Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Politics and Society Moderation Discussion Only Fans Thread Politics and Society Moderation Discussion Only Fans Thread

10-31-2023 , 07:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbouton
I did spell it out. If a someone favored by the mods gets shown up with truth, all they have to do invoke circularity into the dialogue until a mod comes in and warns/bans the unfavored person.
You didn't, and you still haven't.

This is what you claimed:

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbouton
The prevalent mod in there will not let posters claim that the war is a proxy war between nato and russia.
And this is what I asked you:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
Precisely who is not letting posters make this claim, and how are they doing so? Just spell it out.
Can you answer that?
10-31-2023 , 07:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
You didn't, and you still haven't.

This is what you claimed:


And this is what I asked you:


Can you answer that?
Is bobo fett the only one that didn't see my explanation?

Spoiler:
Quote:
I'm appealing to the impartial observer.


Edit: I think ur pretending not to see my answer bobo.
10-31-2023 , 07:28 PM
I wonder what a typical IRL spoken interaction between button and another human looks like.
10-31-2023 , 07:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
I wonder what a typical IRL spoken interaction between button and another human looks like.
He's typically partaking in a salon with others of his intellectual equal. They endlessly discuss things in between puffs on their cigars (or perhaps a pipe). After several sessions of robust debate, each of them independently determines that they, and they alone, are correct. Of course, no one can remember the original topic, so what they are correct about is left to only the non-existent gods to know. Rinse. Repeat.
10-31-2023 , 07:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbouton
Edit: I think ur pretending not to see my answer bobo.
I've yet to see an answer to this, and I'm not sure why it's so difficult to get one:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
Precisely who is not letting posters make this claim, and how are they doing so? Just spell it out.
10-31-2023 , 07:43 PM
https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/n...ply&p=58319729
Quote:
Originally Posted by MyrnaFTW
thank you for the truth bombs bill . all purple
Its not the act of adopting the system that matters. Its not even the exercise of showing it so much. Its thought experiment of it. It puts a construct in each of us, and thus the 'impartial observer', that has us remembering to recognize that you don't win for humanity when you are blue and stuff out red or vice versa etc.

So in a time of obvious dualistic thinking for humanity, some of the brighter game theoretic thinkers of this world (ie this community) I think could use a reminder (or awareness to the fact) that the game 'winning an argument' is the thing thats the root of the conflicts we wish would cease.
10-31-2023 , 07:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
Precisely who is not letting posters make this claim, and how are they doing so? J
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
I've yet to see an answer to this, and I'm not sure why it's so difficult to get one:
Well I claimed I did answer this, and I have accused you of pretending not to see it. So now what I'm doing is asking if anyone else here can back me up that I answered you. It seems fair that we have patience for that possibility. Maybe there are people here that might back up your claim that I didn't give you an answer.
10-31-2023 , 09:35 PM
jbouton,

This is very simple. You said:

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbouton
There is problem in the Ukraine russia thread. The prevalent mod in there will not let posters claim that the war is a proxy war between nato and russia.
What is the name of the Politics mod that you are referring to and what action did this mod take to prevent posters from claiming that the Russia/Ukraine war is a proxy war?

Last edited by Rococo; 10-31-2023 at 09:42 PM.
10-31-2023 , 09:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rococo
jbouton,

This is very simple. You said:

What is the name of the Politics mod that you are referring to and what action did this mod take to prevent posters from claiming that the Russia/Ukraine war is a proxy war?
Its not fair if mods gang up on me and pretend that I didn't answer a question that I answered. You have to get a non-mod to deny it. otherwise you guys are power tripping hard, in a time that is very bad for humanity. Very bad.

So who is the non-mod that wants to say that I didn't answer the question you guys are charging me with...? Because if someone stands up, I'm going to quote their denial of me answering with my answer that I already gave.
10-31-2023 , 09:55 PM
If you ban me, without a non-mod saying that I didn't answer the question. I'm going to accuse you of anti-semitism.

If a someone favored by the mods gets shown up with truth, all they have to do invoke circularity into the dialogue until a mod comes in and warns/bans the unfavored person.
10-31-2023 , 10:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbouton
If you ban me, without a non-mod saying that I didn't answer the question. I'm going to accuse you of anti-semitism.
You have not named a moderator who took any action in this forum, and you have not specified what action was taken, so you have not answered the question.

If you mean that you pointed to a debate you had with a moderator of another forum, fine, but that has nothing to do with your claim, and that poster has no more authority than you do to take action on any post in that thread.

In case you forgot, this is your claim:

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbouton
There is problem in the Ukraine russia thread. The prevalent mod in there will not let posters claim that the war is a proxy war between nato and russia. Here is the definition from wiki:
Why is the mod you named "prevalent", and how is he "not letting" you do this? You have not answered these questions.
10-31-2023 , 10:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbouton
Its not fair if mods gang up on me and pretend that I didn't answer a question that I answered. You have to get a non-mod to deny it. otherwise you guys are power tripping hard, in a time that is very bad for humanity. Very bad.

