they’re probably not going to read any of that **** anyways.

Quote

05-20-2026 , 07:52 PM

#73554

natediggity

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 17,009

Quote:

Originally Posted by King Spew

I going after it from the other end and will apply even though I have no legitimate claim. Should be fun if we can get millions to do the same thing and swamp nate and his 4 other cohorts.

I point out the absolute ridiculousness of this fund to coworkers and I get "well you know Biden and his crew were doing the same thing" and I just ask them "are you being serious?"

It's unbelievable. Our money might actually be going to the QAnon Shaman.

Quote

05-20-2026 , 08:39 PM

#73555

Rococo

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 25,080

Quote:

Originally Posted by natediggity

If anyone cares about fixing government, then we should pass a law that automatically stays (and tolls the statute of limitations for) any lawsuit that a sitting president has filed against U.S. government. That would eliminate the ridiculous spectacle of a "settlement" that is "negotiated" between the president and an agency controlled by the president.

Quote

05-20-2026 , 08:48 PM

#73556

StoppedRainingMen

Player Hater of the Year

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 61,366

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rococo

Ffs the fund is 1.776 bln literally cuz 1776 hyuck hyuck hyuck

This is just heinous

Quote

05-20-2026 , 10:28 PM

#73557

campfirewest

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 11,241

Is My Pillow publicly traded? Time to back up the truck on that one.

Quote

05-21-2026 , 12:27 AM

#73558

geezerchess

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Jan 2025 Posts: 5,097

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gorgonian

Peddle this bs to someone else please.

I'll 'peddle' anything I want in response to your posts. Just like anyone else.

Quote

05-21-2026 , 12:30 AM

#73559

geezerchess

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Jan 2025 Posts: 5,097

Quote:

Originally Posted by checkraisdraw

I prefer the terminology “stance independent” vs “stance dependent” over intrinsic vs extrinsic. Because what you just offered as the explanation of why a human is valuable but dog vomit is not is just a description of humans. “Humans have the image of God”. Then you need a connecting premise to get to a normative statement. “Having the image of God is valuable”. But what kind of value? You still need the description of what you mean by value. So is it stance dependent value or stance independent value? Because the intrinsic or extrinsic value doesn’t seem to bridge the gap of proving moral realism.

This is a lot of deep stuff to take in. I will think it over and respond in due course.

Quote

05-21-2026 , 12:32 AM

#73560

geezerchess

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Jan 2025 Posts: 5,097

Quote:

Originally Posted by whatthejish

geezer/lag on his knees begging for this undertitle

Slight exaggeration, but essentially correct.

Quote

05-21-2026 , 08:03 AM

#73561

Gorgonian

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 8,177

Quote:

Originally Posted by geezerchess

I'll 'peddle' anything I want in response to your posts. Just like anyone else.

Then you'll be blocked just like anyone else would. I don't tolerate proselytizing, especially when it has been clear it was unwelcome.

Not a threat, just a notification. Take it however you'd like.

Quote

05-21-2026 , 08:13 AM

#73562

geezerchess

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Jan 2025 Posts: 5,097

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gorgonian

Then you'll be blocked just like anyone else would. I don't tolerate proselytizing, especially when it has been clear it was unwelcome.

Not a threat, just a notification. Take it however you'd like.

Thanks for the notification.

Quick personal question if I may be so bold: Do you have LandOlakes blocked, and if so why?

Quote

05-21-2026 , 08:39 AM

#73563

Rococo

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 25,080

Most of the right-wing opposition to the Iran war really has nothing to do with morality, an assessment of Iranian nuclear capability, an assessment of the viability of U.S. strategic objectives, waste of money, or unnecessary casualties. The war is inconsistent with the inward-looking nationalism that Trump sold to the MAGA nation. That's the real hanging offense for people like Tucker and MTG.

Quote

05-21-2026 , 10:49 AM

#73564

Victor

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 81,654

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rococo

so is the liberal opposition. they cite gas prices, and the cost of the war. and ofc Dems supporters are extremely critical that the war has failed.

anyone opposing this war on the basis of morality should be extremely happy that the US and Israel lost.

Quote

05-21-2026 , 11:01 AM

#73565

Rococo

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 25,080

Quote:

Originally Posted by Victor

I'm surprised that you believe liberal opposition to the war is grounded in inward-looking nativism. I would have expected you to say that all liberal opposition to the war is performative and that they actually love the war

Quote

05-21-2026 , 11:09 AM

#73566

StoppedRainingMen

Player Hater of the Year

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 61,366

Maybe stop debating Victor?

Quote

05-21-2026 , 11:23 AM

#73567

Rococo

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 25,080

Quote:

Originally Posted by StoppedRainingMen

Maybe stop debating Victor?

I wasn't really debating Victor. My original comment wasn't a response to him.

In any case, you go back and forth with all sorts of posters.

Quote

05-21-2026 , 11:24 AM

#73568

Gorgonian

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 8,177

Quote:

Originally Posted by geezerchess

Thanks for the notification.

Quick personal question if I may be so bold: Do you have LandOlakes blocked, and if so why?

Yes. Because I also don't tolerate sandy hook conspiracy theorists. Believing those children were part of some nefarious hoax is completely intolerable to me.

Quote

05-21-2026 , 11:42 AM

#73569

Victor

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 81,654

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rococo

well Dem politicians by and large support all war. thats why they always just come short of imposing the bare minimum in the War Powers Act. thats why Schumer calls Trump a taco when he doesnt bomb Iran. thats why Obama straight up said they planned a war with Iran ad the JCPOA was to buy time. thats why Kamala campaigned on being tougher than Trump on Iran.

Dem supporters would absolutely support this if Biden or Obama were doing it.

Quote

05-21-2026 , 11:44 AM

#73570

Rococo

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 25,080

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gorgonian

Yes. Because I also don't tolerate sandy hook conspiracy theorists. Believing those children were part of some nefarious hoax is completely intolerable to me.

LoL is a Sandy Hook truther?

Quote

05-21-2026 , 11:44 AM

#73571

geezerchess

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Jan 2025 Posts: 5,097

Quote:

Originally Posted by Victor

I think you're a tad premature in suggesting that the Zionist Coalition (TM Pending) has lost.

Quote

05-21-2026 , 11:45 AM

#73572

Victor

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 81,654

Quote:

Originally Posted by geezerchess

I think you're a tad premature in suggesting that the Zionist Coalition (TM Pending) has lost.

its the Epstein Coalition. but thats true, I should have said they are "losing" or they lost this round.

Quote

05-21-2026 , 11:46 AM

#73573

geezerchess

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Jan 2025 Posts: 5,097

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rococo

...for fun and profit!

Quote

05-21-2026 , 11:48 AM

#73574

geezerchess

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Jan 2025 Posts: 5,097

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gorgonian

Yes. Because I also don't tolerate sandy hook conspiracy theorists. Believing those children were part of some nefarious hoax is completely intolerable to me.

I knew Luckbox believed the Sandy Hook Conspiracy, but I didn't know that LandoLakes did as well.