Open Side Menu Go to the Top

05-26-2025 , 02:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by geezerchess
The point is that if Evolutionism is true, then it is utterly irrelevant what you care about since Evolution is gonna do it's thing either way.

The death of the old and the infirm is just part of the process.

One of Nietsche's critiques of Christianity was that it severly slowed man's evolution toward the Uberman. He thought that time, talent, treasure and resources on the old and infirm was crippling human progress.

"Man must be overcome; what have you done to overcome him?" (from Thus Spoke Zarathustra)
If you must cite mad Freddy at least spell his name correctly.
Moderation Questions Quote
Moderation Questions
$25m Guaranteed WPM on CoinPoker
Join the action now
Daily Rewards • Splash Pots • CoinRaces
Moderation Questions
05-26-2025 , 02:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by geezerchess
Thanks for reminding me of the quote.

There is certainly no actual or even implied denunciation of medicine in that quote.

In fact, medicine can help the smart folks live longer and the strong folks get stronger or stay stronger for longer.

"Survival of the Fittest Baby!"
That’s not what Darwin meant by “fittest”.
Moderation Questions Quote
05-26-2025 , 02:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
If you must cite mad Freddy at least spell his name correctly.
Nietzsche!!!

Hope you're happy now, jalfreeze!

Moderation Questions Quote
05-26-2025 , 02:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
That’s not what Darwin meant by “fittest”.
Did Darwin even use the phrase "survival of the fittest?"
Moderation Questions Quote
05-26-2025 , 02:58 AM
Yes, in the fifth edition of On The Origin Of Species.

He wasn’t describing insects going to the gym.
Moderation Questions Quote
05-26-2025 , 03:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
Yes, in the fifth edition of On The Origin Of Species.

He wasn’t describing insects going to the gym.



Over 30 years ago I wrote a paper (which was never published) called, "Origin of the Specious." In it, I discussed the origin of Evolutionism and how it predated Darwin by over 2,000 years.

Last edited by geezerchess; 05-26-2025 at 03:05 AM. Reason: grammar
Moderation Questions Quote
05-26-2025 , 03:09 AM
Darwin didn’t invent evolution dude, he discovered it.
Moderation Questions Quote
05-26-2025 , 03:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
Darwin didn’t invent evolution dude, he discovered it.
I never said Darwin invented evolution, dude.

He also didn't discover evolution, dude.

Evolutionism dates back to ancient Greek philosophy, dude.
Moderation Questions Quote
05-26-2025 , 03:15 AM
Fun Factoid:

Charles Darwin's college degree was in Theology.
Moderation Questions Quote
05-26-2025 , 08:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by geezerchess
Natural Selection is real.

But even within natural selection, cats have kittens and dogs have puppies.

What is also real is that we are made in the Image of God, which gives us a moral compass.
So obviously you don't think it's fine for people to die of COVID even thought you accept that natural selection is real. Obviously that kind of misanthropy is a non-sequitur.
Moderation Questions Quote
05-26-2025 , 11:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luckbox Inc
I didn't deliberately give COVID to anyone.
I hate this kind of thinking (not only on this topic but overall). It's not enough to not "mean to" do something. Most of the time there are things you need to "mean not to" do. In other words, actively try to not have something happen. "I didn't mean to drive my car into those people in the crosswalk but I was checking my messages" is not a good excuse. Actions have consequences.
Moderation Questions Quote
05-26-2025 , 11:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossnerd
I stopped speaking to my father
this makes me really sad, i hope you can take some time to swallow injustice and mend the void
Moderation Questions Quote
05-26-2025 , 11:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
So obviously you don't think it's fine for people to die of COVID even thought you accept that natural selection is real. Obviously that kind of misanthropy is a non-sequitur.
I think folks dying of COVID is terrible. However, within Evolution Philosophy (which I obviously reject) folks dying of COVID isn't inherently problematic.
Moderation Questions Quote
05-26-2025 , 11:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by geezerchess
I think folks dying of COVID is terrible.
So do the folks who accept mainstream science on evolution, so whatever you were implying is rather dishonest.
Moderation Questions Quote
05-26-2025 , 11:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
So do the folks who accept mainstream science on evolution, so whatever you were implying is rather dishonest.
I never said folks who accept mainstream science are happy with folks dying of COVID.