So who is the non-mod that wants to say that I didn't answer the question you guys are charging me with...? Because if someone stands up, I'm going to quote their denial of me answering with my answer that I already gave.
Are you claiming that you identified the moderator by name? Where?
10-31-2023 , 10:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
You have not named a moderator who took any action in this forum, and you have not specified what action was taken, so you have not answered the question.

If you mean that you pointed to a debate you had with a moderator of another forum, fine, but that has nothing to do with your claim, and that poster has no more authority than you do to take action on any post in that thread.

In case you forgot, this is your claim:

Why is the mod you named "prevalent", and how is he "not letting" you do this? You have not answered these questions.
What?

Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
Insulting you as a person does not in and of itself make my post an "ad hominem". "Ad hominem" means "attacking the person, not the argument". Your argument is so ****ing stupid and meaningless that it's not even worth attacking, so I am reduced to attacking the person.

I am not sure who is winning the race to the bottom of the IQ ladder, you or chez, but you are both certifiable ****ing cretins.
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
You, chez and button are basically the biggest morons on the planet. Proving any of you right or wrong is ****ing meaningless.
10-31-2023 , 10:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbouton
What?
Not sure why you keep quoting me calling you a cretin. You asked for a non-mod to post on the matter and I obliged. Not sure how those quotes are relevant.
10-31-2023 , 10:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
Not sure why you keep quoting me calling you a cretin. You asked for a non-mod to post on the matter and I obliged. Not sure how those posts are relevant.
They discredit you in regard to being an impartial observer.
10-31-2023 , 10:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbouton
They discredit you in regard to being and impartial observer.
Sounds like an ad hominem to me.
10-31-2023 , 10:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
Sounds like an ad hominem to me.
No its not an ad hominem when its an inquiry into your impartiality. It's evidence you are not impartial.
10-31-2023 , 10:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbouton
No its not an ad hominem when its an inquiry into your impartiality. It's evidence you are not impartial.
The fact that I think you have the intelligence and likability of a potted plant doesn't in and of itself make me biased against your arguments.

If judges had to recuse themselves every time they thought a defendant was a moron, you wouldn't have a lot of judges left to preside over court cases.
10-31-2023 , 10:42 PM
Halloween III totally rules you guys
10-31-2023 , 10:43 PM
Button,

It seems like at least once a month you make a string of posts that are so ridiculous that your mental fitness seriously has to be questioned. I really hope you are trolling, but that brings up the flip side: what kind of person would keep up this facade just for the lulz for this long?
10-31-2023 , 10:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
Insulting you as a person does not in and of itself make my post an "ad hominem". "Ad hominem" means "attacking the person, not the argument". Your argument is so ****ing stupid and meaningless that it's not even worth attacking, so I am reduced to attacking the person.

I am not sure who is winning the race to the bottom of the IQ ladder, you or chez, but you are both certifiable ****ing cretins.
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
You, chez and button are basically the biggest morons on the planet. Proving any of you right or wrong is ****ing meaningless.
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
The fact that I think you have the intelligence and likability of a potted plant doesn't in and of itself make me biased against your arguments.

If judges had to recuse themselves every time they thought a defendant was a moron, you wouldn't have a lot of judges left to preside over court cases.
Other people here don't think I'm stupid, some say it, but people aren't thinking that.

Are you saying that other people will agree that you would give me an impartial judgment or is it going to be just you asserting that you are impartial towards me? Because I'm certain not a single person here believes you.
10-31-2023 , 10:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonkJr
Button,

It seems like at least once a month you make a string of posts that are so ridiculous that your mental fitness seriously has to be questioned. I really hope you are trolling, but that brings up the flip side: what kind of person would keep up this facade just for the lulz for this long?
You are dehumanizing me, and its a terrible time for humanity for you to be doing that.
10-31-2023 , 10:47 PM
You are stupid. Even though you have been beaten over the head about it for months, you still don't know what "ad hominem" means.
10-31-2023 , 10:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonkJr
You are stupid. Even though you have been beaten over the head about it for months, you still don't know what "ad hominem" means.
You are not impartial. Nobody impartial thinks he is stupid. Anyone who thinks he is stupid is not impartial by virtue of saying he is stupid. QED.

Humanity saved, phew!
10-31-2023 , 10:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
You are not impartial. Nobody impartial thinks he is stupid. Anyone who thinks he is stupid is not impartial by virtue of saying he is stupid. QED.

Humanity saved, phew!
The only other explanation is that I am only saying it, but don't mean it. I mean, who could possibly doubt the grand intelligence of somebody that posts pages and pages of pure psychosis every single day?

      
m