I specifically said (maybe in another thread) that most folks do have compassion for others: the reason being that we all are made in the Image of God and thereby have a conscience.
Moderation Questions Quote
05-26-2025 , 11:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by geezerchess
I think folks dying of COVID is terrible. However, within Evolution Philosophy (which I obviously reject) folks dying of COVID isn't inherently problematic.
This is pretty ****ing dumb, even by your standards, and that's some achievement.
Moderation Questions Quote
05-26-2025 , 11:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by d2_e4
This is pretty ****ing dumb, even by your standards, and that's some achievement.
Thank you! I accept any and all accolades!!
Moderation Questions Quote
05-26-2025 , 11:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by geezerchess
I think folks dying of COVID is terrible. However, within Evolution Philosophy (which I obviously reject) folks dying of COVID isn't inherently problematic.
you are conflating social darwinism with considering the theory of evolution correct to explain what happens.

it's the social darwinists who won't find it particularly problematic if the weak and frail die.
Moderation Questions Quote
05-26-2025 , 12:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luciom
you are conflating social darwinism with considering the theory of evolution correct to explain what happens.

it's the social darwinists who won't find it particularly problematic if the weak and frail die.
That's a fair point.

Having said that, Social Darwinism is a natural (so-to-speak) consequence of Evolution Philosophy.
Moderation Questions Quote
05-26-2025 , 12:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by geezerchess
I never said folks who accept mainstream science are happy with folks dying of COVID.

I specifically said (maybe in another thread) that most folks do have compassion for others: the reason being that we all are made in the Image of God and thereby have a conscience.
A post I made in this thread just yesterday:

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/s...ostcount=13985

Natural Selection is real.

But even within natural selection, cats have kittens and dogs have puppies.

What is also real is that we are made in the Image of God, which gives us a moral compass.
Moderation Questions Quote
05-26-2025 , 12:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by geezerchess
But even within natural selection, cats have kittens and dogs have puppies.
What is the purpose of this line?
Moderation Questions Quote
05-26-2025 , 02:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by geezerchess
A post I made in this thread just yesterday:

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/s...ostcount=13985

Natural Selection is real.

But even within natural selection, cats have kittens and dogs have puppies.

What is also real is that we are made in the Image of God, which gives us a moral compass.
So God is a white black brown Chinese trans hermaphrodite?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gorgonian
What is the purpose of this line?
It means men are men and woman are woman and that's all there is to it. Checkmate.
Moderation Questions Quote
05-26-2025 , 02:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by corpus vile
So God is a white black brown Chinese trans hermaphrodite?


It means men are men and woman are woman and that's all there is to it. Checkmate.
You guys have to be doing this **** on purpose now.
Moderation Questions Quote
05-26-2025 , 02:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by geezerchess



Over 30 years ago I wrote a paper (which was never published) called, "Origin of the Specious." In it, I discussed the origin of Evolutionism and how it predated Darwin by over 2,000 years.
No one before Darwin and Wallace had worked out the mechanism, that is, the common descent of all organisms and the practical favouring of random mutations.
Moderation Questions Quote
05-26-2025 , 02:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by geezerchess



Over 30 years ago I wrote a paper (which was never published) called, "Origin of the Specious." In it, I discussed the origin of Evolutionism and how it predated Darwin by over 2,000 years.
Not bad. Not quite Sense and Sensibilia by JL Austin but I hope the book I never wrote had such a good title.
Moderation Questions Quote
Moderation Questions
$25m Guaranteed WPM on CoinPoker
Join the action now
Daily Rewards • Splash Pots • CoinRaces
Moderation Questions

      
m